Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Gradient blow-up of sequences of fast planes happens at finitely many points of the unit disk

Proved
FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_subseq_gradNorm_bounded_off_finite

by Mazecto · Nov 3, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

compactnessfast-planespseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectization

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ. Let PPP be a periodic Reeb orbit, K⊂R4K\subset\mathbb{R}^4K⊂R4, and γ>0\gamma>0γ>0 smaller than every period at most TPT_PTP​ of a periodic Reeb orbit. Every sequence (uk)(u_k)(uk​) in Θ(K,P)\Theta(K,P)Θ(K,P) has a subsequence (ukj)(u_{k_j})(ukj​​) for which there is a finite set Γ\GammaΓ in the closed unit disk with #Γ⋅γ≤TP\#\Gamma\cdot\gamma\le T_P#Γ⋅γ≤TP​ such that

  1. ∣dukj∣|du_{k_j}|∣dukj​​∣ is uniformly bounded on every compact subset of C∖Γ\mathbb{C}\setminus\GammaC∖Γ;
  2. every z∈Γz\in\Gammaz∈Γ is a limit of points ζj→z\zeta_j\to zζj​→z with ∣dukj(ζj)∣→∞|du_{k_j}(\zeta_j)|\to\infty∣dukj​​(ζj​)∣→∞.

Formalization Note Θ(K,P)\Theta(K,P)Θ(K,P) is fastPlaneSet H J P K γ; ∣du∣|du|∣du∣ is gradNorm H u, the sum of the norms of the derivatives of the coordinates aaa and proj∘u\mathrm{proj}\circ uproj∘u.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Compactness
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Hryniewicz (Trans. AMS 2012), Corollaries 4.8–4.10. Let `P` be a periodic Reeb orbit on
`S ⊂ ℝ⁴` and `0 < γ` smaller than every period at most `P.T`. Every sequence in
`fastPlaneSet H J P K γ` has a subsequence and a finite set `Γ` of points of the closed unit disk,
with `#Γ · γ ≤ P.T`, such that the gradients `gradNorm H uₖ` are uniformly bounded on every compact
subset of `ℂ \ Γ` and every point of `Γ` is a limit of points where the gradients tend to `∞`. -/
theorem exists_subseq_gradNorm_bounded_off_finite (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
    (P : ReebOrbit H) (K : Set (V 1)) (γ : ℝ) (hγ : 0 < γ)
    (hγ₁ : ∀ Q : ReebOrbit H, Q.T ≤ P.T → γ < Q.T)
    (u : ℕ → ℂ → V 1) (hu : ∀ k, u k ∈ fastPlaneSet H J P K γ) :
    ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∃ Γ : Finset ℂ, (∀ z ∈ Γ, ‖z‖ ≤ 1) ∧ (Γ.card : ℝ) * γ ≤ P.T ∧
      (∀ Kc : Set ℂ, Kc ⊆ (↑Γ)ᶜ → IsCompact Kc →
        ∃ M : ℝ, ∀ k, ∀ z ∈ Kc, gradNorm H (u (φ k)) z ≤ M) ∧
      ∀ z ∈ Γ, ∃ ζ : ℕ → ℂ, Tendsto ζ atTop (𝓝 z) ∧
        Tendsto (fun k => gradNorm H (u (φ k)) (ζ k)) atTop atTop := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Corollaries 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Read-back: FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_subseq_gradNorm_bounded_off_finite

We work in R4\mathbb{R}^4R4, with coordinates 0,1,2,30,1,2,30,1,2,3 and the maximum norm. The theorem takes the following data and hypotheses.

  • H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R has a strictly star-shaped level.
  • J:R4→L(R4)J:\mathbb{R}^4\to L(\mathbb{R}^4)J:R4→L(R4) is a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure.
  • PPP is a Reeb orbit of HHH.
  • K⊆R4K\subseteq\mathbb{R}^4K⊆R4 is an arbitrary set; it need not be bounded or compact.
  • γ>0\gamma>0γ>0 is a real number such that every Reeb orbit QQQ with TQ≤TPT_Q\le T_PTQ​≤TP​ satisfies γ<TQ\gamma<T_Qγ<TQ​. In particular this applies to Q=PQ=PQ=P.
  • (uk)k∈N(u_k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}}(uk​)k∈N​ is a sequence with every uk∈F(H,J,P,K,γ)u_k\in\mathcal{F}(H,J,P,K,\gamma)uk​∈F(H,J,P,K,γ).

