Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

The kernel of the asymptotic operator

Proved
FiniteEnergyPlane.asympOp_eq_zero_iff

by Mazecto · Oct 21, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

asymptotic-operatorpseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S=H−1(1)S=H^{-1}(1)S=H−1(1) be a strictly star-shaped level, JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ, and P=(x,T)P=(x,T)P=(x,T) a periodic Reeb orbit with linearized Reeb flow Φ\PhiΦ. A ξ\xiξ-loop η\etaη along PPP satisfies APη=0A_P\eta=0AP​η=0 if and only if η(t)=Φ(Tt)η(0)\eta(t)=\Phi(Tt)\eta(0)η(t)=Φ(Tt)η(0) for all ttt. Moreover PPP is nondegenerate if and only if the only ξ\xiξ-loop η\etaη with APη=0A_P\eta=0AP​η=0 is η=0\eta=0η=0.

Formalization Note The first claim is stated for every Φ with IsLinReebFlow P Φ.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- The kernel of the asymptotic operator: a `ξ`-loop `η` satisfies `A_P η = 0` if and only if
`η(t) = Φ(Tt) η(0)` for the linearized Reeb flow `Φ`. Consequently `P` is nondegenerate if and
only if `A_P` has trivial kernel on `ξ`-loops. -/
theorem asympOp_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} (H : V n → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V n → V n →L[ℝ] V n) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J) (P : ReebOrbit H) :
    (∀ Φ : ℝ → V n →L[ℝ] V n, IsLinReebFlow P Φ → ∀ η : ℝ → V n, IsXiLoop P η →
      ((∀ t : ℝ, asympOp J P η t = 0) ↔ ∀ t : ℝ, η t = Φ (P.T * t) (η 0))) ∧
    (P.IsNondegenerate ↔
      ∀ η : ℝ → V n, IsXiLoop P η → (∀ t : ℝ, asympOp J P η t = 0) → ∀ t : ℝ, η t = 0) := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Systems of global surfaces of section for dynamically convex Reeb flows on the 3-sphere, J. Symplectic Geom. 12 (2014), arXiv:1105.2077, Definition 2.5; C. Wendl, Lectures on Symplectic Field Theory, lecture notes, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2026 version); earlier version arXiv:1612.01009, Section 3.1
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Read-back: FiniteEnergyPlane.asympOp_eq_zero_iff

Setting. Fix n∈Nn \in \mathbb Nn∈N (including n=0n = 0n=0) and let V=R2n+2V = \mathbb R^{2n+2}V=R2n+2 with coordinates v0,…,v2n+1v_0, \dots, v_{2n+1}v0​,…,v2n+1​. Write (j0v)2i=−v2i+1(j_0 v)_{2i} = -v_{2i+1}(j0​v)2i​=−v2i+1​, (j0v)2i+1=v2i(j_0 v)_{2i+1} = v_{2i}(j0​v)2i+1​=v2i​, ⟨u,v⟩=∑kukvk\langle u, v\rangle = \sum_k u_k v_k⟨u,v⟩=∑k​uk​vk​, and

ω0(u,v)=⟨j0u,v⟩=∑i(u2iv2i+1−u2i+1v2i),λx(v)=12 ω0(x,v).\omega_0(u, v) = \langle j_0 u, v\rangle = \sum_i \bigl(u_{2i} v_{2i+1} - u_{2i+1} v_{2i}\bigr), \qquad \lambda_x(v) = \tfrac12\, \omega_0(x, v).ω0​(u,v)=⟨j0​u,v⟩=i∑​(u2i​v2i+1​−u2i+1​v2i​),λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v).

For H:V→RH : V \to \mathbb RH:V→R, dHxdH_xdHx​ is the Fréchet derivative at xxx (the zero map where HHH is not differentiable), ∇H(x)=(dHx(ek))k\nabla H(x) = (dH_x(e_k))_k∇H(x)=(dHx​(ek​))k​, XH=j0∇HX_H = j_0 \nabla HXH​=j0​∇H, and the Reeb field is R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1XH(x)R(x) = \lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1} X_H(x)R(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x) with 0−1=00^{-1} = 00−1=0; DR(x)DR(x)DR(x) is its Fréchet derivative (zero where RRR is not differentiable). For x∈Vx \in Vx∈V, ξx={v:λx(v)=0, dHx(v)=0}\xi_x = \{v : \lambda_x(v) = 0,\ dH_x(v) = 0\}ξx​={v:λx​(v)=0, dHx​(v)=0}.

