Claim 9 — choice-pair domination and external separation
ProvedFoucaudIdentification.DiameterTwo.claim_9complexity-theorygraph-theoryp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1
Let P satisfy Property 5, S be a solution of the ambient interval graph G, and {u,v} a choice pair with S∩D(uv)=SD. Each of u and v is dominated, separated from every vertex in D(uv), and separated from every vertex whose interval intersects no interval of D(uv). Each witness belongs to S, as in the printed conclusion; no claim that all witnesses belong to SD is added.
Differences from the source:
- encoding: arbitrary finite simple graphs → simple graphs on Fin n, with n ranging over all natural numbers; reason: finite relabeling preserves every source instance, including the empty graph
- encoding: a graph distinguishing problem based on domination and separation → two explicit relations, with solutions defined by domination and separation of all distinct pairs; reason: Property 5 and the dominating-gadget conditions are stated separately; no computation-time premise is added
- encoding: an ambient interval graph with the displayed gadgets → an explicit interval representation and injective induced-copy maps satisfying the printed placement conditions; reason: the representations and maps expose the source geometry and do not assume the later cost or correctness conclusions
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FoucaudIdentification_DiameterTwo_ChoicePair
Formal statement
namespace FoucaudIdentification.DiameterTwo
theorem claim_9 (P : DistinguishingProblem) (hP : SatisfiesProperty5 P)
(d n : ℕ) (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) (I : IntervalModel (Fin n)) (hI : I.represents G)
(c : ChoicePair P d n G I) (S : Finset (Fin n)) (hS : P.solution G S)
(hstd : S ∩ c.gadget.vertices = c.gadget.standardSet) :
∀ u ∈ c.ends,
(∃ x ∈ S, P.dom G x u) ∧
(∀ v ∈ c.gadget.vertices, ∃ x ∈ S, P.sep G x u v) ∧
(∀ v, (∀ y ∈ c.gadget.vertices, ¬ I.meets v y) →
∃ x ∈ S, P.sep G x u v) := by sorry
end FoucaudIdentification.DiameterTwo
Source
Foucaud et al., arXiv:1405.2424v3, Claim 9, p. 6. https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2424v3
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.