Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

§4.2 — the manufacturers' ex ante profits πM(0)\pi_M(0)πM​(0), πMU(1)\pi_M^U(1)πMU​(1), πMI(1)\pi_M^I(1)πMI​(1), πM(2)\pi_M(2)πM​(2) (production economy)

Proved
InfoSharing.Economy.ex_ante_profits_manufacturers

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

information-sharingp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1supply-chain

Let ϕ>0\phi > 0ϕ>0 and 0<ce<2/(1+ϕ)0 < c_e < 2/(1+\phi)0<ce​<2/(1+ϕ), put c=−cec = -c_ec=−ce​, and let a,ba, ba,b be reals. Let (θ,Y)(\theta, Y)(θ,Y) satisfy the signal model with variance σ2\sigma^2σ2 and weight β=β(t,σ)\beta = \beta(t,\sigma)β=β(t,σ), and let EEE be any family of pricing equilibria with payoff table MMM. For every profile XXX and manufacturer iii,

M(X,i)={πM(0)n(X)=0,πMU(1)n(X)=1, Xi=U,πMI(1)n(X)=1, Xi=I,πM(2)n(X)=2,M(X, i) = \begin{cases} \pi_M(0) & n(X) = 0, \\ \pi_M^U(1) & n(X) = 1,\ X_i = U, \\ \pi_M^I(1) & n(X) = 1,\ X_i = I, \\ \pi_M(2) & n(X) = 2, \end{cases}M(X,i)=⎩⎨⎧​πM​(0)πMU​(1)πMI​(1)πM​(2)​n(X)=0,n(X)=1, Xi​=U,n(X)=1, Xi​=I,n(X)=2,​

where, with πˉM=(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)(a−b)24(2+ϕ+(1+ϕ)c)2\bar\pi_M = \frac{(1+\phi)(2+(1+\phi)c)(a-b)^2}{4(2+\phi+(1+\phi)c)^2}πˉM​=4(2+ϕ+(1+ϕ)c)2(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)(a−b)2​,

πM(0)=πˉM−cβσ24−c(1−β)σ2,πMU(1)=πˉM−c4[2+3ϕ+(1+ϕ)(1+2ϕ)c(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)]2βσ2−c(1−β)σ2,\pi_M(0) = \bar\pi_M - \frac{c\beta\sigma^2}{4} - c(1-\beta)\sigma^2, \qquad \pi_M^U(1) = \bar\pi_M - \frac{c}{4}\left[\frac{2+3\phi+(1+\phi)(1+2\phi)c}{(1+\phi)(2+(1+\phi)c)}\right]^2\beta\sigma^2 - c(1-\beta)\sigma^2,πM​(0)=πˉM​−4cβσ2​−c(1−β)σ2,πMU​(1)=πˉM​−4c​[(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)2+3ϕ+(1+ϕ)(1+2ϕ)c​]2βσ2−c(1−β)σ2, πMI(1)=πˉM+βσ24(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)−c(1−β)σ2,πM(2)=πˉM+(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)4(2+ϕ+(1+ϕ)c)2βσ2−c(1−β)σ2.\pi_M^I(1) = \bar\pi_M + \frac{\beta\sigma^2}{4(1+\phi)(2+(1+\phi)c)} - c(1-\beta)\sigma^2, \qquad \pi_M(2) = \bar\pi_M + \frac{(1+\phi)(2+(1+\phi)c)}{4(2+\phi+(1+\phi)c)^2}\beta\sigma^2 - c(1-\beta)\sigma^2 .πMI​(1)=πˉM​+4(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)βσ2​−c(1−β)σ2,πM​(2)=πˉM​+4(2+ϕ+(1+ϕ)c)2(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)​βσ2−c(1−β)σ2.

These closed forms are the input of every comparison in Lemma 5 and Propositions 6–8.

