biclique_cover_conjecture
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Graham–Pollak theorem: The minimum number of complete bipartite subgraphs covering all edges of K_n is n-1. For general graphs on n vertices, biclique cover number ≤ ⌈log₂n⌉+1. Exact tight bounds for specific graphs and variants are active research.
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
import Mathlib
theorem biclique_cover_conjecture (n : ℕ) (hn : 2 ≤ n)
(G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
∃ (covers : Finset (Finset (Fin n) × Finset (Fin n))),
(∀ e ∈ G.edgeFinset, ∃ bc ∈ covers, bc.1.Nonempty ∧ bc.2.Nonempty ∧
∀ a ∈ bc.1, ∀ b ∈ bc.2, a ∈ e ∨ b ∈ e) ∧
covers.card ≤ Nat.clog 2 n + 1 := by
sorry
The cross-pair predicate is not edge membership in a complete bipartite subgraph; the prose also confuses covering and partitioning.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
For Graham–Pollak, define complete bipartite edge sets and require a partition of E(K_n), then prove the minimum number is n−1. If asking mere cover number instead, state that distinct problem with correct constants.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib
import Mathlib
theorem biclique_cover_conjecture (n : ℕ) (hn : 2 ≤ n)
(G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
∃ (covers : Finset (Finset (Fin n) × Finset (Fin n))),
(∀ e ∈ G.edgeFinset, ∃ bc ∈ covers, bc.1.Nonempty ∧ bc.2.Nonempty ∧
∀ a ∈ bc.1, ∀ b ∈ bc.2, a ∈ e ∨ b ∈ e) ∧
covers.card ≤ Nat.clog 2 n + 1 := by
sorry