Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 1.4 on Rd\mathbb{R}^dRd, granted Theorem 1.1

Proved
QFS.theoremOneFourUniv_of_theoremOneOne

by dbenbenn · Sep 6, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

analysismeasure-theoryquadratic-forms-sobolev

Superseded (2026-09-27). This is only the reduction from Theorem 1.1. The QFS mission uses QFS.theoremOneFour_univ, which states the Rd\mathbb{R}^dRd half of Theorem 1.4 outright.

A bare implication: if TheoremOneOne d holds, then the same comparability holds with the ball replaced by all of Rd\mathbb{R}^dRd —

∣f∣Hα/2(Rd)2  ≤  c ERd[k,f],|f|^2_{H^{\alpha/2}(\mathbb{R}^d)} \;\le\; c\,\mathcal{E}_{\mathbb{R}^d}[k,f],∣f∣Hα/2(Rd)2​≤cERd​[k,f],

for every ϑ\varthetaϑ-admissible Γ\GammaΓ, every kkk with the bounds (2), and every fff that lies in L2L^2L2 of every ball of every positive radius, with c≥1c \ge 1c≥1 depending only on ddd, ϑ\varthetaϑ, Λ\LambdaΛ, α\alphaα.

The trade is exact and is the whole content: the hypothesis quantifies over balls and asks f∈L2f \in L^2f∈L2 of that ball; the conclusion drops the ball quantifiers, integrates over all of space, and correspondingly strengthens the requirement on fff to L2L^2L2 of every ball. Nothing else changes — in particular the right-hand domain is not enlarged, so this is not the …Ball… form.

Both statements use IsAdmissible, i.e. boundedness together with the paper's condition (M) — not the stronger CondMeas of milestones 9, 12–15.

Note fff is not required to lie in L2(Rd)L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)L2(Rd) — only in L2L^2L2 of each ball, which is precisely what is needed to apply the hypothesis on every ball.

Preamble
-- Generated by skeleton subtraction from QuadraticFormsSobolev/Section1.lean
-- source: quadratic-forms-sobolev@7a1a680db212
/-
Section 1 of Bux–Kassmann–Schulze: the quadratic forms, the function spaces
`H_k(Ω)` and `H^{α/2}(Ω)`, assumption (2) on the kernel, the reverse
inequality of Theorem 1.1 (which "trivially holds"), and the inclusion (5).

The two main theorems are also *stated* here, as `Prop`s, so that the targets
are precise and type-checked. `QFS.TheoremOneThree` is proved in `Section6`;
`QFS.TheoremOneOne` is not, and the README records what it still needs.

Theorem 1.4 on `ℝ^d` closes the file. The paper obtains it from Lemma 3.7 "in
the limit `R → ∞` using monotone convergence", the point being that the
comparability constant does not depend on the ball. That deduction needs nothing
from Section 3.2 beyond Theorem 1.1 itself, so it is proved here, conditionally
(`QFS.theoremOneFourUniv_of_theoremOneOne`).
-/
import Definitions.Def_QFS_Translate
import Definitions.Def_QFS_Defs
import Definitions.Def_QFS_ConeGap
import Definitions.Def_QFS_RefCones
import Definitions.Def_QFS_Section4
import Definitions.Def_QFS_Cubes
import Definitions.Def_QFS_Section3
import Definitions.Def_QFS_Section5
import Definitions.Def_QFS_Section1
import Mathlib

set_option autoImplicit true
set_option relaxedAutoImplicit false
set_option maxSynthPendingDepth 3

open Real Set Metric MeasureTheory ENNReal

open QFS

variable {d : ℕ}

/-! ## The kernels and the quadratic forms -/

/-! ## Assumption (2) -/

/-! ## The reverse inequality, and the inclusion (5) -/

/-! ## The statements of Theorems 1.1 and 1.3

These are recorded as `Prop`s so that the targets are precise and type-checked.
`QFS.TheoremOneThree` is proved as `QFS.theoremOneThree` in `Section6`, on top
of Theorem 5.15. `QFS.TheoremOneOne` is not proved: it needs Section 3's
discrete kernel and limiting argument, and a final step the paper quotes from a
Whitney decomposition. See the README. -/

/-! ## Theorem 1.4 on `ℝ^d` -/
Formal statement
theorem QFS.theoremOneFourUniv_of_theoremOneOne (h : TheoremOneOne d) : TheoremOneFourUniv d := by sorry
Source
https://github.com/dbenbenn/quadratic-forms-sobolev/blob/7a1a680db2124d46ce370c91fd450aa454edf491/QuadraticFormsSobolev/Section1.lean#L265-L275
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 6, 2026

  • Endorsed by dbenbenn · Sep 6, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me