Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Fredholm theory of embedded fast finite-energy planes

Open
FiniteEnergyPlane.embedded_fastPlane_fredholm

by Mazecto · Nov 3, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fast-planesfredholm-theorypseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let H0:R4→RH_0:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H0​:R4→R have a strictly star-shaped level (in the sense of HryniewiczCriterion), HHH the same function on V=R2⋅(1+1)V=\mathbb{R}^{2\cdot(1+1)}V=R2⋅(1+1), JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ, P=(x,TP)P=(x,T_P)P=(x,TP​) a periodic Reeb orbit of HHH with μCZ(P)≥3\mu_{CZ}(P)\ge3μCZ​(P)≥3 (PPP may be degenerate), and uuu an embedded fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞. Then proj∘u\mathrm{proj}\circ uproj∘u does not meet x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R) and is a proper embedding of C\mathbb{C}C into S∖x(R)S\setminus x(\mathbb{R})S∖x(R). Moreover, for every l≥1l\ge1l≥1 there are r>0r>0r>0 and a ClC^lCl embedding f:C×Br(0)→R4f:\mathbb{C}\times B_r(0)\to\mathbb{R}^4f:C×Br​(0)→R4 such that

  1. f(⋅,0)=uf(\cdot,0)=uf(⋅,0)=u;
  2. for every τ∈Br(0)\tau\in B_r(0)τ∈Br​(0), f(⋅,τ)f(\cdot,\tau)f(⋅,τ) is an embedded fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞;
  3. if τ0∈Br(0)\tau_0\in B_r(0)τ0​∈Br​(0) and (uk)(u_k)(uk​) is a sequence of embedded fast finite-energy planes asymptotic to PPP at ∞\infty∞ with uk→f(⋅,τ0)u_k\to f(\cdot,\tau_0)uk​→f(⋅,τ0​) in Cloc∞(C)C^\infty_{loc}(\mathbb{C})Cloc∞​(C), then there are τk→τ0\tau_k\to\tau_0τk​→τ0​, Ak→1A_k\to1Ak​→1 and Bk→0B_k\to0Bk​→0 in C\mathbb{C}C such that, for all large kkk, τk∈Br(0)\tau_k\in B_r(0)τk​∈Br​(0) and f(Akz+Bk,τk)=uk(z)f(A_kz+B_k,\tau_k)=u_k(z)f(Ak​z+Bk​,τk​)=uk​(z) for all z∈Cz\in\mathbb{C}z∈C.

Formalization Note The level is given in the form of exists_transverse_disk_open_book_of_approx and of the goal of the previous mission. The puncture at ∞\infty∞ is IsNondegenerateEnd H u cylInf P 1 (nondegenerate in the sense of Hryniewicz 2014, Definition 2.9); "fast" is IsFastPlane, "embedded" is IsEmbeddedPlane. μCZ(P)≥3\mu_{CZ}(P)\ge3μCZ​(P)≥3 is P.IsCZAtLeast 3, the index of the linearized flow along PPP in the global frame of ξ\xiξ; PPP itself need not be nondegenerate. Hryniewicz writes the hypothesis as μ(u~)≥3\mu(\tilde u)\ge3μ(u~)≥3, where μ(u~)\mu(\tilde u)μ(u~) is the index of PPP in the class of trivializations of ξ\xiξ along PPP that extend over the capping disk uuu. On a strictly star-shaped level ξ\xiξ has a global frame, which extends over every capping disk, so μ(u~)\mu(\tilde u)μ(u~) is determined by PPP and equals the index in that frame. Hryniewicz also requires μ(f(⋅,τ))=μ(u~)\mu(f(\cdot,\tau))=\mu(\tilde u)μ(f(⋅,τ))=μ(u~). On a strictly star-shaped level this index depends only on the asymptotic orbit (see above), and every f(⋅,τ)f(\cdot,\tau)f(⋅,τ) is asymptotic to PPP, so the condition is not restated. The same applies to the condition μ(u~n)=μ\mu(\tilde u_n)=\muμ(u~n​)=μ in Hryniewicz's (3). The parameter τ\tauτ ranges over the open ball Br(0)⊂CB_r(0)\subset\mathbb{C}Br​(0)⊂C, which stands for Hryniewicz's Br(0)⊂R2B_r(0)\subset\mathbb{R}^2Br​(0)⊂R2. "ClC^lCl embedding" is: f:C×C→R4f:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4f:C×C→R4 is ContDiffOn ℝ l, injective, and has injective derivative at every point of C×Br(0)\mathbb{C}\times B_r(0)C×Br​(0). "Proper embedding of C\mathbb{C}C into S∖x(R)S\setminus x(\mathbb{R})S∖x(R)" is stated as: proj∘u\mathrm{proj}\circ uproj∘u is injective, its derivative is injective at every point, and (proj∘u)−1(K)(\mathrm{proj}\circ u)^{-1}(K)(proj∘u)−1(K) is bounded for every compact K⊂R4K\subset\mathbb{R}^4K⊂R4 disjoint from x(R)x(\mathbb{R})x(R).

