Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Quadratic phase drift on a signed stable boundary passage

Proved
BianchiIX.scaled_stable_boundary_drift

by trppppp · Nov 5, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

bianchi-ix-era-statisticsdynamical-systems

For real variables p,s,a,b,cp,s,a,b,cp,s,a,b,c, set

K=a2+b2+c2−2(ab+bc+ca),S=p2+s2,C=S+K.K=a^2+b^2+c^2-2(ab+bc+ca),\qquad S=p^2+s^2,\qquad C=S+K.K=a2+b2+c2−2(ab+bc+ca),S=p2+s2,C=S+K.

The shear components and wall rates are

P=Kp−2a2+b2+c2+ab−2bc+ac,P=Kp-2a^2+b^2+c^2+ab-2bc+ac,P=Kp−2a2+b2+c2+ab−2bc+ac, Q=Ks+3(−b2+c2+ab−ac),Q=Ks+\sqrt{3}(-b^2+c^2+ab-ac),Q=Ks+3​(−b2+c2+ab−ac), r1=−S+2p,r2=−S−p+3s,r3=−S−p−3s.r_1=-S+2p,\qquad r_2=-S-p+\sqrt{3}s,\qquad r_3=-S-p-\sqrt{3}s.r1​=−S+2p,r2​=−S−p+3​s,r3​=−S−p−3​s.

These functions define the normalized vacuum Bianchi IX vector field (P,Q,r1a,r2b,r3c)(P,Q,r_1a,r_2b,r_3c)(P,Q,r1​a,r2​b,r3​c). For y=(m,u,v,w)∈R4y=(m,u,v,w)\in\mathbb R^4y=(m,u,v,w)∈R4, define

K(u,v,w)=u2+v2+w2−2(uv+vw+wu),κ=u(v+w−u),K(u,v,w)=u^2+v^2+w^2-2(uv+vw+wu),\qquad \kappa=u(v+w-u),K(u,v,w)=u2+v2+w2−2(uv+vw+wu),κ=u(v+w−u), Fm=−v2+w2+u(v−w)−mκ,Fu=12(1−m2−(v−w)2+u2)u,F_m=-v^2+w^2+u(v-w)-m\kappa,\qquad F_u=\tfrac12(1-m^2-(v-w)^2+u^2)u,Fm​=−v2+w2+u(v−w)−mκ,Fu​=21​(1−m2−(v−w)2+u2)u, Fv=(m−1−κ)v,Fw=(−m−1−κ)w,F=(Fm,Fu,Fv,Fw),F_v=(m-1-\kappa)v,\qquad F_w=(-m-1-\kappa)w,\qquad F=(F_m,F_u,F_v,F_w),Fv​=(m−1−κ)v,Fw​=(−m−1−κ)w,F=(Fm​,Fu​,Fv​,Fw​),

and E(m,v)=(m−1)2+v2E(m,v)=(m-1)^2+v^2E(m,v)=(m−1)2+v2.

For x=(p,s,a,b,c)x=(p,s,a,b,c)x=(p,s,a,b,c), put

ψ(p,z)=3 z1+p,Π(x)=(ψ(p,s),ψ(p,a),ψ(p,b),ψ(p,c)).\psi(p,z)=\frac{\sqrt3\,z}{1+p},\qquad \Pi(x)=(\psi(p,s),\psi(p,a),\psi(p,b),\psi(p,c)).ψ(p,z)=1+p3​z​,Π(x)=(ψ(p,s),ψ(p,a),ψ(p,b),ψ(p,c)).

For y=(m,u,v,w)y=(m,u,v,w)y=(m,u,v,w), set D(y)=3+m2+K(u,v,w)D(y)=3+m^2+K(u,v,w)D(y)=3+m2+K(u,v,w) and

ΞA(y)=(A−1,Am3,Au3,Av3,Aw3),Ξ(y)=Ξ6/D(y)(y).\Xi_A(y)=\left(A-1,\frac{Am}{\sqrt3},\frac{Au}{\sqrt3}, \frac{Av}{\sqrt3},\frac{Aw}{\sqrt3}\right),\qquad \Xi(y)=\Xi_{6/D(y)}(y).ΞA​(y)=(A−1,3​Am​,3​Au​,3​Av​,3​Aw​),Ξ(y)=Ξ6/D(y)​(y).

Write N(x)=(P,Q,r1a,r2b,r3c)N(x)=(P,Q,r_1a,r_2b,r_3c)N(x)=(P,Q,r1​a,r2​b,r3​c) for the normalized vector field and C(x)=C(p,s,a,b,c)\mathcal C(x)=C(p,s,a,b,c)C(x)=C(p,s,a,b,c) for its constraint.

