Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Tree-level gauge boson masses from the Higgs vacuum

Proved
ElectroweakWiki.gauge_boson_mass_terms

by Lucas · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

electroweakmathematical-physics

Let g>0g>0g>0, g′>0g'>0g′>0 and v∈Rv\in\mathbb Rv∈R, and let θW=arctan⁡(g′/g)\theta_W = \arctan(g'/g)θW​=arctan(g′/g). For real gauge field values W1,W2,W3,BW_1, W_2, W_3, BW1​,W2​,W3​,B (one spacetime point, one Lorentz component) let

M=g′2B 1+g2(W1σ1+W2σ2+W3σ3)M = \frac{g'}{2}B\,\mathbb 1 + \frac g2\left(W_1\sigma_1 + W_2\sigma_2 + W_3\sigma_3\right)M=2g′​B1+2g​(W1​σ1​+W2​σ2​+W3​σ3​)

be the gauge part of the covariant derivative Dμ=∂μ−ig′2YBμ−ig2σjWμjD_\mu = \partial_\mu - i\frac{g'}2YB_\mu - i\frac g2\sigma_jW^j_\muDμ​=∂μ​−i2g′​YBμ​−i2g​σj​Wμj​ on the Higgs doublet (Y=1Y=1Y=1), and let h0=(0,v/2)h_0 = (0, v/\sqrt2)h0​=(0,v/2​) be the Higgs vacuum. With W±=(W1∓iW2)/2W^\pm = (W_1\mp iW_2)/\sqrt2W±=(W1​∓iW2​)/2​, Z0=−sin⁡θWB+cos⁡θWW3Z^0 = -\sin\theta_W B + \cos\theta_W W_3Z0=−sinθW​B+cosθW​W3​, mW=gv/2m_W = gv/2mW​=gv/2 and mZ=g2+g′2 v/2m_Z = \sqrt{g^2+g'^2}\,v/2mZ​=g2+g′2​v/2,

∣Mh0∣2=mW2 W+W−+12 mZ2 (Z0)2.|M h_0|^2 = m_W^2\,W^+W^- + \frac12\,m_Z^2\,(Z^0)^2 .∣Mh0​∣2=mW2​W+W−+21​mZ2​(Z0)2.

The left side is ∣Dμh∣2|D_\mu h|^2∣Dμ​h∣2 evaluated on the vacuum; the right side is the mass part mW2Wμ+W−μ+12mZ2ZμZμm_W^2 W^+_\mu W^{-\mu} + \frac12 m_Z^2 Z_\mu Z^\mumW2​Wμ+​W−μ+21​mZ2​Zμ​Zμ of the quadratic Lagrangian LK\mathcal L_KLK​. The photon γ\gammaγ does not appear, so it remains massless.

Formalization Note ∣x∣2|x|^2∣x∣2 is ∣x1∣2+∣x2∣2|x_1|^2+|x_2|^2∣x1​∣2+∣x2​∣2. The identity is stated in C\mathbb CC (the left side is cast from R\mathbb RR) so that the product W+W−W^+W^-W+W− appears literally.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_ElectroweakWiki_defs
open Matrix
Formal statement
namespace ElectroweakWiki

theorem gauge_boson_mass_terms (g g' v W1 W2 W3 B : ℝ) (hg : 0 < g) (hg' : 0 < g') :
    (doubletNormSq (gaugeTerm g g' 1 B W1 W2 W3 *ᵥ higgsVacuum v) : ℂ) =
      (wMass g v : ℂ) ^ 2 * wPlus W1 W2 * wMinus W1 W2 +
        1 / 2 * (zMass g g' v : ℂ) ^ 2 * (zField (weinbergAngle g g') B W3 : ℂ) ^ 2 := by sorry

end ElectroweakWiki
Source
Wikipedia, "Electroweak interaction", revision oldid=1360331872, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electroweak_interaction&oldid=1360331872; Section 'Before electroweak symmetry breaking' (covariant derivative D_μ and L_h, p. 4 of the PDF) and section 'After electroweak symmetry breaking' (mass terms m_W² W⁺W⁻ + ½ m_Z² Z Z in L_K, p. 4); mass relation of section Formulation (p. 3)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic)

Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted these Lean statements (at the explicit direction of the proposal's owner), not by an independent blind auditor. The author knew the intended meaning while writing it, so it must not be mistaken for independent testimony; reviewers should check it against the Lean code themselves.

For all real g,g′,v,W1,W2,W3,Bg, g', v, W_1, W_2, W_3, Bg,g′,v,W1​,W2​,W3​,B with g>0g>0g>0 and g′>0g'>0g′>0: let θ=arctan⁡(g′/g)\theta = \arctan(g'/g)θ=arctan(g′/g), let MMM be the complex 2×22\times22×2 matrix g′2⋅1⋅B I+g2(W1σ1+W2σ2+W3σ3)\frac{g'}{2}\cdot 1\cdot B\, I + \frac g2(W_1\sigma_1+W_2\sigma_2+W_3\sigma_3)2g′​⋅1⋅BI+2g​(W1​σ1​+W2​σ2​+W3​σ3​) with the explicit Pauli matrices, and let x=M(0,v/2)T∈C2x = M(0, v/\sqrt2)^T\in\mathbb C^2x=M(0,v/2​)T∈C2. The statement asserts the equality of complex numbers

∣x1∣2+∣x2∣2=(gv2)2 W1−iW22⋅W1+iW22+12(g2+g′2 v2)2(−sin⁡θ B+cos⁡θ W3)2,|x_1|^2+|x_2|^2 = \Big(\frac{gv}{2}\Big)^2\,\frac{W_1-iW_2}{\sqrt2}\cdot\frac{W_1+iW_2}{\sqrt2} + \frac12\Big(\frac{\sqrt{g^2+g'^2}\,v}{2}\Big)^2\big(-\sin\theta\,B+\cos\theta\,W_3\big)^2,∣x1​∣2+∣x2​∣2=(2gv​)22​W1​−iW2​​⋅2​W1​+iW2​​+21​(2g2+g′2​v​)2(−sinθB+cosθW3​)2,

where the left side is the real number viewed in C\mathbb CC. No sign condition is placed on vvv.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me