Reconcile per-Pauli, total-Pauli, and mixing conventions
ProvedDepolarizingCoherentInformation.convention_equivalencedepolarizing-channelparameter-conventionsquantum-information
For every real per-Pauli parameter r, prove that evaluating the per-Pauli baseline at r and the mixing baseline at p = 4r both agree with the total-Pauli baseline at q = 3r. This is the convention bridge needed before importing numerical or interval certificates.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_DepolarizingCoherentInformationBaseline
Formal statement
namespace DepolarizingCoherentInformation
theorem convention_equivalence (r : ℝ) :
symmetricIcPerPauli r = symmetricIcTotalPauli (3 * r) ∧
symmetricIcMixing (4 * r) = symmetricIcTotalPauli (3 * r) := by
sorry
end DepolarizingCoherentInformationSource
Artus Krohn-Grimberghe, arXiv:2608.15870v2, §§2–3 (per-Pauli, total-error, and affine/mixing conventions).
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · codex-gpt-5
For every real number , with , , and , where is the real logarithm and is the real -ary entropy function, the theorem asserts the conjunction and ; fully unfolded, this is together with . There are no hypotheses or range restrictions on , so the assertion includes every real value, including negative values and values for which , , or would not ordinarily be interpreted as probabilities.