Characteristic-function error from a discarded finite selection
ProvedMarkovChainCLT.charFun_sub_le_of_small_selectioncentral-limit-theoremmixing-processesprobability
Let be a measurable, centered, strictly stationary real sequence on a probability space with measure . Assume and absolutely summable positive-lag autocovariances. Set
Let be a finite selection of indices, , and let be measurable real random variables satisfying, pointwise,
Writing , for every real ,
This quantifies the effect of deleting a small selection of samples. In particular, if , the characteristic-function error vanishes. The selected indices may have gaps and need not belong to the first indices.
Formalization Note Characteristic functions are those of the pushforward laws under . At , real division and inverse square root use Lean's zero-inverse convention; the hypothesis then says , and the bound is zero.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_MixingCoefficients import Mathlib open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Filter MarkovChainCLT open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology ProbabilityTheory
Formal statement
theorem MarkovChainCLT.charFun_sub_le_of_small_selection {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
(P : Measure Ω) [IsProbabilityMeasure P] (Y : ℕ → Ω → ℝ)
(hY : ∀ n, Measurable (Y n)) (hstat : IsStrictlyStationary P Y)
(hcent : ∫ ω, Y 0 ω ∂P = 0) (hL2 : MemLp (Y 0) 2 P)
(hsum : Summable (fun k : ℕ => |∫ ω, Y 0 ω * Y (k+1) ω ∂P|))
(n : ℕ) (s : Finset ℕ) (F G : Ω → ℝ)
(hF : Measurable F) (hG : Measurable G)
(hsub : ∀ ω, F ω - G ω = (Real.sqrt n)⁻¹ * ∑ i ∈ s, Y i ω)
(t : ℝ) :
‖charFun (P.map F) t - charFun (P.map G) t‖ ≤ |t| * Real.sqrt
(((s.card : ℝ) / n) * ((∫ ω, (Y 0 ω)^2 ∂P) +
2 * ∑' k : ℕ, |∫ ω, Y 0 ω * Y (k+1) ω ∂P|)) := by sorrySource
Auxiliary quantitative finite-selection version of the small-block step. Patrick Billingsley, Probability and Measure, 3rd ed., Section 27, pp. 364-367, especially the proof of Theorem 27.4 on p. 367 (discarded blocks and characteristic-function comparison), https://www.colorado.edu/amath/sites/default/files/attached-files/billingsley.pdf. The displayed constant is derived here from the finite-selection variance bound and the elementary exponential Lipschitz inequality; it is not a verbatim theorem from the book.