Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Claim 4.14, proof, first step — lowering an agent's times on its own set keeps that set

Proved
AlgMechDesign.Local.own_set_unchanged

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

algorithmic-game-theorymechanism-designp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1scheduling

Let (x,p)(x, p)(x,p) be a truthful mechanism for task scheduling, ttt a positive type vector and iii an agent such that xi(t)x^i(t)xi(t) is the unique maximizer of iii's utility among the sets attainable against t−it^{-i}t−i. Let 0<ε0 < \varepsilon0<ε with ε≤tji\varepsilon \le t^i_jε≤tji​ for every task j∈xi(t)j \in x^i(t)j∈xi(t), and let

t^=t(xi(t)→iε)\hat t = t\bigl(x^i(t) \xrightarrow{i} \varepsilon\bigr)t^=t(xi(t)i​ε)

be ttt with agent iii's time on each task of xi(t)x^i(t)xi(t) lowered to ε\varepsilonε. Then xi(t^)=xi(t)x^i(\hat t) = x^i(t)xi(t^)=xi(t).

In the proof of Theorem 4.12 this is the first half of Claim 4.14: the agent whose times were lowered keeps its set, so the other agents only need to choose among sets disjoint from it.

Formalization Note The paper applies the step at tji=1t^i_j = 1tji​=1 with 0<ε<10 < \varepsilon < 10<ε<1; after the perturbation of Lemma 4.13 the type vector is only near 111, so the condition is stated as ε≤tji\varepsilon \le t^i_jε≤tji​ on the tasks of xi(t)x^i(t)xi(t).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_AlgMechDesign_Local_Model
import Definitions.Def_AlgMechDesign_Local_Prices
Formal statement
namespace AlgMechDesign.Local

/-- Proof of Claim 4.14, p. 181, first step ("Clearly x²(t̂) = x²(t)"): for a truthful mechanism,
if at the positive type vector `t` the set `xⁱ(t)` is the unique maximizer of agent `i`'s
utility, then lowering agent `i`'s times on the tasks of `xⁱ(t)` to `ε`
(`0 < ε ≤ tⁱ_j` for those tasks) leaves agent `i`'s set unchanged. -/
theorem own_set_unchanged {n k : ℕ} (alloc : (Fin n → Fin k → ℝ) → (Fin k → Fin n))
    (pay : (Fin n → Fin k → ℝ) → Fin n → ℝ) (htr : IsTruthful alloc pay)
    (t : Fin n → Fin k → ℝ) (ht : IsType t) (i : Fin n)
    (huniq : IsUniqueMaximizer alloc pay t i) (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε)
    (hle : ∀ j ∈ agentSet alloc t i, ε ≤ t i j) :
    agentSet alloc (setTimes t i (agentSet alloc t i) ε) i = agentSet alloc t i := by sorry

end AlgMechDesign.Local
Source
Nisan, Ronen, Algorithmic Mechanism Design, Games Econ. Behav. 35, 2001, p. 181, proof of Claim 4.14, first sentence ("Clearly x²(t̂) = x²(t)")
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me