If F(H,J,P,K,γ)\mathcal{F}(H,J,P,K,\gamma)F(H,J,P,K,γ) is empty, no such sequence exists and the statement is vacuous.

Conclusion. There exist a strictly increasing φ:N→N\varphi:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}φ:N→N and a finite set Γ⊂C\Gamma\subset\mathbb{C}Γ⊂C with the following properties.

  1. ∣z∣≤1|z|\le1∣z∣≤1 for every z∈Γz\in\Gammaz∈Γ.
  2. #Γ⋅γ≤TP\#\Gamma\cdot\gamma\le T_P#Γ⋅γ≤TP​.
  3. For every compact Kc⊆C∖ΓK_c\subseteq\mathbb{C}\setminus\GammaKc​⊆C∖Γ there is M∈RM\in\mathbb{R}M∈R with
∣∇uφ(k)∣(z)≤Mfor all k∈N and all z∈Kc.|\nabla u_{\varphi(k)}|(z)\le M\quad\text{for all }k\in\mathbb{N}\text{ and all }z\in K_c.∣∇uφ(k)​∣(z)≤Mfor all k∈N and all z∈Kc​.
  1. For every z∈Γz\in\Gammaz∈Γ there is a sequence ζk→z\zeta_k\to zζk​→z in C\mathbb{C}C with ∣∇uφ(k)∣(ζk)→+∞|\nabla u_{\varphi(k)}|(\zeta_k)\to+\infty∣∇uφ(k)​∣(ζk​)→+∞.

The gradient size used in 3 and 4 is

∣∇u∣(z)=∥D(a∘u)(z)∥+∥D(proj∘u)(z)∥,|\nabla u|(z)=\big\|D(a\circ u)(z)\big\|+\big\|D(\mathrm{proj}\circ u)(z)\big\|,∣∇u∣(z)=​D(a∘u)(z)​+​D(proj∘u)(z)​,

a sum of operator norms of Fréchet derivatives (each 000 where the map is not differentiable), computed with the modulus on C\mathbb{C}C and the maximum norm on R4\mathbb{R}^4R4. Γ=∅\Gamma=\varnothingΓ=∅ is allowed.

Definitions used

Forms.

  • j0(v)=(−v1,v0,−v3,v2)j_0(v)=(-v_1,v_0,-v_3,v_2)j0​(v)=(−v1​,v0​,−v3​,v2​).
  • ω0(u,v)=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2\omega_0(u,v)=u_0v_1-u_1v_0+u_2v_3-u_3v_2ω0​(u,v)=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​.
  • λx(v)=12ω0(x,v)\lambda_x(v)=\tfrac12\omega_0(x,v)λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v).
  • XH=j0∇HX_H=j_0\nabla HXH​=j0​∇H, with ∇H(x)k=DH(x)ek\nabla H(x)_k=DH(x)e_k∇H(x)k​=DH(x)ek​.
  • RH(x)=λx(XH(x))−1XH(x)R_H(x)=\lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1}X_H(x)RH​(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x), with 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0.
  • ξx={v:λx(v)=0, DH(x)v=0}\xi_x=\{v:\lambda_x(v)=0,\ DH(x)v=0\}ξx​={v:λx​(v)=0, DH(x)v=0}.

Strictly star-shaped level. HHH is C∞C^\inftyC∞; every u≠0u\ne0u=0 has a unique r>0r>0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru)=1H(ru)=1; and DH(x)x>0DH(x)x>0DH(x)x>0 on {H=1}\{H=1\}{H=1}.

Compatible ξ\xiξ-structure. JJJ is C∞C^\inftyC∞, and for H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1 and v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​:

  • J(x)v∈ξxJ(x)v\in\xi_xJ(x)v∈ξx​;
  • J(x)2v=−vJ(x)^2v=-vJ(x)2v=−v;
  • ω0(v,J(x)v)>0\omega_0(v,J(x)v)>0ω0​(v,J(x)v)>0 for v≠0v\ne0v=0;
  • ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=\omega_0(v,w)ω0​(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0​(v,w).