Formalization Note The production economy model takes c=−cec = -c_ec=−ce​ with 0<ce<2/(1+ϕ)0 < c_e < 2/(1+\phi)0<ce​<2/(1+ϕ) (the Assumption of p. 251). The ex ante profits are those of an equilibrium of the pricing game on the signal model, not the closed forms: the closed forms are the content of the §4.2 milestones. The production cost is the uncapped quadratic bq−ceq2bq - c_e q^2bq−ce​q2 (the paper's cap at qˉ=b/(2ce)\bar q = b/(2c_e)qˉ​=b/(2ce​) is assumed never to bind, footnote 11, p. 251). Correction of the paper. The single value ce∗=2+3ϕ(1+2ϕ)(1+ϕ)c_e^* = \frac{2+3\phi}{(1+2\phi)(1+\phi)}ce∗​=(1+2ϕ)(1+ϕ)2+3ϕ​ (which lies in (1/(1+ϕ),2/(1+ϕ))(1/(1+\phi), 2/(1+\phi))(1/(1+ϕ),2/(1+ϕ))) is excluded: there the slope ϕ(1+(1+ϕ)c)/[(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)]\phi(1+(1+\phi)c)/[(1+\phi)(2+(1+\phi)c)]ϕ(1+(1+ϕ)c)/[(1+ϕ)(2+(1+ϕ)c)] of the best response (2) equals −1-1−1, so the pricing stage has a continuum of equilibria with different ex ante profits, and Lemma 1's uniqueness claim, on which the payoff table rests, fails.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_InfoSharing_Shared_IsSignalModel
import Definitions.Def_InfoSharing_Shared_PayoffTable
import Definitions.Def_InfoSharing_Shared_ClosedForms
open MeasureTheory
open InfoSharing.Shared
Formal statement
namespace InfoSharing.Economy

/-- **§4.2, manufacturers' ex ante profits** (Shang, Ha & Tong 2016, p. 252), production
economy (`c = −c_e`) under the Assumption `c_e < 2/(1+φ)`. In the payoff table of every family
of pricing equilibria, manufacturer `i`'s ex ante profit is `π_M(0)`, `π_M(2)`, `π_M^I(1)` or
`π_M^U(1)` according to the number of informed manufacturers and his own status.

**Correction.** The value `c_e = (2+3φ)/((1+2φ)(1+φ))` is excluded: there the best-response
slope in (2) is `−1`, the pricing stage has a continuum of equilibria with different ex ante
profits, and Lemma 1's uniqueness (on which the paper's payoff table rests) fails. -/
theorem ex_ante_profits_manufacturers (φ ce c a b σ β : ℝ) {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
    (μ : Measure Ω) (θ Y : Ω → ℝ) (E : (Fin 2 → Status) → PricingProfile)
    (hφ : 0 < φ) (hc : c = -ce) (hce : 0 < ce) (hA : ce < 2 / (1 + φ))
    (hU : ce ≠ (2 + 3 * φ) / ((1 + 2 * φ) * (1 + φ)))
    (hM : IsSignalModel μ θ Y σ β) (hE : IsPricingEqFamily μ θ Y a b c φ β E)
    (X : Fin 2 → Status) (i : Fin 2) :
    (numInformed X = 0 → (payoffTable μ θ Y a b c φ E).M X i = piM0 a b c φ σ β) ∧
    (numInformed X = 1 → X i = Status.uninformed →
      (payoffTable μ θ Y a b c φ E).M X i = piMU1 a b c φ σ β) ∧
    (numInformed X = 1 → X i = Status.informed →
      (payoffTable μ θ Y a b c φ E).M X i = piMI1 a b c φ σ β) ∧
    (numInformed X = 2 → (payoffTable μ θ Y a b c φ E).M X i = piM2 a b c φ σ β) := by sorry

end InfoSharing.Economy
Source
Shang, Ha & Tong, Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer, Management Sci. 62(1) 2016, p. 252, §4.2
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me