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Fredholm
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), Theorem 2.3. Let `S = H⁻¹(1) ⊂ ℝ⁴` be strictly star-shaped (in the
coordinates of `HryniewiczCriterion`), `J` a compatible complex structure on `ξ`, and `u` an
embedded fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to the periodic Reeb orbit `P` at `∞`, where the
Conley–Zehnder index of `P` is at least `3` (`P` may be degenerate). Then `proj H ∘ u` does not meet
`x(ℝ)` and is a proper embedding of `ℂ` into `S \ x(ℝ)`. Moreover, for every `l ≥ 1` there are
`r > 0` and a `C^l` embedding `f : ℂ × B_r(0) → V 1` such that
(1) `f(·, 0) = u`;
(2) every `f(·, τ)`, `|τ| < r`, is an embedded fast finite-energy plane asymptotic to `P` at `∞`;
(3) if `τ₀ ∈ B_r(0)` and embedded fast finite-energy planes `uₖ` asymptotic to `P` at `∞`
converge to `f(·, τ₀)` in `C^∞_loc`, then there are `τₖ → τ₀`, `Aₖ → 1` and `Bₖ → 0` with
`f(Aₖ z + Bₖ, τₖ) = uₖ(z)` for all `z` and all large `k`. -/
theorem embedded_fastPlane_fredholm (H₀ : HryniewiczCriterion.R4 → ℝ)
    (hH₀ : HryniewiczCriterion.IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H₀) :
    let H : V 1 → ℝ := fun y => H₀ (fun k => y (Fin.cast (by norm_num) k))
    ∀ J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1, IsCompatibleXiStructure H J → ∀ P : ReebOrbit H,
    P.IsCZAtLeast 3 → ∀ u : ℂ → V 1, IsFastPlane H J u → IsNondegenerateEnd H u cylInf P 1 →
    IsEmbeddedPlane u →
    (∀ z, proj H (u z) ∉ Set.range P.x) ∧ (Function.Injective (proj H ∘ u) ∧
      (∀ z, Function.Injective (fderiv ℝ (proj H ∘ u) z)) ∧
      ∀ K : Set (V 1), IsCompact K → Disjoint K (Set.range P.x) →
        Bornology.IsBounded ((proj H ∘ u) ⁻¹' K)) ∧
    ∀ l : ℕ, 1 ≤ l → ∃ r > 0, ∃ f : ℂ × ℂ → V 1, ContDiffOn ℝ l f (Set.univ ×ˢ ball (0 : ℂ) r) ∧ Set.InjOn f (Set.univ ×ˢ ball (0 : ℂ) r) ∧
      (∀ p ∈ Set.univ ×ˢ ball (0 : ℂ) r, Function.Injective (fderiv ℝ f p)) ∧
      (∀ z, f (z, 0) = u z) ∧
      (∀ τ ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) r, IsFastPlane H J (fun z => f (z, τ)) ∧
        IsNondegenerateEnd H (fun z => f (z, τ)) cylInf P 1 ∧ IsEmbeddedPlane (fun z => f (z, τ))) ∧
      ∀ τ₀ ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) r, ∀ v : ℕ → ℂ → V 1,
        (∀ k, IsFastPlane H J (v k) ∧ IsNondegenerateEnd H (v k) cylInf P 1 ∧
          IsEmbeddedPlane (v k)) →
        JHolomorphic.TendstoCInftyLocOn v (fun z => f (z, τ₀)) Set.univ →
        ∃ τ A B : ℕ → ℂ, Tendsto τ atTop (𝓝 τ₀) ∧ Tendsto A atTop (𝓝 1) ∧
          Tendsto B atTop (𝓝 0) ∧
          ∀ᶠ k in atTop, τ k ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) r ∧ ∀ z, f (A k * z + B k, τ k) = v k z := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Theorem 2.3; H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, E. Zehnder, Properties of pseudoholomorphic curves in symplectizations III: Fredholm theory, in Topics in Nonlinear Analysis, Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 35, Birkhäuser 1999, 381–475, doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8765-6_18, Theorem 1.5
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Read-back: FiniteEnergyPlane.embedded_fastPlane_fredholm