The normalized and projective state spaces are R5\mathbb R^5R5 and R4\mathbb R^4R4 with their finite-product norms. The maps Π,Ξ,D,F\Pi,\Xi,D,FΠ,Ξ,D,F act on these state spaces.

The projective vector field in normalized time is

G(y)=6D(y)F(y).G(y)=\frac6{D(y)}F(y).G(y)=D(y)6​F(y).

Write X=R5X=\mathbb R^5X=R5, Y=R4Y=\mathbb R^4Y=R4, and let αx,t0\alpha_{x,t_0}αx,t0​​ be the maximal solution of α′=N(α)\alpha'=N(\alpha)α′=N(α) with initial value xxx at t0t_0t0​ and domain Imax⁡(x,t0)I_{\max}(x,t_0)Imax​(x,t0​). Put

Jx,t0(t)=dxαx,t0(t),Ψt0(y,t)=Π(αΞ(y),t0(t)),J_{x,t_0}(t)=d_x\alpha_{x,t_0}(t),\qquad \Psi_{t_0}(y,t)=\Pi(\alpha_{\Xi(y),t_0}(t)),Jx,t0​​(t)=dx​αx,t0​​(t),Ψt0​​(y,t)=Π(αΞ(y),t0​​(t)), Jy,t0(t)=dΠαΞ(y),t0(t)∘JΞ(y),t0(t)∘dΞy.\mathcal J_{y,t_0}(t)=d\Pi_{\alpha_{\Xi(y),t_0}(t)} \circ J_{\Xi(y),t_0}(t)\circ d\Xi_y.Jy,t0​​(t)=dΠαΞ(y),t0​​(t)​∘JΞ(y),t0​​(t)∘dΞy​.

On the invariant plane with zero active wall, use y=(m,u,w)∈R3y=(m,u,w)\in\mathbb R^3y=(m,u,w)∈R3, the inclusion ι(m,u,w)=(m,u,0,w)\iota(m,u,w)=(m,u,0,w)ι(m,u,w)=(m,u,0,w) and the restriction πs(m,u,v,w)=(m,u,w)\pi_s(m,u,v,w)=(m,u,w)πs​(m,u,v,w)=(m,u,w). Define

f(y)=(mu2−(m+1)uw+w2,1−m2−w2+u22u,−(m+1+uw−u2)w),f(y)=\left(mu^2-(m+1)uw+w^2, \frac{1-m^2-w^2+u^2}{2}u,-(m+1+uw-u^2)w\right),f(y)=(mu2−(m+1)uw+w2,21−m2−w2+u2​u,−(m+1+uw−u2)w), Δ(y)=3+m2+(u−w)2,fo(y)=6f(y)/Δ(y).\Delta(y)=3+m^2+(u-w)^2,\qquad f_o(y)=6f(y)/\Delta(y).Δ(y)=3+m2+(u−w)2,fo​(y)=6f(y)/Δ(y).

Write J=dfJ=dfJ=df, H=d2fH=d^2fH=d2f, Jo=dfoJ_o=df_oJo​=dfo​, Ho=d2foH_o=d^2f_oHo​=d2fo​ for their explicit Jacobian and Hessian expressions. The denominator derivatives are dΔ=(2m,2(u−w),2(w−u))d\Delta=(2m,2(u-w),2(w-u))dΔ=(2m,2(u−w),2(w−u)) and d2Δ(v,z)=2v0z0+2(v1−v2)(z1−z2)d^2\Delta(v,z)=2v_0z_0+2(v_1-v_2)(z_1-z_2)d2Δ(v,z)=2v0​z0​+2(v1​−v2​)(z1​−z2​). The exact original-time boundary flow and its projected variation are

Φ(y,t)=πsΨ0(ιy,t),L(y,t)=πsJιy,0(t)ι.\Phi(y,t)=\pi_s\Psi_0(\iota y,t),\qquad L(y,t)=\pi_s\mathcal J_{\iota y,0}(t)\iota.Φ(y,t)=πs​Ψ0​(ιy,t),L(y,t)=πs​Jιy,0​(t)ι.

For a fixed scale KKK, set ΦK(y,s)=Φ(y,Ks)\Phi_K(y,s)=\Phi(y,Ks)ΦK​(y,s)=Φ(y,Ks), LK(y,s)=L(y,Ks)L_K(y,s)=L(y,Ks)LK​(y,s)=L(y,Ks) and QK(y,s)=dyLK(y,s)Q_K(y,s)=d_yL_K(y,s)QK​(y,s)=dy​LK​(y,s). For directions v,zv,zv,z, define

SK(y,s;v,z)=K[Ho(ΦK)(LKv,LKz)+Jo(ΦK)QK(v,z)].S_K(y,s;v,z)=K\left[H_o(\Phi_K)(L_Kv,L_Kz)+J_o(\Phi_K)Q_K(v,z)\right].SK​(y,s;v,z)=K[Ho​(ΦK​)(LK​v,LK​z)+Jo​(ΦK​)QK​(v,z)].

