Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Global finite-container reduction

Open
KeplerMission.finite_container_of_annulus

by Minghui · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib c5ea003 (Lean v4.30.0)

discrete-geometrykeplersphere-packing

Assume validity of the fixed nonlinear catalog and the annulus bound for every finite separated set in the closed norm range [2, 63/25]. Then every saturated packing has a real constant c such that its count in the open radius-r ball is at most πr³/√18 + cr² for every real r≥1. Saturation is explicitly removed by the foundation milestone in the final assembly.

N ⟹ (A ⟹ ∀V, Pack⁡(V)∧Sat⁡(V)⟹FC⁡(V)).\mathcal N\ \Longrightarrow\ \bigl(\mathcal A\ \Longrightarrow\ \forall V,\ \operatorname{Pack}(V)\land\operatorname{Sat}(V)\Longrightarrow\operatorname{FC}(V)\bigr).N ⟹ (A ⟹ ∀V, Pack(V)∧Sat(V)⟹FC(V)).

Here N denotes complete catalog validity, A the local annulus theorem, and FC the stated finite-container estimate.

Source. Hales et al., A Formal Proof of the Kepler Conjecture (2017), https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2017.1, §4.2 p.9 and §4.5 p.12; Blueprint OXLZLEZ Theorem6.93, RDWKARC Corollary6.100, DLWCHEM Lemma6.110 (extended PDF pp.199,201,207); formal source general/the_main_statement.hl:110–132.

Formalization note. Source-derived interface or explicitly identified analytic corollary; no proof of the target is supplied by defining its proposition.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_Kepler_MissionContracts
set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
namespace KeplerMission
theorem finite_container_of_annulus : Nonlinear.CatalogValid → AnnulusContract → SaturatedContainerContract := by sorry
end KeplerMission
Source
Hales et al., A Formal Proof of the Kepler Conjecture (2017), https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2017.1; §4.2 p.9 and §4.5 p.12; Blueprint OXLZLEZ Theorem6.93, RDWKARC Corollary6.100, DLWCHEM Lemma6.110 (extended PDF pp.199,201,207); formal source general/the_main_statement.hl:110–132; https://github.com/flyspeck/flyspeck/blob/1ce0353008eba83d3c76ae9a25c3c242e4802d53/text_formalization/general/the_main_statement.hl; https://publicationsthomashales.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/densespherepackings.pdf
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6

This defines, without proving, the implication that if the entire nonlinear catalog is valid and if every finite packing in the closed annulus 2≤∥v∥≤63/252\leq\|v\|\leq63/252≤∥v∥≤63/25 has score ∑v(63−25∥v∥)/13≤12\sum_v(63-25\|v\|)/13\leq12∑v​(63−25∥v∥)/13≤12, then every saturated packing V⊆R3V\subseteq\mathbb R^3V⊆R3 has some real constant ccc such that NV(0,r)≤πr3/18+cr2N_V(0,r)\leq\pi r^3/\sqrt{18}+cr^2NV​(0,r)≤πr3/18​+cr2 for every real r≥1r\geq1r≥1. Saturation means every ambient point is within distance strictly less than 222 of a center, and the packing separation is at least 222. The two premises are global universal propositions, not premises about a particular VVV. The conclusion permits a different, possibly negative ccc for each VVV. It does not independently assert either premise or this conclusion without them.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Minghui · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me