Statement. Let H0:R4→RH_0 : \mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}H0​:R4→R have a strictly star-shaped level (1), and let HHH be the same function regarded on V=R4V = \mathbb{R}^4V=R4 (the indexing set of 4 coordinates is re-identified; concretely H(y)=H0(y)H(y) = H_0(y)H(y)=H0​(y) coordinate by coordinate). For every compatible structure JJJ (2), every Reeb orbit PPP of HHH (4) with Conley–Zehnder index at least 333 (9), and every map u:C→R4u : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 such that

  • uuu is a fast plane for (H,J)(H, J)(H,J) (6),
  • uuu has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to PPP (5),
  • uuu is an embedded plane (7),

the following three assertions hold, where w=π∘uw = \pi \circ uw=π∘u and π\piπ is the radial projection (3):

(A) For all z∈Cz \in \mathbb{C}z∈C: π(u(z))∉{xP(τ):τ∈R}\pi(u(z)) \notin \{x_P(\tau) : \tau \in \mathbb{R}\}π(u(z))∈/{xP​(τ):τ∈R}.

(B) The map w=π∘u:C→R4w = \pi \circ u : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4w=π∘u:C→R4 is injective; for every zzz the real derivative Dw(z):R2→R4Dw(z) : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^4Dw(z):R2→R4 is injective (so www is differentiable at every zzz, since the derivative is 000 by convention at non-differentiability points); and for every compact C⊆R4C \subseteq \mathbb{R}^4C⊆R4 disjoint from {xP(τ)}\{x_P(\tau)\}{xP​(τ)}, the preimage w−1(C)w^{-1}(C)w−1(C) is a bounded subset of C\mathbb{C}C.

(C) For every natural number ℓ≥1\ell \ge 1ℓ≥1 there exist a real r>0r > 0r>0 and a map f:C×C→R4f : \mathbb{C} \times \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4f:C×C→R4, with Dr={τ∈C:∣τ∣<r}D_r = \{\tau \in \mathbb{C} : |\tau| < r\}Dr​={τ∈C:∣τ∣<r} the open complex disc, such that:

  1. fff is real CℓC^\ellCℓ on C×Dr\mathbb{C} \times D_rC×Dr​;
  2. fff is injective on C×Dr\mathbb{C} \times D_rC×Dr​;
  3. at each p∈C×Drp \in \mathbb{C} \times D_rp∈C×Dr​ the real derivative Df(p):R4→R4Df(p) : \mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}^4Df(p):R4→R4 of fff (as a map of C×C≅R4\mathbb{C} \times \mathbb{C} \cong \mathbb{R}^4C×C≅R4) is injective;
  4. f(z,0)=u(z)f(z, 0) = u(z)f(z,0)=u(z) for all z∈Cz \in \mathbb{C}z∈C;
  5. for every τ∈Dr\tau \in D_rτ∈Dr​, the map fτ=f(⋅,τ):C→R4f_\tau = f(\cdot, \tau) : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4fτ​=f(⋅,τ):C→R4 is a fast plane for (H,J)(H, J)(H,J), has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to PPP, and is an embedded plane;
  6. for every τ0∈Dr\tau_0 \in D_rτ0​∈Dr​ and every sequence (vk)k∈N(v_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}}(vk​)k∈N​ of maps C→R4\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4C→R4 such that every vkv_kvk​ is a fast plane for (H,J)(H, J)(H,J), has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to PPP and is an embedded plane, and such that vk→fτ0v_k \to f_{\tau_0}vk​→fτ0​​ in Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ on C\mathbb{C}C (8), there exist sequences (τk)(\tau_k)(τk​), (Ak)(A_k)(Ak​), (Bk)(B_k)(Bk​) of complex numbers with τk→τ0\tau_k \to \tau_0τk​→τ0​, Ak→1A_k \to 1Ak​→1, Bk→0B_k \to 0Bk​→0 such that for all sufficiently large kkk: τk∈Dr\tau_k \in D_rτk​∈Dr​ and
f(Akz+Bk, τk)=vk(z)for all z∈C.f(A_k z + B_k,\ \tau_k) = v_k(z) \quad \text{for all } z \in \mathbb{C}.f(Ak​z+Bk​, τk​)=vk​(z)for all z∈C.

