Analytic upper bound for the first non-zero derivative of Gelfond's auxiliary function
ProvedGelfondSchneider.deriv_upperdiaz-modulus-leangelfond-schneidernumber-theorytranscendence
Let , and . There is such that the following holds. Let , , and . Let with , and suppose all derivatives of order below vanish at . Then
The proof applies the grid estimate Transcendence.expPoly_grid_estimate to on the one-dimensional grid , with vanishing order , at the point and with . The zeros at all of , including itself, give the factor , and turns it into up to a factor .
Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
open NumberField
namespace GelfondSchneider
theorem deriv_upper (l β : ℂ) (m : ℕ) (hm : 0 < m) (C₀ : ℝ) (hC₀ : 1 ≤ C₀) :
∃ C : ℝ, 1 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (n q r l₀ : ℕ) (c : Fin q → Fin q → ℂ),
0 < n → q ^ 2 = 2 * m * n → n ≤ r → 1 ≤ l₀ → l₀ ≤ m →
(∀ a b, ‖c a b‖ ≤ C₀ ^ n * (n : ℝ) ^ (((n : ℝ) + 1) / 2)) →
(∀ j : ℕ, 1 ≤ j → j ≤ m → ∀ k < r, iteratedDeriv k (fun z : ℂ => ∑ a : Fin q, ∑ b : Fin q,
c a b * Complex.exp ((((a : ℕ) + 1 : ℂ) + ((b : ℕ) + 1 : ℂ) * β) * l * z)) (j : ℂ) = 0) →
‖iteratedDeriv r (fun z : ℂ => ∑ a : Fin q, ∑ b : Fin q,
c a b * Complex.exp ((((a : ℕ) + 1 : ℂ) + ((b : ℕ) + 1 : ℂ) * β) * l * z)) (l₀ : ℂ)‖ ≤
C ^ r * (r : ℝ) ^ ((r : ℝ) * (3 - m) / 2 + 3 / 2) := by
sorry
end GelfondSchneider
Source
Known: A. O. Gelfond (1934), T. Schneider (1934); this step of Gelfond's proof. Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 24 September 2026 (C. Perassi), restructuring the formalization by M. Karatarakis and F. Wiedijk, A formalization of the Gelfond-Schneider theorem, arXiv:2603.24823 (2026), mathlib4 fork at commit cb781672 (Apache 2.0).