Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

A unitary frame along a Reeb orbit homotopic to the global frame

Proved
FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_unitaryXiFrame_hasXiLoopWind_iff

by Mazecto · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

conley-zehnder-indexpseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectizationwinding-numbers

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ. For every periodic Reeb orbit P=(x,T)P=(x,T)P=(x,T) there is a unitary frame ZZZ of ξ\xiξ along PPP such that for every continuous 111-periodic nowhere-vanishing ζ:R→R2\zeta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^2ζ:R→R2 and every k∈Zk\in\mathbb{Z}k∈Z: the loop t↦Z(t)ζ(t)t\mapsto Z(t)\zeta(t)t↦Z(t)ζ(t) has winding kkk in the global frame if and only if ζ\zetaζ has winding kkk as a loop in C\mathbb{C}C.

Formalization Note Unitary frames are IsUnitaryXiFrame J P Z of FiniteEnergyPlane_Asymptotics; R2→C\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{C}R2→C is (q,p)↦q+ip(q,p)\mapsto q+ip(q,p)↦q+ip (vecToC).

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz, Remark 2.6, for `n = 1`: along every periodic Reeb orbit `P` there is a unitary
frame `Z` of `ξ` that is homotopic to the global frame `Z₁, Z₂`, in the sense that a loop
`t ↦ Z(t) ζ(t)` has the same winding number in the global frame as `ζ` has in `ℝ² = ℂ`. -/
theorem exists_unitaryXiFrame_hasXiLoopWind_iff (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J) (P : ReebOrbit H) :
    ∃ Z : ℝ → CauchyRiemannIndex.Vec 1 →L[ℝ] V 1, IsUnitaryXiFrame J P Z ∧
      ∀ ζ : ℝ → CauchyRiemannIndex.Vec 1, Continuous ζ → Function.Periodic ζ 1 →
        (∀ t : ℝ, ζ t ≠ 0) → ∀ k : ℤ,
          (HasXiLoopWind P (fun t => Z t (ζ t)) k ↔ HasLoopWind (fun t => vecToC (ζ t)) k) := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Systems of global surfaces of section for dynamically convex Reeb flows on the 3-sphere, J. Symplectic Geom. 12 (2014), arXiv:1105.2077, Remark 2.6 and Remark 2.13
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Theorem FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_unitaryXiFrame_hasXiLoopWind_iff

Work in V=R4V = \mathbb{R}^4V=R4 (coordinates x0,…,x3x_0,\dots,x_3x0​,…,x3​) with ω0(u,v)=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2\omega_0(u,v) = u_0v_1 - u_1v_0 + u_2v_3 - u_3v_2ω0​(u,v)=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​, Liouville form λx(v)=12ω0(x,v)\lambda_x(v) = \tfrac12\omega_0(x,v)λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v), and j0(v)=(−v1,v0,−v3,v2)j_0(v) = (-v_1, v_0, -v_3, v_2)j0​(v)=(−v1​,v0​,−v3​,v2​). Write R2\mathbb{R}^2R2 for the Euclidean plane with coordinates (aL,aR)(a_L, a_R)(aL​,aR​), J0(aL,aR)=(−aR,aL)J_0(a_L,a_R) = (-a_R, a_L)J0​(aL​,aR​)=(−aR​,aL​), and ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle⟨⋅,⋅⟩ its standard inner product.

Hypotheses.

  • H:V→RH : V \to \mathbb{R}H:V→R has a strictly star-shaped level set: HHH is C∞C^\inftyC∞; for every u≠0u \ne 0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r > 0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru) = 1H(ru)=1; and dHx(x)>0dH_x(x) > 0dHx​(x)>0 whenever H(x)=1H(x) = 1H(x)=1.
  • J:V→End⁡(V)J : V \to \operatorname{End}(V)J:V→End(V) is a compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ: JJJ is C∞C^\inftyC∞, and for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x) = 1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv, w \in \xi_xv,w∈ξx​ (where v∈ξxv \in \xi_xv∈ξx​ means λx(v)=0\lambda_x(v) = 0λx​(v)=0 and dHx(v)=0dH_x(v) = 0dHx​(v)=0): J(x)v∈ξxJ(x)v \in \xi_xJ(x)v∈ξx​, J(x)2v=−vJ(x)^2 v = -vJ(x)2v=−v, ω0(v,J(x)v)>0\omega_0(v, J(x)v) > 0ω0​(v,J(x)v)>0 if v≠0v \ne 0v=0, and ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J(x)v, J(x)w) = \omega_0(v,w)ω0​(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0​(v,w).
  • PPP is a Reeb orbit of HHH: a map xP:R→Vx_P : \mathbb{R} \to VxP​:R→V and TP>0T_P > 0TP​>0 with H(xP(τ))=1H(x_P(\tau)) = 1H(xP​(τ))=1, xP′(τ)=RH(xP(τ))x_P'(\tau) = R_H(x_P(\tau))xP′​(τ)=RH​(xP​(τ)) and xP(τ+TP)=xP(τ)x_P(\tau + T_P) = x_P(\tau)xP​(τ+TP​)=xP​(τ) for all τ\tauτ, where RH(x)=λx(XH(x))−1XH(x)R_H(x) = \lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1}X_H(x)RH​(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x), XH=j0∇HX_H = j_0\nabla HXH​=j0​∇H. TPT_PTP​ need not be the minimal period (no primality assumed).