The radius rrr and the map fff may depend on ℓ\ellℓ; the regularity in (C.1) is the finite order ℓ\ellℓ. The only hypothesis stated on PPP is (9): nondegeneracy of PPP, conditions on other Reeb orbits, and primeness of PPP are not hypotheses. "Fast plane" separately contains the existence of some prime Reeb orbit P′P'P′ as asymptotic limit, not stated to be PPP. The conclusion of (C.6) concerns only all sufficiently large kkk.

Notation used throughout. R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 is the space of real 4-tuples x=(x0,x1,x2,x3)x = (x_0, x_1, x_2, x_3)x=(x0​,x1​,x2​,x3​), normed by the sup norm ∥x∥=max⁡i∣xi∣\|x\| = \max_i |x_i|∥x∥=maxi​∣xi​∣. Put

j0(v)=(−v1, v0, −v3, v2),ω0(u,v)=⟨j0u,v⟩=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2,λx(v)=12 ω0(x,v).j_0(v) = (-v_1,\, v_0,\, -v_3,\, v_2), \qquad \omega_0(u, v) = \langle j_0 u, v\rangle = u_0 v_1 - u_1 v_0 + u_2 v_3 - u_3 v_2, \qquad \lambda_x(v) = \tfrac12\, \omega_0(x, v).j0​(v)=(−v1​,v0​,−v3​,v2​),ω0​(u,v)=⟨j0​u,v⟩=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​,λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v).

XH(x)=j0∇H(x)=(−∂1H,∂0H,−∂3H,∂2H)(x)X_H(x) = j_0 \nabla H(x) = (-\partial_1 H, \partial_0 H, -\partial_3 H, \partial_2 H)(x)XH​(x)=j0​∇H(x)=(−∂1​H,∂0​H,−∂3​H,∂2​H)(x), and the Reeb field is R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1XH(x)R(x) = \lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1} X_H(x)R(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x) (with 0−1=00^{-1} = 00−1=0). Let ξx={w:λx(w)=0, dHx(w)=0}\xi_x = \{ w : \lambda_x(w) = 0,\ dH_x(w) = 0\}ξx​={w:λx​(w)=0, dHx​(w)=0}. For ggg on C={s+it}\mathbb{C} = \{s + it\}C={s+it}: ∂sg(z)=Dg(z)⋅1\partial_s g(z) = Dg(z)\cdot 1∂s​g(z)=Dg(z)⋅1, ∂tg(z)=Dg(z)⋅i\partial_t g(z) = Dg(z)\cdot i∂t​g(z)=Dg(z)⋅i, with Dg(z)Dg(z)Dg(z) the real Fréchet derivative, taken to be 000 where ggg is not differentiable.

(1) Strictly star-shaped level. H0H_0H0​ is C∞C^\inftyC∞; for every u≠0u \ne 0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r > 0r>0 with H0(ru)=1H_0(ru) = 1H0​(ru)=1; and d(H0)x(x)>0d(H_0)_x(x) > 0d(H0​)x​(x)>0 whenever H0(x)=1H_0(x) = 1H0​(x)=1.

(2) Compatible structure. JJJ is a C∞C^\inftyC∞ map from R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 to linear maps R4→R4\mathbb{R}^4 \to \mathbb{R}^4R4→R4 such that for every xxx with H(x)=1H(x) = 1H(x)=1 and all v,w∈ξxv, w \in \xi_xv,w∈ξx​: J(x)v∈ξxJ(x)v \in \xi_xJ(x)v∈ξx​, J(x)J(x)v=−vJ(x)J(x)v = -vJ(x)J(x)v=−v, ω0(v,J(x)v)>0\omega_0(v, J(x)v) > 0ω0​(v,J(x)v)>0 if v≠0v \ne 0v=0, and ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J(x)v, J(x)w) = \omega_0(v, w)ω0​(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0​(v,w). Nothing is required off {H=1}\{H = 1\}{H=1} or outside ξx\xi_xξx​.

