Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 1 — BWE are exactly the minimizers of Φ\PhiΦ over Q(λ)\mathcal Q(\lambda)Q(λ); the equilibrium edge load is unique

Proved
BayesRouting.VOI.bwe_iff_optimal

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

p2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1potential-gamerouting-gamewardrop-equilibrium

Let λ\lambdaλ be a size vector (λi≥0\lambda^i\ge0λi≥0, ∑iλi=1\sum_i\lambda^i=1∑i​λi=1). A strategy profile qqq is a Bayesian Wardrop equilibrium of Γ(λ)\Gamma(\lambda)Γ(λ) if and only if it is an optimal solution of the convex program

min⁡ Φ(q)s.t.q∈Q(λ).(OPT-Q)\min\ \Phi(q)\quad\text{s.t.}\quad q\in\mathcal Q(\lambda).\qquad(\text{OPT-}\mathcal Q)min Φ(q)s.t.q∈Q(λ).(OPT-Q)

Moreover, all BWE of Γ(λ)\Gamma(\lambda)Γ(λ) induce the same edge load: if q,q′q,q'q,q′ are BWE then we(t)w_e(t)we​(t) computed from qqq equals we(t)w_e(t)we​(t) computed from q′q'q′ for every edge eee and type profile ttt. This is the equilibrium edge load w∗(λ)w^*(\lambda)w∗(λ).

Because equilibrium costs depend on qqq only through the edge load, the uniqueness of w∗(λ)w^*(\lambda)w∗(λ) makes the equilibrium population costs Ci∗(λ)C^{i*}(\lambda)Ci∗(λ) independent of the chosen BWE.

Formalization Note Uniqueness of the edge load relies on the added full-support assumption on the prior.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_BayesRouting_VOI_Game
import Definitions.Def_BayesRouting_VOI_Potential
Formal statement
namespace BayesRouting.VOI

/-- **Theorem 1** (Wu, Amin, Ozdaglar, Oper. Res. 69(1) 2021, p. 154). For a size vector `λ` in
the simplex, a strategy profile is a BWE of `Γ(λ)` if and only if it minimizes `Φ` over `𝒬(λ)`
(OPT-𝒬); and all BWE induce the same edge load `w^*(λ)`. -/
theorem bwe_iff_optimal {I : Type} [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] {T : I → Type} [∀ i, Fintype (T i)]
    [∀ i, DecidableEq (T i)] [∀ i, Nonempty (T i)] {S E R : Type} [Fintype S] [Fintype E]
    [DecidableEq E] [Fintype R] [Nonempty R]
    (G : Game I T S E R) (lam : I → ℝ) (hlam : lam ∈ stdSimplex ℝ I) :
    (∀ q : (i : I) → T i → R → ℝ, IsBWE G lam q ↔
        (q ∈ feasibleStrategies G lam ∧
          ∀ q' ∈ feasibleStrategies G lam, potential G q ≤ potential G q')) ∧
      ∀ q q' : (i : I) → T i → R → ℝ, IsBWE G lam q → IsBWE G lam q' →
        edgeLoad G q = edgeLoad G q' := by sorry

end BayesRouting.VOI
Source
Wu, Amin, Ozdaglar, Value of Information in Bayesian Routing Games, Oper. Res. 69(1) 2021, p. 154, Theorem 1
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me