Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Structure and weights of attaining isotropic decompositions

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P21.optimal_ensembles

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let d≥3d\ge3d≥3, F∈[0,1]F\in[0,1]F∈[0,1], a=4(d−1)/d2a=4(d-1)/d^2a=4(d−1)/d2, t=2(2d−3)/(d(d−1))t=2(2d-3)/(d(d-1))t=2(2d−3)/(d(d−1)), and M=2(d−1)/dM=2(d-1)/dM=2(d−1)/d. For the isotropic density ρd,F\rho_{d,F}ρd,F​, an attaining finite normalized tangle ensemble exists whose positive-weight pure states all have tangle τ(ρd,F)\tau(\rho_{d,F})τ(ρd,F​) when F≤aF\le aF≤a, and have tangles in {t,M}\{t,M\}{t,M} when F>aF>aF>a. In the latter case the total weights of these two tangle classes are respectively

wt=1−F1−a,wM=F−a1−a.w_t=\frac{1-F}{1-a},\qquad w_M=\frac{F-a}{1-a}.wt​=1−a1−F​,wM​=1−aF−a​.

There is also an attaining concurrence ensemble using only normalized product states or maximally entangled states at positive weights. Its total maximally entangled weight is

wmax⁡={0F≤1/d,(dF−1)/(d−1)F>1/d.w_{\max}=\begin{cases}0&F\le1/d,\\(dF-1)/(d-1)&F>1/d.\end{cases}wmax​={0(dF−1)/(d−1)​F≤1/d,F>1/d.​

Zero-weight members impose no type restriction. At F=1F=1F=1 only maximal entanglement need have positive weight; below the separability threshold common tangle is zero.

These are existence statements about constructed optimizers, rather than claims about every optimal ensemble.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P21
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P21

open scoped Matrix ComplexConjugate

open Filter

open QAlgorithms

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P03
  (PureEnsemble convexRoof pureConcurrence concurrence SchmidtData schmidtVector)

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

/-- PDF p.13: existence of attaining isotropic decompositions with common
tangle below the breakpoint, two allowed tangle values above, and product/maximal
concurrence components. No universal classification of optimal ensembles is claimed. -/
theorem optimal_ensembles (d : ℕ) (hd : 3 ≤ d) (F : ℝ) (hF : F ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
    (∃ e : PureEnsemble (Fin d × Fin d), IsOptimalPureEnsemble pureTangle (isotropicDensityAtFidelity d F) e ∧
      (∀ k, 0 < e.weight k →
        if F ≤ tangentPoint d then pureTangle (e.vector k) = tangle (isotropicDensityAtFidelity d F)
        else pureTangle (e.vector k) = 2*(2*(d : ℝ)-3)/((d : ℝ)*((d : ℝ)-1)) ∨
          pureTangle (e.vector k) = 2*((d : ℝ)-1)/d) ∧
      (tangentPoint d < F →
        (∑ k, if pureTangle (e.vector k) = 2*(2*(d : ℝ)-3)/((d : ℝ)*((d : ℝ)-1))
          then e.weight k else 0) = (1-F)/(1-tangentPoint d) ∧
        (∑ k, if pureTangle (e.vector k) = 2*((d : ℝ)-1)/d then e.weight k else 0) =
          (F-tangentPoint d)/(1-tangentPoint d))) ∧
    (∃ e : PureEnsemble (Fin d × Fin d), IsOptimalPureEnsemble pureConcurrence (isotropicDensityAtFidelity d F) e ∧
      (∀ k, 0 < e.weight k → IsPureProductState (e.vector k) ∨ IsMaximallyEntangled (e.vector k)) ∧
      (∑ k, if IsMaximallyEntangled (e.vector k) then e.weight k else 0) =
        (if F ≤ 1/(d : ℝ) then 0 else ((d : ℝ)*F-1)/((d : ℝ)-1))) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P21