(3) Radial coordinates. ρ(y)\rho(y)ρ(y) is a chosen r>0r > 0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry) = 1H(ry)=1 if one exists, and 111 otherwise (unique for y≠0y \ne 0y=0 by (1)). π(y)=ρ(y) y\pi(y) = \rho(y)\, yπ(y)=ρ(y)y and a(y)=−12log⁡ρ(y)a(y) = -\tfrac12 \log \rho(y)a(y)=−21​logρ(y). With x=π(y)x = \pi(y)x=π(y), r=ρ(y)r = \rho(y)r=ρ(y), α(w)=r2 dHx(x)dHx(w)\alpha(w) = \frac{r}{2\, dH_x(x)} dH_x(w)α(w)=2dHx​(x)r​dHx​(w), β(w)=rλx(w)\beta(w) = r \lambda_x(w)β(w)=rλx​(w):

J~(y)w=α(w) r−1R(x)−2β(w) y+J(x)(w−2α(w) y−β(w) r−1R(x)).\tilde J(y) w = \alpha(w)\, r^{-1} R(x) - 2\beta(w)\, y + J(x)\big( w - 2\alpha(w)\, y - \beta(w)\, r^{-1} R(x) \big).J~(y)w=α(w)r−1R(x)−2β(w)y+J(x)(w−2α(w)y−β(w)r−1R(x)).

(4) Reeb orbits. A Reeb orbit QQQ is a pair (xQ,TQ)(x_Q, T_Q)(xQ​,TQ​) with xQ:R→R4x_Q : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^4xQ​:R→R4, TQ>0T_Q > 0TQ​>0, and H(xQ(τ))=1H(x_Q(\tau)) = 1H(xQ​(τ))=1, xQ′(τ)=R(xQ(τ))x_Q'(\tau) = R(x_Q(\tau))xQ′​(τ)=R(xQ​(τ)), xQ(τ+TQ)=xQ(τ)x_Q(\tau + T_Q) = x_Q(\tau)xQ​(τ+TQ​)=xQ​(τ) for all τ\tauτ. TQT_QTQ​ need not be the minimal period. QQQ is prime if xQ(τ)≠xQ(0)x_Q(\tau) \ne x_Q(0)xQ​(τ)=xQ​(0) for 0<τ<TQ0 < \tau < T_Q0<τ<TQ​.

(5) Nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to QQQ. With e(s,t)=e2πse2πite(s, t) = e^{2\pi s} e^{2\pi i t}e(s,t)=e2πse2πit, a map g:C→R4g : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4g:C→R4 has this property if there are d,c∈Rd, c \in \mathbb{R}d,c∈R and b>0b > 0b>0 with

sup⁡t∣a(g(e(s,t)))−TQ s−d∣→0,sup⁡tebs∥π(g(e(s,t)))−xQ(TQt+c)∥→0(s→+∞).\sup_{t} \big| a(g(e(s,t))) - T_Q\, s - d \big| \to 0, \qquad \sup_{t} e^{bs} \big\| \pi(g(e(s,t))) - x_Q(T_Q t + c) \big\| \to 0 \qquad (s \to +\infty).tsup​​a(g(e(s,t)))−TQ​s−d​→0,tsup​ebs​π(g(e(s,t)))−xQ​(TQ​t+c)​→0(s→+∞).

The constants d,c,bd, c, bd,c,b may differ between maps ggg (in (C.5) and (C.6) they may differ with τ\tauτ and with kkk).

(6) Fast plane. g:C→R4g : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{R}^4g:C→R4 is a fast plane for (H,J)(H, J)(H,J) if: ggg is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on C\mathbb{C}C, never 000, and J~\tilde JJ~-holomorphic (ggg differentiable and ∂sg+J~(g) ∂tg=0\partial_s g + \tilde J(g)\, \partial_t g = 0∂s​g+J~(g)∂t​g=0 at every zzz); its energy

