Upper bound (ER Proposition 5.3 with the pigeonhole bound)
ProvedClassicalSchur.erL_leadditive-combinatoricscombinatoricsramsey-theoryschur-degree-block-sumssum-free-sets
This is the upper bound of Proposition 5.3 of Eliahou and Revuelta, with the pigeonhole bound in place of the Ramsey numbers.
Let be the least positive integer such that every sequence of positive integers with and average has block sums of Schur degree . Let and . Then for every ,
The values give , , and . The first two agree with the values and of the paper, and the last is the upper half of the bounds of the mission.
Formalization Note The paper states for ; the Lean statement has for every , and in place of . At it gives , while the known bound with Proposition 5.3 gives . The subtraction is ordinary subtraction because .
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_ClassicalSchurBasic import Definitions.Def_ClassicalSchurRamsey import Mathlib open ClassicalSchur
Formal statement
theorem ClassicalSchur.erL_le (k : ℕ) : erL (k + 1) ≤ ramseyBound k - 1 := by sorry
Source
S. Eliahou and M. P. Revuelta, "The Schur degree of additive sets", Discrete Math. 344(5) (2021) 112332, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2021.112332 (preprint arXiv:2006.01502), Proposition 5.3 (upper bound L(n) ≤ R_{n−1}(3) − 1). A. McKenna, "The Schur degree of block sums: L(4) = 16 and L(5) ≥ 49", Zenodo (2026), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22987189, §2 (Proposition 5.3 as quoted) and §7. Lean source: https://github.com/mysticflounder/schur-degree-block-sums/blob/v1.0.1/lean/ClassicalSchur/Ramsey.lean#L152-L156 (release v1.0.1, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22987688).
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.