Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Analytic upper bound for the first non-zero derivative of Gelfond's auxiliary function

Proved
GelfondSchneider.deriv_upper

by carlok · Sep 24, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

diaz-modulus-leangelfond-schneidernumber-theorytranscendence

Let l,β∈Cl, \beta \in \mathbb Cl,β∈C, m≥1m \ge 1m≥1 and C0≥1C_0 \ge 1C0​≥1. There is C≥1C \ge 1C≥1 such that the following holds. Let n≥1n \ge 1n≥1, q2=2mnq^2 = 2mnq2=2mn, n≤rn \le rn≤r and 1≤l0≤m1 \le l_0 \le m1≤l0​≤m. Let E(z)=∑a,bcab e(a+bβ)lzE(z) = \sum_{a,b} c_{ab}\, e^{(a + b\beta) l z}E(z)=∑a,b​cab​e(a+bβ)lz with ∣cab∣≤C0nn(n+1)/2|c_{ab}| \le C_0^{n} n^{(n+1)/2}∣cab​∣≤C0n​n(n+1)/2, and suppose all derivatives of order below rrr vanish at 1,…,m1, \dots, m1,…,m. Then

∣E(r)(l0)∣≤Cr r r(3−m)/2+3/2.|E^{(r)}(l_0)| \le C^{r}\, r^{\,r(3-m)/2 + 3/2}.∣E(r)(l0​)∣≤Crrr(3−m)/2+3/2.

The proof applies the grid estimate Transcendence.expPoly_grid_estimate to F(z)=E(z+1)F(z) = E(z + 1)F(z)=E(z+1) on the one-dimensional grid {0,…,m−1}\{0, \dots, m - 1\}{0,…,m−1}, with vanishing order rrr, at the point l0−1l_0 - 1l0​−1 and with u=2+r/qu = 2 + r/qu=2+r/q. The zeros at all of 1,…,m1, \dots, m1,…,m, including l0l_0l0​ itself, give the factor (u−1)−mr(u - 1)^{-mr}(u−1)−mr, and 1/(u−1)≤q/r≤2m r−1/21/(u - 1) \le q/r \le \sqrt{2m}\, r^{-1/2}1/(u−1)≤q/r≤2m​r−1/2 turns it into r−rm/2r^{-rm/2}r−rm/2 up to a factor CrC^{r}Cr.

Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
open NumberField

namespace GelfondSchneider

theorem deriv_upper (l β : ℂ) (m : ℕ) (hm : 0 < m) (C₀ : ℝ) (hC₀ : 1 ≤ C₀) :
    ∃ C : ℝ, 1 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (n q r l₀ : ℕ) (c : Fin q → Fin q → ℂ),
      0 < n → q ^ 2 = 2 * m * n → n ≤ r → 1 ≤ l₀ → l₀ ≤ m →
      (∀ a b, ‖c a b‖ ≤ C₀ ^ n * (n : ℝ) ^ (((n : ℝ) + 1) / 2)) →
      (∀ j : ℕ, 1 ≤ j → j ≤ m → ∀ k < r, iteratedDeriv k (fun z : ℂ => ∑ a : Fin q, ∑ b : Fin q,
          c a b * Complex.exp ((((a : ℕ) + 1 : ℂ) + ((b : ℕ) + 1 : ℂ) * β) * l * z)) (j : ℂ) = 0) →
      ‖iteratedDeriv r (fun z : ℂ => ∑ a : Fin q, ∑ b : Fin q,
          c a b * Complex.exp ((((a : ℕ) + 1 : ℂ) + ((b : ℕ) + 1 : ℂ) * β) * l * z)) (l₀ : ℂ)‖ ≤
        C ^ r * (r : ℝ) ^ ((r : ℝ) * (3 - m) / 2 + 3 / 2) := by
  sorry

end GelfondSchneider
Source
Known: A. O. Gelfond (1934), T. Schneider (1934); this step of Gelfond's proof. Formal proof: Diaz modulus mission, 24 September 2026 (C. Perassi), restructuring the formalization by M. Karatarakis and F. Wiedijk, A formalization of the Gelfond-Schneider theorem, arXiv:2603.24823 (2026), mathlib4 fork at commit cb781672 (Apache 2.0).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me