Hypotheses.

  • HHH is strictly star-shaped: HHH is C∞C^\inftyC∞; for every u≠0u \neq 0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r > 0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(r u) = 1H(ru)=1; and dHx(x)>0dH_x(x) > 0dHx​(x)>0 whenever H(x)=1H(x) = 1H(x)=1.
  • JJJ assigns to each x∈Vx \in Vx∈V a linear map Jx:V→VJ_x : V \to VJx​:V→V, and JJJ is compatible with ξ\xiξ: x↦Jxx \mapsto J_xx↦Jx​ is C∞C^\inftyC∞, and for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x) = 1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv, w \in \xi_xv,w∈ξx​:
Jxv∈ξx,JxJxv=−v,v≠0⇒ω0(v,Jxv)>0,ω0(Jxv,Jxw)=ω0(v,w).J_x v \in \xi_x, \quad J_x J_x v = -v, \quad v \neq 0 \Rightarrow \omega_0(v, J_x v) > 0, \quad \omega_0(J_x v, J_x w) = \omega_0(v, w).Jx​v∈ξx​,Jx​Jx​v=−v,v=0⇒ω0​(v,Jx​v)>0,ω0​(Jx​v,Jx​w)=ω0​(v,w).
  • PPP is a Reeb orbit of HHH: xP:R→Vx_P : \mathbb R \to VxP​:R→V and TP>0T_P > 0TP​>0 with H(xP(τ))=1H(x_P(\tau)) = 1H(xP​(τ))=1, xP′(τ)=R(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau) = R(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=R(xP​(τ)) and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau + T_P) = x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ.

Terms used in the conclusion.

  • A linearised Reeb flow along PPP is Φ:R→L(V,V)\Phi : \mathbb R \to \mathrm L(V,V)Φ:R→L(V,V) with Φ(0)=id\Phi(0) = \mathrm{id}Φ(0)=id and Φ′(τ)=DR(xP(τ))∘Φ(τ)\Phi'(\tau) = DR(x_P(\tau)) \circ \Phi(\tau)Φ′(τ)=DR(xP​(τ))∘Φ(τ) for every τ\tauτ.
  • A ξ\xiξ-loop along PPP is a C∞C^\inftyC∞, 111-periodic η:R→V\eta : \mathbb R \to Vη:R→V with η(t)∈ξxP(TPt)\eta(t) \in \xi_{x_P(T_P t)}η(t)∈ξxP​(TP​t)​ for all ttt.
  • The asymptotic operator: (Aη)(t)=JxP(TPt)(−η′(t)+TP DR(xP(TPt)) η(t))(A\eta)(t) = J_{x_P(T_P t)}\bigl( -\eta'(t) + T_P\, DR(x_P(T_P t))\, \eta(t) \bigr)(Aη)(t)=JxP​(TP​t)​(−η′(t)+TP​DR(xP​(TP​t))η(t)).
  • PPP is nondegenerate if for every linearised Reeb flow Φ\PhiΦ and every v∈ξxP(0)v \in \xi_{x_P(0)}v∈ξxP​(0)​, Φ(TP)v=v\Phi(T_P) v = vΦ(TP​)v=v implies v=0v = 0v=0.

Conclusion. Both of the following hold.

  1. For every linearised Reeb flow Φ\PhiΦ along PPP and every ξ\xiξ-loop η\etaη along PPP:
((Aη)(t)=0 for all t)  ⟺  (η(t)=Φ(TPt) η(0) for all t).\Bigl( (A\eta)(t) = 0 \text{ for all } t \Bigr) \iff \Bigl( \eta(t) = \Phi(T_P t)\, \eta(0) \text{ for all } t \Bigr).((Aη)(t)=0 for all t)⟺(η(t)=Φ(TP​t)η(0) for all t).
P is nondegenerate  ⟺  every ξ-loop η along P with Aη≡0 satisfies η≡0.P \text{ is nondegenerate} \iff \text{every } \xi\text{-loop } \eta \text{ along } P \text{ with } A\eta \equiv 0 \text{ satisfies } \eta \equiv 0.P is nondegenerate⟺every ξ-loop η along P with Aη≡0 satisfies η≡0.

In part 1 the equivalence is asserted for each linearised flow separately (if none existed, part 1 would be vacuous). Both parts concern only ξ\xiξ-loops, i.e. smooth 111-periodic sections of ξ\xiξ along t↦xP(TPt)t \mapsto x_P(T_P t)t↦xP​(TP​t).

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me