Reeb orbit. Q=(xQ,TQ)Q=(x_Q,T_Q)Q=(xQ​,TQ​) with TQ>0T_Q>0TQ​>0, H(xQ)=1H(x_Q)=1H(xQ​)=1, xQ′=RH(xQ)x_Q'=R_H(x_Q)xQ′​=RH​(xQ​), and xQ(τ+TQ)=xQ(τ)x_Q(\tau+T_Q)=x_Q(\tau)xQ​(τ+TQ​)=xQ​(τ). The period TQT_QTQ​ is not necessarily minimal. QQQ is prime if xQ(τ)≠xQ(0)x_Q(\tau)\ne x_Q(0)xQ​(τ)=xQ​(0) for 0<τ<TQ0<\tau<T_Q0<τ<TQ​.

Radial coordinates. r(y)r(y)r(y) is a chosen r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if one exists, and r(y)=1r(y)=1r(y)=1 otherwise. Then proj(y)=r(y)y\mathrm{proj}(y)=r(y)yproj(y)=r(y)y and a(y)=−12log⁡r(y)a(y)=-\tfrac12\log r(y)a(y)=−21​logr(y).

J~\tilde JJ~. With x=proj(y)x=\mathrm{proj}(y)x=proj(y), r=r(y)r=r(y)r=r(y), α(v)=r2DH(x)xDH(x)v\alpha(v)=\frac{r}{2DH(x)x}DH(x)vα(v)=2DH(x)xr​DH(x)v and β(v)=rλx(v)\beta(v)=r\lambda_x(v)β(v)=rλx​(v):

J~(y)v=α(v)r−1RH(x)−2β(v)y+J(x)(v−2α(v)y−β(v)r−1RH(x)).\tilde J(y)v=\alpha(v)r^{-1}R_H(x)-2\beta(v)y+J(x)\big(v-2\alpha(v)y-\beta(v)r^{-1}R_H(x)\big).J~(y)v=α(v)r−1RH​(x)−2β(v)y+J(x)(v−2α(v)y−β(v)r−1RH​(x)).

Energies. Write au=a∘ua_u=a\circ uau​=a∘u and wu=proj∘uw_u=\mathrm{proj}\circ uwu​=proj∘u, with ∂sf=Df(z)1\partial_s f=Df(z)1∂s​f=Df(z)1 and ∂tf=Df(z)i\partial_t f=Df(z)i∂t​f=Df(z)i.

  • Edλ(U,u)=∫Umax⁡(ω0(∂swu,∂twu),0) dzE_{d\lambda}(U,u)=\int_U\max(\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u),0)\,dzEdλ​(U,u)=∫U​max(ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​),0)dz.
  • E(U,u)E(U,u)E(U,u) is the supremum, over C∞C^\inftyC∞ nondecreasing ϕ:R→[0,1]\phi:\mathbb{R}\to[0,1]ϕ:R→[0,1], of
∫Umax⁡(ϕ′(au)(∂sauλwu(∂twu)−∂tauλwu(∂swu))+ϕ(au)ω0(∂swu,∂twu),0) dz.\int_U\max\big(\phi'(a_u)(\partial_sa_u\lambda_{w_u}(\partial_tw_u)-\partial_ta_u\lambda_{w_u}(\partial_sw_u))+\phi(a_u)\omega_0(\partial_sw_u,\partial_tw_u),0\big)\,dz.∫U​max(ϕ′(au​)(∂s​au​λwu​​(∂t​wu​)−∂t​au​λwu​​(∂s​wu​))+ϕ(au​)ω0​(∂s​wu​,∂t​wu​),0)dz.

Finite-energy curve on UUU. This means all of the following:

  • uuu is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on UUU and nonvanishing there;
  • uuu is differentiable with ∂su+J~(u)∂tu=0\partial_su+\tilde J(u)\partial_tu=0∂s​u+J~(u)∂t​u=0 at each z∈Uz\in Uz∈U;
  • E(U,u)<∞E(U,u)<\inftyE(U,u)<∞.

