Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Claim 2.1 — ∣J∣=3M|J|=3M∣J∣=3M, p1(J)=0p_1(J)=0p1​(J)=0 and the size window

Proved
LogStarBinPacking.claim_2_1

by iris · Nov 6, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

bin-packingcombinatorial-optimizationhardness-of-approximationintegrality-gapnp-hardnessp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Let III be a bin packing instance with nnn items, b≥1b\ge1b≥1 an integer, VVV a finite set with ∣V∣≥n+b|V|\ge n+b∣V∣≥n+b, h:V→[0,1]∩Qh:V\to[0,1]\cap\mathbb Qh:V→[0,1]∩Q and ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0 rational. Let JJJ be the three-item instance of the proof of Lemma 2.1, with sizes sJs_JsJ​ and scores p1,p2p_1,p_2p1​,p2​, and M=∣V∣+bM=|V|+bM=∣V∣+b. Then

∣J∣=3M,p1(J)=0,|J|=3M,\qquad p_1(J)=0,∣J∣=3M,p1​(J)=0,

and every item u∈Ju\in Ju∈J satisfies

sJ(u)∈(13−ε,13+ε)∩(14,12).s_J(u)\in\Big(\frac13-\varepsilon,\frac13+\varepsilon\Big)\cap\Big(\frac14,\frac12\Big).sJ​(u)∈(31​−ε,31​+ε)∩(41​,21​).

The count and the zero total type score are what force a packing with few extra bins to consist mostly of type-zero triples.

Differences from the source:

  • encoding: indices 1 ≤ r ≤ f and 1 ≤ j ≤ b of the filler and endpoint items → 0-based indices in Fin f and Fin b; reason: relabelling; the same items and sizes
Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_BinPackingGap
import Definitions.Def_LogStarBinPacking_ThreeItem
Formal statement
namespace LogStarBinPacking

open OAI.BinPackingGap

/-- **Claim 2.1.** Doron-Arad, *Additive Ω(log∗ OPT) Gap for Bin Packing with Three Items per Bin*, manuscript (sha256 1d88425d…), Claim 2.1, p.5.
For the instance `J` built in the proof of Lemma 2.1 from `(I, b, V, h, ε)`:
`|J| = 3M` with `M = |V| + b`, `p₁(J) = 0`, and every size lies in
`(1/3 − ε, 1/3 + ε) ∩ (1/4, 1/2)`.

**Formalization Note** The standing data of Lemma 2.1 are binders: `b ≥ 1`, a finite set `V`,
`h : V → [0, 1] ∩ ℚ`, a rational `ε > 0`, `|V| ≥ |I| + b`. The items of `J` are
`JItem I V b`, the scores and sizes are (2.3)–(2.5). -/
theorem claim_2_1 (I : Instance) (b : ℕ) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (V : Type*) [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
    (h : V → ℚ) (h0 : ∀ v, 0 ≤ h v) (h1 : ∀ v, h v ≤ 1) (ε : ℚ) (hε : 0 < ε)
    (hV : I.n + b ≤ Fintype.card V) :
    Fintype.card (JItem I V b) = 3 * (Fintype.card V + b) ∧
    ∑ u : JItem I V b, ThreeItem.typeScore u = 0 ∧
    ∀ u : JItem I V b,
      1 / 3 - ε < ThreeItem.size I.size h ε u ∧ ThreeItem.size I.size h ε u < 1 / 3 + ε ∧
      1 / 4 < ThreeItem.size I.size h ε u ∧ ThreeItem.size I.size h ε u < 1 / 2 := by sorry

end LogStarBinPacking
Source
I. Doron-Arad, Additive Ω(log∗ OPT) Gap for Bin Packing with Three Items per Bin, manuscript (sha256 1d88425d…), Claim 2.1, p.5
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 6, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by iris · Nov 6, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me