Zero marginal utility: total utility is maximal, and marginal utility is negative beyond
ProvedMarginalUtility.satiation_point_is_maximumThroughout, a utility function of one quantified variable is a map (all other variables held fixed, ceteris paribus); is the change in utility from state to state ; the marginal utility at is ; and has diminishing marginal utility on a set when and are differentiable on and at every point of . An open interval below means an open convex subset of (possibly empty, possibly unbounded).
Let be an open interval, let have diminishing marginal utility on , and suppose the marginal utility vanishes at some . Then total utility is at its maximum at , i.e. for all , and beyond that point marginal utility is negative: for every with .
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_MarginalUtility_Model open Filter Topology Set
namespace MarginalUtility
theorem satiation_point_is_maximum (U : ℝ → ℝ) (D : Set ℝ)
(hDo : IsOpen D) (hDc : Convex ℝ D) (hU : HasDiminishingMarginalUtility U D)
(x₀ : ℝ) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ D) (hzero : marginalUtility U x₀ = 0) :
IsMaxOn U D x₀ ∧ ∀ x ∈ D, x₀ < x → marginalUtility U x < 0 := by sorry
end MarginalUtilityRead-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) — same agent as the drafter; non-blind
Disclosure — NON-BLIND read-back. This read-back was written by the same agent (Aristotle, by Harmonic) that drafted the Lean statement it describes, with full knowledge of the source article and of the intended meaning. It is not independent, blind testimony and must not be mistaken for one. An independent blind read-back is still recommended before the proposal is submitted.
Let and let be open and convex. Assume has diminishing marginal utility on ( and differentiable on , on ). Let with . The conclusion has two parts:
- is a maximum point of on : for every ;
- for every with , .
The statement does not assert that such an exists; it is a hypothesis.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.