Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (9), p. 4 — S(n) = ⋃_{a,b} S_ab ∪ S(n−1), the S_ab pairwise disjoint, and S_ab ≅ S(n−2) via f_ab

Proved
PTCommutant.OperatorBasis.eq_9

by mikedeng1 · Oct 21, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

p2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1permutation-operatorssymmetric-group

Fix π1,…,πn−1∈S(n−1)\pi_1,\dots,\pi_{n-1}\in S(n-1)π1​,…,πn−1​∈S(n−1) with πk(n−1)=k\pi_k(n-1)=kπk​(n−1)=k, and let fab(σ)=πb∘σ∘(n n−1)∘πa−1f_{ab}(\sigma)=\pi_b\circ\sigma\circ(n\ n-1)\circ\pi_a^{-1}fab​(σ)=πb​∘σ∘(n n−1)∘πa−1​ for σ∈S(n−2)\sigma\in S(n-2)σ∈S(n−2) and a,b∈{1,…,n−1}a,b\in\{1,\dots,n-1\}a,b∈{1,…,n−1} (eq. (7)). Put Sab=fab(S(n−2))S_{ab}=f_{ab}(S(n-2))Sab​=fab​(S(n−2)). Then

  1. every τ∈S(n)\tau\in S(n)τ∈S(n) with τ(n)≠n\tau(n)\neq nτ(n)=n equals fab(σ)f_{ab}(\sigma)fab​(σ) for exactly one triple (a,b,σ)(a,b,\sigma)(a,b,σ);
  2. fab(σ)(n)≠nf_{ab}(\sigma)(n)\neq nfab​(σ)(n)=n for every triple;
  3. τ(n)=n\tau(n)=nτ(n)=n if and only if τ∈S(n−1)\tau\in S(n-1)τ∈S(n−1).

Together these say

S(n)=⋃a,b=1n−1Sab ∪ S(n−1),Sab∩Scd=∅ for ab≠cd,S(n)=\bigcup_{a,b=1}^{n-1}S_{ab}\,\cup\,S(n-1),\qquad S_{ab}\cap S_{cd}=\emptyset\ \text{for }ab\neq cd,S(n)=a,b=1⋃n−1​Sab​∪S(n−1),Sab​∩Scd​=∅ for ab=cd,

with the union disjoint from S(n−1)S(n-1)S(n−1), and that each fabf_{ab}fab​ is a bijection S(n−2)→SabS(n-2)\to S_{ab}S(n−2)→Sab​. This partition is what lets Theorem 9(b) cover every partially transposed permutation operator outside C[S(n−1)]\mathbb C[S(n-1)]C[S(n−1)].

Formalization Note. n=m+2n=m+2n=m+2; labels are Fin (m+1), system nnn is Fin.last (m+1), and S(n−1)S(n-1)S(n−1) is the range of liftPerm (m+1) 1. Clause 1 is an ∃! over triples in Fin (m+1) × Fin (m+1) × Equiv.Perm (Fin m), which encodes covering, pairwise disjointness and injectivity of each fabf_{ab}fab​ at once.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_PTCommutant_OperatorBasis_Model
Formal statement
namespace PTCommutant.OperatorBasis

theorem eq_9 {m : ℕ} (π : Fin (m + 1) → Equiv.Perm (Fin (m + 1)))
    (hπ : ∀ k, π k (Fin.last m) = k) :
    (∀ τ : Equiv.Perm (Fin (m + 2)), τ (Fin.last (m + 1)) ≠ Fin.last (m + 1) →
      ∃! t : Fin (m + 1) × Fin (m + 1) × Equiv.Perm (Fin m), fPerm π t.1 t.2.1 t.2.2 = τ) ∧
    (∀ (a b : Fin (m + 1)) (σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin m)),
      fPerm π a b σ (Fin.last (m + 1)) ≠ Fin.last (m + 1)) ∧
    (∀ τ : Equiv.Perm (Fin (m + 2)),
      τ (Fin.last (m + 1)) = Fin.last (m + 1) ↔ τ ∈ Set.range (liftPerm (m + 1) 1)) := by sorry

end PTCommutant.OperatorBasis
Source
Studziński, Horodecki, Mozrzymas, Commutant structuture of U⊗(n−1)⊗U* transformations, arXiv:1305.6183v2, p. 4, eq. (9) and the sentence following it; eq. (7) p. 4; Definition 24 p. 15
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 21, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me