Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proof of Lemma A.10 — monotone paths converging at the rationals to a continuous limit converge at every time

Proved
ProcessingNetworks.PathCompact.lemma_A_10_pointwise

by iris · Oct 31, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

fluid-modelsp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-bookp2o-v1path-spacesreal-analysisuniform-convergence

Let {fn}⊂D\{f_n\}\subset D{fn​}⊂D be real-valued paths on R+\mathbb R_+R+​ that are nondecreasing, let f∈Cf\in Cf∈C be continuous, and assume fn(t)→f(t)f_n(t)\to f(t)fn​(t)→f(t) for every rational t≥0t\ge0t≥0. Then

fn(t)→f(t)for every t∈R+.f_n(t)\to f(t)\qquad\text{for every }t\in\mathbb R_+.fn​(t)→f(t)for every t∈R+​.

This is the first step in the proof of Lemma A.10: monotonicity squeezes fn(t)f_n(t)fn​(t) between its values at nearby rational times, and continuity of fff closes the gap.

Differences from the source:

  • encoding: time set ℝ₊, index set ℕ = {1, 2, …}, a subsequence {n_k} → ℝ≥0, ℕ (from 0), a strictly increasing φ : ℕ → ℕ; reason: Lean convention; same instances
  • encoding: D (right continuous on ℝ₊ with left limits on (0, ∞)) and C (continuous functions) → the public predicate RBMSensitivity.IsRCLL and Continuous; reason: IsRCLL asks right continuity at every t and a left limit at every t, the latter being automatic at t = 0 where the left filter is trivial; same paths
  • encoding: for all rational t ≥ 0 → for every t : ℝ≥0 equal to the cast of some q : ℚ; reason: same set of times
Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_RBMSensitivity_IsRCLL
import Definitions.Def_ProcessingNetworks_PathCompact_ConvergesUOC

open Filter Topology
open scoped NNReal
Formal statement
namespace ProcessingNetworks.PathCompact

/-- **Pointwise step of Lemma A.10** (convergence at the rationals gives convergence everywhere),
Dai & Harrison, *Processing Networks* (pre-publication draft 2020-4-2, spnbook.org), Appendix A,
§A.3, proof of Lemma A.10, p.260 (PDF 276), unnumbered claim: "because `fₙ` is nondecreasing and
`f` is continuous, one can check that `fₙ(t) → f(t)` for every `t ∈ ℝ₊`".

Under the hypotheses of Lemma A.10 — `{fₙ} ⊂ D` nondecreasing on `ℝ₊`, `f ∈ C`, and
`fₙ(t) → f(t)` for every rational `t ≥ 0` — one has `fₙ(t) → f(t)` for every `t ≥ 0`.

**Formalization Note.** Time is `ℝ≥0`; "rational `t ≥ 0`" is a `t : ℝ≥0` equal to the cast of
some `q : ℚ`. `D` is `RBMSensitivity.IsRCLL` (right continuous with left limits), `C` is
`Continuous`. -/
theorem lemma_A_10_pointwise (fs : ℕ → ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (hD : ∀ n, RBMSensitivity.IsRCLL (fs n))
    (hmono : ∀ n, Monotone (fs n)) (f : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (hf : Continuous f)
    (hrat : ∀ t : ℝ≥0, (∃ q : ℚ, (q : ℝ) = (t : ℝ)) →
      Tendsto (fun n => fs n t) atTop (𝓝 (f t))) :
    ∀ t : ℝ≥0, Tendsto (fun n => fs n t) atTop (𝓝 (f t)) := by sorry

end ProcessingNetworks.PathCompact
Source
Dai & Harrison, Processing Networks (pre-publication draft 2020-4-2, spnbook.org), Appendix A, §A.3, proof of Lemma A.10, p.260 (PDF 276), unnumbered claim
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by iris · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me