Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proof of Theorem 4.6, even case — make-span ∣x2∣|x^2|∣x2∣ against 12∣x2∣+kε\tfrac12|x^2| + k\varepsilon21​∣x2∣+kε

Proved
AlgMechDesign.LowerBound.ratio_step_even

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

mechanism-designp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1scheduling

In the setting of Claim 4.8 (two agents, k≥3k\ge3k≥3 tasks, a truthful direct mechanism (x,p)(x,p)(x,p), t≡1t \equiv 1t≡1 with ∣x1(t)∣≤∣x2(t)∣|x^1(t)|\le|x^2(t)|∣x1(t)∣≤∣x2(t)∣, x=x1(t)x = x^1(t)x=x1(t), 0<ε<10<\varepsilon<10<ε<1 and t^=t(x→1ε, xˉ→11+ε)\hat t = t(x\xrightarrow{1}\varepsilon,\ \bar x\xrightarrow{1}1+\varepsilon)t^=t(x1​ε, xˉ1​1+ε)), assume that ∣x2(t)∣|x^2(t)|∣x2(t)∣ is even. Then the mechanism's make-span at t^\hat tt^ equals ∣x2(t)∣|x^2(t)|∣x2(t)∣, while some allocation yyy does much better:

g(x(t^),t^)=∣x2(t)∣andg(y,t^)≤12 ∣x2(t)∣+k ε.g\big(x(\hat t),\hat t\big) = |x^2(t)| \qquad\text{and}\qquad g(y,\hat t) \le \tfrac12\,|x^2(t)| + k\,\varepsilon .g(x(t^),t^)=∣x2(t)∣andg(y,t^)≤21​∣x2(t)∣+kε.

(The allocation meant is the one giving agent 1, in addition to x1(t)x^1(t)x1(t), half of agent 2's original tasks.) Letting ε→0\varepsilon \to 0ε→0 this gives the ratio 222 in the lower bound.

Formalization Note Agents 1 and 2 are 0 and 1 in Fin 2. The good allocation yyy is existentially quantified. The odd case of the paper's proof is not part of this statement.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_AlgMechDesign_LowerBound_Model
Formal statement
namespace AlgMechDesign.LowerBound

/-- The ratio step of the proof of Theorem 4.6 (even case): in the setting of Claim 4.8, if
`|x²(t)|` is even then at `t̂` the mechanism's make-span is `|x²(t)|`, while some allocation has
make-span at most `|x²(t)|/2 + k·ε`. -/
theorem ratio_step_even {k : ℕ} (hk : 3 ≤ k) (alloc : (Fin 2 → Fin k → ℝ) → (Fin k → Fin 2))
    (pay : (Fin 2 → Fin k → ℝ) → Fin 2 → ℝ) (htruth : IsTruthful alloc pay)
    (t : Fin 2 → Fin k → ℝ) (ht : t = fun _ _ => 1)
    (hcard : (taskSet (alloc t) 0).card ≤ (taskSet (alloc t) 1).card)
    (heven : Even (taskSet (alloc t) 1).card)
    (x : Finset (Fin k)) (hx : x = taskSet (alloc t) 0)
    (ε : ℝ) (hε0 : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1)
    (that : Fin 2 → Fin k → ℝ)
    (hthat : that = Function.update t 0 (fun j => if j ∈ x then ε else 1 + ε)) :
    makespan that (alloc that) = ((taskSet (alloc t) 1).card : ℝ) ∧
      ∃ y : Fin k → Fin 2,
        makespan that y ≤ ((taskSet (alloc t) 1).card : ℝ) / 2 + (k : ℝ) * ε := by sorry

end AlgMechDesign.LowerBound
Source
Nisan, Ronen, Algorithmic Mechanism Design, Games Econ. Behav. 35, 2001, p. 179, proof of Theorem 4.6, paragraph after Claim 4.8
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me