Exponential end at ∞\infty∞. NdEnd∞(u,P)\mathrm{NdEnd}_\infty(u,P)NdEnd∞​(u,P) means there are d,c∈Rd,c\in\mathbb{R}d,c∈R and b>0b>0b>0 with, as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞ and uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R,

a(u(e2πse2πit))−TPs−d→0,ebs(proj(u(e2πse2πit))−xP(TPt+c))→0.a(u(e^{2\pi s}e^{2\pi it}))-T_Ps-d\to0,\qquad e^{bs}\big(\mathrm{proj}(u(e^{2\pi s}e^{2\pi it}))-x_P(T_Pt+c)\big)\to0.a(u(e2πse2πit))−TP​s−d→0,ebs(proj(u(e2πse2πit))−xP​(TP​t+c))→0.

Winding number. A loop f:R→Cf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}f:R→C has winding number kkk if all of the following hold:

  • fff is continuous, 111-periodic and nowhere zero;
  • some continuous θ\thetaθ has f=∣f∣eiθf=|f|e^{i\theta}f=∣f∣eiθ;
  • θ(1)−θ(0)=2πk\theta(1)-\theta(0)=2\pi kθ(1)−θ(0)=2πk.

ξ\xiξ-coordinates. ξC(x,v)=ω0(v,e2(x))+i ω0(e1(x),v)\xi_{\mathbb{C}}(x,v)=\omega_0(v,e_2(x))+i\,\omega_0(e_1(x),v)ξC​(x,v)=ω0​(v,e2​(x))+iω0​(e1​(x),v), where

e1(x)=∣x∣2−1(q2(x)−DH(x)q2(x)DH(x)xx),e2(x)=∣x∣2−1(q1(x)−DH(x)q1(x)DH(x)xx).e_1(x)=|x|_2^{-1}\Big(q_2(x)-\tfrac{DH(x)q_2(x)}{DH(x)x}x\Big),\qquad e_2(x)=|x|_2^{-1}\Big(q_1(x)-\tfrac{DH(x)q_1(x)}{DH(x)x}x\Big).e1​(x)=∣x∣2−1​(q2​(x)−DH(x)xDH(x)q2​(x)​x),e2​(x)=∣x∣2−1​(q1​(x)−DH(x)xDH(x)q1​(x)​x).

Here q1(x)=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)q_1(x)=(-x_2,x_3,x_0,-x_1)q1​(x)=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), q2(x)=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)q_2(x)=(x_3,x_2,-x_1,-x_0)q2​(x)=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​), and ∣⋅∣2|\cdot|_2∣⋅∣2​ is the Euclidean norm.

Fast plane. uuu is a fast plane if all three of the following hold:

  • uuu is a finite-energy curve on all of C\mathbb{C}C;
  • NdEnd∞(u,P′)\mathrm{NdEnd}_\infty(u,P')NdEnd∞​(u,P′) holds for some prime Reeb orbit P′P'P′;
  • the zero set ZZZ of π∂s(z)=ξC(wu(z),∂swu(z)−λwu(z)(∂swu(z))RH(wu(z)))\pi\partial_s(z)=\xi_{\mathbb{C}}\big(w_u(z),\partial_sw_u(z)-\lambda_{w_u(z)}(\partial_sw_u(z))R_H(w_u(z))\big)π∂s​(z)=ξC​(wu​(z),∂s​wu​(z)−λwu​(z)​(∂s​wu​(z))RH​(wu​(z))) is finite, with local indices summing to 000.

A local index of z∈Zz\in Zz∈Z is an integer kkk such that, for some r>0r>0r>0, π∂s\pi\partial_sπ∂s​ has no other zero in Bˉ(z,r)\bar B(z,r)Bˉ(z,r) and t↦π∂s(z+ρe2πit)t\mapsto\pi\partial_s(z+\rho e^{2\pi it})t↦π∂s​(z+ρe2πit) has winding number kkk for all ρ∈(0,r)\rho\in(0,r)ρ∈(0,r).

The set F(H,J,P,K,γ)\mathcal{F}(H,J,P,K,\gamma)F(H,J,P,K,γ). It consists of the fast planes uuu that also satisfy:

  • NdEnd∞(u,P)\mathrm{NdEnd}_\infty(u,P)NdEnd∞​(u,P) for the given PPP;
  • u(0)∈Ku(0)\in Ku(0)∈K;
  • Edλ({∣z∣>1},u)=γE_{d\lambda}(\{|z|>1\},u)=\gammaEdλ​({∣z∣>1},u)=γ.
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 3, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 3, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me