end
Source
I-concurrence and tangle for isotropic states, arXiv:quant-ph/0208002v1, PDF p. 13, §3.4.3: structure of optimal isotropic decompositions
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every natural number d≥3d\ge3d≥3 and every real F∈[0,1]F\in[0,1]F∈[0,1], let Ωd=d−1/2∑i=0d−1∣i,i⟩\Omega_d=d^{-1/2}\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}|i,i\rangleΩd​=d−1/2∑i=0d−1​∣i,i⟩, Φd=∣Ωd⟩⟨Ωd∣\Phi_d=|\Omega_d\rangle\langle\Omega_d|Φd​=∣Ωd​⟩⟨Ωd​∣, and ρF=FΦd+(1−F)(I−Φd)/(d2−1)\rho_F=F\Phi_d+(1-F)(I-\Phi_d)/(d^2-1)ρF​=FΦd​+(1−F)(I−Φd​)/(d2−1). For a unit vector ψ\psiψ, define (Aψ)ij=∑bψ(i,b)ψ(j,b)‾(A_\psi)_{ij}=\sum_b\psi(i,b)\overline{\psi(j,b)}(Aψ​)ij​=∑b​ψ(i,b)ψ(j,b)​, τ(ψ)=2(1−Re⁡tr⁡(Aψ2))\tau(\psi)=2(1-\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(A_\psi^2))τ(ψ)=2(1−Retr(Aψ2​)), and c(ψ)=τ(ψ)c(\psi)=\sqrt{\tau(\psi)}c(ψ)=τ(ψ)​. Define T(σ)T(\sigma)T(σ) and C(σ)C(\sigma)C(σ) as the infima of the respective average costs over finite ensembles of unit vectors with nonnegative weights summing to 111 and average matrix σ\sigmaσ, where (∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣)uv=ψ(u)ψ(v)‾(|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|)_{uv}=\psi(u)\overline{\psi(v)}(∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣)uv​=ψ(u)ψ(v)​. Put

td=4(d−1)d2,ud=2(2d−3)d(d−1),vd=2(d−1)d.t_d=\frac{4(d-1)}{d^2},\qquad u_d=\frac{2(2d-3)}{d(d-1)},\qquad v_d=\frac{2(d-1)}d.td​=d24(d−1)​,ud​=d(d−1)2(2d−3)​,vd​=d2(d−1)​.

There exists a finite ensemble (wk,ψk)(w_k,\psi_k)(wk​,ψk​) averaging to ρF\rho_FρF​ and attaining T(ρF)T(\rho_F)T(ρF​), such that every positive-weight component has τ(ψk)=T(ρF)\tau(\psi_k)=T(\rho_F)τ(ψk​)=T(ρF​) if F≤tdF\le t_dF≤td​, and has τ(ψk)=ud\tau(\psi_k)=u_dτ(ψk​)=ud​ or τ(ψk)=vd\tau(\psi_k)=v_dτ(ψk​)=vd​ if F>tdF>t_dF>td​. In the latter case, the sums of the weights over all components with these respective costs are exactly

∑τ(ψk)=udwk=1−F1−td,∑τ(ψk)=vdwk=F−td1−td.\sum_{\tau(\psi_k)=u_d}w_k=\frac{1-F}{1-t_d}, \qquad \sum_{\tau(\psi_k)=v_d}w_k=\frac{F-t_d}{1-t_d}.τ(ψk​)=ud​∑​wk​=1−td​1−F​,τ(ψk​)=vd​∑​wk​=1−td​F−td​​.

Separately, there exists a finite ensemble averaging to ρF\rho_FρF​ and attaining C(ρF)C(\rho_F)C(ρF​), every positive-weight component of which is either a tensor product of two unit vectors or a vector d−1/2∑i=0d−1ai⊗bid^{-1/2}\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}a_i\otimes b_id−1/2∑i=0d−1​ai​⊗bi​ for orthonormal families (ai)(a_i)(ai​) and (bi)(b_i)(bi​) in Cd\mathbb C^dCd. The total weight of components having the latter form is 000 if F≤1/dF\le1/dF≤1/d, and (dF−1)/(d−1)(dF-1)/(d-1)(dF−1)/(d−1) otherwise. Zero weights are allowed; the component restrictions apply only to strictly positive weights, while the displayed weight sums range over all components.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me