The action of a periodic orbit agrees in the two Liouville conventions
ProvedFiniteEnergyPlane.integral_liouvilleForm_eqliouville-formreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometry
Let be a periodic orbit of on in the HryniewiczCriterion setting. Then its action computed with the Liouville form of that setting equals the action of the curve , viewed in V 1, computed with the Liouville form of the FiniteEnergyPlane setting:
This lets a bound on the action stated in one setting be used in the other, for example when comparing periods of Reeb orbits with hypotheses on actions.
Formalization Note The right-hand integrand is liouville (ofR4 (R.x τ)) (deriv (fun s => ofR4 (R.x s)) τ), with ofR4 : HryniewiczCriterion.R4 → V 1 the identity on coordinates. No hypothesis on is needed.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane
/-- The action of a periodic orbit `R` of `HryniewiczCriterion` is the same whether computed with
`HryniewiczCriterion.liouvilleForm` or, after the identification `ofR4`, with the Liouville form of
`FiniteEnergyPlane`. -/
theorem integral_liouvilleForm_eq (H₀ : HryniewiczCriterion.R4 → ℝ)
(R : HryniewiczCriterion.PeriodicOrbit H₀) :
(∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..R.T, HryniewiczCriterion.liouvilleForm (R.x t) (deriv R.x t)) =
∫ τ in (0 : ℝ)..R.T, liouville (ofR4 (R.x τ)) (deriv (fun s => ofR4 (R.x s)) τ) := by
sorry
end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Trans. AMS 364 (2012), Section 2 (action of a periodic Reeb orbit, compared across two formal settings)