E(g)=sup⁡φ∫Cmax⁡(0, φ′(a)(∂sa λw(∂tw)−∂ta λw(∂sw))+φ(a) ω0(∂sw,∂tw)) dzE(g) = \sup_{\varphi} \int_{\mathbb{C}} \max\Big(0,\ \varphi'(\mathbf a)\big(\partial_s \mathbf a\, \lambda_w(\partial_t w) - \partial_t \mathbf a\, \lambda_w(\partial_s w)\big) + \varphi(\mathbf a)\, \omega_0(\partial_s w, \partial_t w)\Big)\, dzE(g)=φsup​∫C​max(0, φ′(a)(∂s​aλw​(∂t​w)−∂t​aλw​(∂s​w))+φ(a)ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w))dz

is finite (φ\varphiφ over C∞C^\inftyC∞ nondecreasing R→[0,1]\mathbb{R} \to [0, 1]R→[0,1]; here a=a∘g\mathbf a = a \circ ga=a∘g, w=π∘gw = \pi \circ gw=π∘g); there is some prime Reeb orbit P′P'P′ such that ggg has a nondegenerate end at ∞\infty∞ asymptotic to P′P'P′; and: with Π(z)=ζw(z)(∂sw(z)−λw(z)(∂sw(z))R(w(z)))\Pi(z) = \zeta_{w(z)}\big(\partial_s w(z) - \lambda_{w(z)}(\partial_s w(z)) R(w(z))\big)Π(z)=ζw(z)​(∂s​w(z)−λw(z)​(∂s​w(z))R(w(z))), where ζx(v)=ω0(v,F2(x))+i ω0(F1(x),v)\zeta_x(v) = \omega_0(v, F_2(x)) + i\,\omega_0(F_1(x), v)ζx​(v)=ω0​(v,F2​(x))+iω0​(F1​(x),v), F1(x)=∣x∣−1(Q2x−dHx(Q2x)dHx(x)x)F_1(x) = |x|^{-1}\big(Q_2 x - \frac{dH_x(Q_2x)}{dH_x(x)} x\big)F1​(x)=∣x∣−1(Q2​x−dHx​(x)dHx​(Q2​x)​x), F2(x)=∣x∣−1(Q1x−dHx(Q1x)dHx(x)x)F_2(x) = |x|^{-1}\big(Q_1 x - \frac{dH_x(Q_1x)}{dH_x(x)} x\big)F2​(x)=∣x∣−1(Q1​x−dHx​(x)dHx​(Q1​x)​x), Q1x=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_1 x = (-x_2, x_3, x_0, -x_1)Q1​x=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), Q2x=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_2 x = (x_3, x_2, -x_1, -x_0)Q2​x=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​), ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ Euclidean: the zero set ZZZ of Π\PiΠ is finite and there are integers kzk_zkz​, z∈Zz \in Zz∈Z, with ∑z∈Zkz=0\sum_{z \in Z} k_z = 0∑z∈Z​kz​=0, where each zzz is an isolated zero (nonzero on B‾(z,ϱ)∖{z}\overline B(z, \varrho) \setminus \{z\}B(z,ϱ)∖{z} for some ϱ>0\varrho > 0ϱ>0) and for all ρ∈(0,ϱ)\rho \in (0, \varrho)ρ∈(0,ϱ) the loop t↦Π(z+ρe2πit)t \mapsto \Pi(z + \rho e^{2\pi i t})t↦Π(z+ρe2πit) is continuous, 1-periodic, nowhere zero, with a continuous argument θ\thetaθ satisfying θ(1)−θ(0)=2πkz\theta(1) - \theta(0) = 2\pi k_zθ(1)−θ(0)=2πkz​.

(7) Embedded plane. ggg is injective and Dg(z):R2→R4Dg(z) : \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^4Dg(z):R2→R4 is injective for every zzz (in particular ggg is differentiable everywhere).

(8) Cloc∞C^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}Cloc∞​ convergence on C\mathbb{C}C. For every compact C⊆CC \subseteq \mathbb{C}C⊆C and every m∈Nm \in \mathbb{N}m∈N, the iterated real derivatives Dmvk→Dmfτ0D^m v_k \to D^m f_{\tau_0}Dmvk​→Dmfτ0​​ uniformly on CCC as k→∞k \to \inftyk→∞. (Here Dmfτ0D^m f_{\tau_0}Dmfτ0​​ is the iterated derivative of fτ0f_{\tau_0}fτ0​​ on all of C\mathbb{C}C.)