All vector norms are sup norms, and operator norms are induced by them. Write b(y)=∣u∣+∣w∣b(y)=|u|+|w|b(y)=∣u∣+∣w∣, E(y)=e512b(y)E(y)=e^{512b(y)}E(y)=e512b(y), vs=(v1,v2)v_s=(v_1,v_2)vs​=(v1​,v2​), and

H(y;v,z)=b(y)∥v∥∥z∥+∥vs∥∥z∥+∥v∥∥zs∥,\mathcal H(y;v,z)=b(y)\|v\|\|z\|+\|v_s\|\|z\|+\|v\|\|z_s\|,H(y;v,z)=b(y)∥v∥∥z∥+∥vs​∥∥z∥+∥v∥∥zs​∥, B2(y)=192b(y)(40000E(y)3)+10000E(y)2.B_2(y)=192b(y)(40000E(y)^3)+10000E(y)^2.B2​(y)=192b(y)(40000E(y)3)+10000E(y)2.

The closed boundary region is Sc={(m,u,0,w):∣m−c∣≤1/10, ∣u∣,∣w∣≤1/100}\mathcal S_c=\{(m,u,0,w):|m-c|\leq1/10,\ |u|,|w|\leq1/100\}Sc​={(m,u,0,w):∣m−c∣≤1/10, ∣u∣,∣w∣≤1/100}. The boundary projection P(m,u,w)P(m,u,w)P(m,u,w) is the limit of Φ(m,u,w;t)0\Phi(m,u,w;t)_0Φ(m,u,w;t)0​ as t→∞t\to\inftyt→∞, using the total limit convention of the formal definitions. Let a≤ta\leq ta≤t, c≥2c\geq2c≥2, Y′=hF(Y)Y'=hF(Y)Y′=hF(Y) on [a,t][a,t][a,t], with continuous h≥0h\geq0h≥0. Suppose z′=(c+1)hz'=(c+1)hz′=(c+1)h and Y(r)∈ScY(r)\in\mathcal S_cY(r)∈Sc​ throughout this interval. Then

∣Y0(t)−Y0(a)∣≤8(∣Y1(a)∣+∣Y3(a)∣)2c+1.|Y_0(t)-Y_0(a)|\leq\frac{8(|Y_1(a)|+|Y_3(a)|)^2}{c+1}.∣Y0​(t)−Y0​(a)∣≤c+18(∣Y1​(a)∣+∣Y3​(a)∣)2​.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Algebra_Projective
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Dynamics_ProjectiveState
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_CompactPhaseExpansionData
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Arsinh
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Operations
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.FunProp
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Arcosh
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.InverseFunctionTheorem.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.MeanValue
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.ODE.ExistUnique
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Partial
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.DistLEIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.ODE.Gronwall
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul

noncomputable section
open BianchiIX
open Set MeasureTheory

Formal statement
theorem BianchiIX.scaled_stable_boundary_drift {Y : ℝ → ProjectiveState} {a z : ℝ → ℝ}
    {s t c : ℝ} (hst : s ≤ t) (hc : 2 ≤ c)
    (hY : ∀ r ∈ Icc s t, HasDerivAt Y (a r • projectiveField (Y r)) r)
    (hz : ∀ r ∈ Icc s t, HasDerivAt z ((c + 1) * a r) r)
    (hac : ContinuousOn a (Icc s t)) (ha : ∀ r ∈ Icc s t, 0 ≤ a r)
    (hv : ∀ r ∈ Icc s t, Y r 2 = 0)
    (hm : ∀ r ∈ Icc s t, |Y r 0 - c| ≤ 1 / 10)
    (hu : ∀ r ∈ Icc s t, |Y r 1| ≤ 1 / 100)
    (hw : ∀ r ∈ Icc s t, |Y r 3| ≤ 1 / 100) :
    |Y t 0 - Y s 0| ≤ 8 * (|Y s 1| + |Y s 3|) ^ 2 / (c + 1) := by sorry
Source
https://github.com/l46430640-del/ERA-STATISTICS-FORMAL/blob/d74c241819f896ab8d050b21ace80c8e90eabd9e/BianchiIX/Dynamics/StableBoundaryDecay.lean#L47-L133

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me