Conclusion. There exists Z:R→Lin(R2,V)Z : \mathbb{R} \to \mathrm{Lin}(\mathbb{R}^2, V)Z:R→Lin(R2,V) which is a unitary ξ\xiξ-frame along PPP, namely: ZZZ is C∞C^\inftyC∞ and 111-periodic, and for every ttt, with x=xP(TPt)x = x_P(T_P t)x=xP​(TP​t),

  • Z(t)a∈ξxZ(t)a \in \xi_xZ(t)a∈ξx​ for all a∈R2a \in \mathbb{R}^2a∈R2, and every w∈ξxw \in \xi_xw∈ξx​ equals Z(t)aZ(t)aZ(t)a for some aaa;
  • J(x) Z(t)a=Z(t) J0aJ(x)\,Z(t)a = Z(t)\,J_0 aJ(x)Z(t)a=Z(t)J0​a for all aaa;
  • ω0(Z(t)a,Z(t)b)=⟨J0a,b⟩\omega_0(Z(t)a, Z(t)b) = \langle J_0 a, b\rangleω0​(Z(t)a,Z(t)b)=⟨J0​a,b⟩ for all a,ba, ba,b;

and such that for every continuous, 111-periodic, nowhere-vanishing ζ:R→R2\zeta : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^2ζ:R→R2 and every k∈Zk \in \mathbb{Z}k∈Z:

HasLoopWind(t↦xiCoordC(H, xP(TPt), Z(t)ζ(t)), k)  ⟺  HasLoopWind(t↦ζL(t)+i ζR(t), k).\mathrm{HasLoopWind}\Big(t \mapsto \mathrm{xiCoordC}\big(H,\ x_P(T_P t),\ Z(t)\zeta(t)\big),\ k\Big) \iff \mathrm{HasLoopWind}\big(t \mapsto \zeta_L(t) + i\,\zeta_R(t),\ k\big).HasLoopWind(t↦xiCoordC(H, xP​(TP​t), Z(t)ζ(t)), k)⟺HasLoopWind(t↦ζL​(t)+iζR​(t), k).

Definitions used:

  • HasLoopWind(f,k)\mathrm{HasLoopWind}(f, k)HasLoopWind(f,k) for f:R→Cf : \mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}f:R→C: fff is continuous, 111-periodic, nowhere zero, and there is a continuous θ:R→R\theta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}θ:R→R with f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t)f(t) = |f(t)|e^{i\theta(t)}f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t) for all ttt and θ(1)−θ(0)=2πk\theta(1)-\theta(0) = 2\pi kθ(1)−θ(0)=2πk.
  • xiCoordC(H,x,v)=ω0(v,F2(x))+i ω0(F1(x),v)\mathrm{xiCoordC}(H, x, v) = \omega_0(v, F_2(x)) + i\,\omega_0(F_1(x), v)xiCoordC(H,x,v)=ω0​(v,F2​(x))+iω0​(F1​(x),v), a fixed coordinate system built from HHH alone, where
F1(x)=∣x∣−1(Q2(x)−dHx(Q2(x))dHx(x) x),F2(x)=∣x∣−1(Q1(x)−dHx(Q1(x))dHx(x) x),F_1(x) = |x|^{-1}\Big(Q_2(x) - \tfrac{dH_x(Q_2(x))}{dH_x(x)}\,x\Big),\qquad F_2(x) = |x|^{-1}\Big(Q_1(x) - \tfrac{dH_x(Q_1(x))}{dH_x(x)}\,x\Big),F1​(x)=∣x∣−1(Q2​(x)−dHx​(x)dHx​(Q2​(x))​x),F2​(x)=∣x∣−1(Q1​(x)−dHx​(x)dHx​(Q1​(x))​x),

Q1(x)=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_1(x) = (-x_2, x_3, x_0, -x_1)Q1​(x)=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), Q2(x)=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_2(x) = (x_3, x_2, -x_1, -x_0)Q2​(x)=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​), ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm (conventions ∣0∣−1=0|0|^{-1} = 0∣0∣−1=0, division by 000 gives 000).

So the frame ZZZ is asserted to exist with the property that, for every nowhere-zero loop ζ\zetaζ in R2\mathbb{R}^2R2, the winding of ζ\zetaζ (viewed in C\mathbb{C}C) equals the winding of ZζZ\zetaZζ read in the fixed coordinates xiCoordC\mathrm{xiCoordC}xiCoordC; the equivalence is required for each integer kkk separately. The existence of a single such ZZZ is asserted for each HHH, JJJ, PPP satisfying the hypotheses; uniqueness is not claimed.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me