(9) Conley–Zehnder index at least 333 of PPP. For every Hamiltonian periodic orbit Γ=(y,T)\Gamma = (y, T)Γ=(y,T) of HHH (i.e. T>0T > 0T>0, y′(t)=XH(y(t))y'(t) = X_H(y(t))y′(t)=XH​(y(t)) and H(y(t))=1H(y(t)) = 1H(y(t))=1 for all ttt, y(t+T)=y(t)y(t + T) = y(t)y(t+T)=y(t)) such that {y(t)}={xP(τ)}\{y(t)\} = \{x_P(\tau)\}{y(t)}={xP​(τ)} as sets and

TP=∫0Tλy(τ)(y′(τ)) dτ,T_P = \int_0^{T} \lambda_{y(\tau)}\big(y'(\tau)\big)\, d\tau,TP​=∫0T​λy(τ)​(y′(τ))dτ,

and for every Y:R→L(R4)Y : \mathbb{R} \to L(\mathbb{R}^4)Y:R→L(R4) with Y(0)=idY(0) = \mathrm{id}Y(0)=id and Y′(t)=DXH(y(t)) Y(t)Y'(t) = DX_H(y(t))\, Y(t)Y′(t)=DXH​(y(t))Y(t) for all ttt, one has 3≤CZ(M)3 \le \mathrm{CZ}(M)3≤CZ(M), where M:R→R2×2M : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^{2\times 2}M:R→R2×2 is

M(τ)ij=[ζy(Tτ)R2(Y(Tτ)fj−λy(Tτ)(Y(Tτ)fj)λy(Tτ)(XH(y(Tτ))) XH(y(Tτ)))]i,M(\tau)_{ij} = \Big[\zeta^{\mathbb{R}^2}_{y(T\tau)}\Big( Y(T\tau) f_j - \tfrac{\lambda_{y(T\tau)}(Y(T\tau) f_j)}{\lambda_{y(T\tau)}(X_H(y(T\tau)))}\, X_H(y(T\tau)) \Big)\Big]_i,M(τ)ij​=[ζy(Tτ)R2​(Y(Tτ)fj​−λy(Tτ)​(XH​(y(Tτ)))λy(Tτ)​(Y(Tτ)fj​)​XH​(y(Tτ)))]i​,

f1=F1(y(0))f_1 = F_1(y(0))f1​=F1​(y(0)), f2=F2(y(0))f_2 = F_2(y(0))f2​=F2​(y(0)), ζxR2(v)=(ω0(v,F2(x)), ω0(F1(x),v))\zeta^{\mathbb{R}^2}_x(v) = \big(\omega_0(v, F_2(x)),\ \omega_0(F_1(x), v)\big)ζxR2​(v)=(ω0​(v,F2​(x)), ω0​(F1​(x),v)). The integer CZ(M)\mathrm{CZ}(M)CZ(M): let WWW be the set of numbers (θ(1)−s)/(2π)(\theta(1) - s)/(2\pi)(θ(1)−s)/(2π) over all s∈[0,2π]s \in [0, 2\pi]s∈[0,2π] and all θ:R→R\theta : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}θ:R→R continuous on [0,1][0, 1][0,1] with θ(0)=s\theta(0) = sθ(0)=s and M(t)(cos⁡s,sin⁡s)=rt(cos⁡θ(t),sin⁡θ(t))M(t)(\cos s, \sin s) = r_t (\cos\theta(t), \sin\theta(t))M(t)(coss,sins)=rt​(cosθ(t),sinθ(t)) for some rt>0r_t > 0rt​>0, for each t∈[0,1]t \in [0, 1]t∈[0,1]. Let w‾=inf⁡W\underline w = \inf Ww​=infW, w‾=sup⁡W\overline w = \sup Ww=supW (each 000 by convention if WWW is empty or unbounded on that side). Then CZ(M)=2(⌈w‾⌉−1)\mathrm{CZ}(M) = 2(\lceil \overline w\rceil - 1)CZ(M)=2(⌈w⌉−1) if w‾≤⌈w‾⌉−1\underline w \le \lceil \overline w \rceil - 1w​≤⌈w⌉−1, and CZ(M)=2⌈w‾⌉−1\mathrm{CZ}(M) = 2\lceil \overline w\rceil - 1CZ(M)=2⌈w⌉−1 otherwise. If no such Γ\GammaΓ or YYY exists the condition holds vacuously.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 4, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me