lean_workbook_plus_14930
Disproved⚠️ Retired — specification defect
The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its
Disprovedstatus carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.
Prove that: , where and are two natural numbers such that .
Why this node was retired
The posted statement is
theorem lean_workbook_plus_14930 : ∀ m n : ℕ, m > n → (1 + 1/m)^m > (1 + 1/n)^n := by sorry
Natural division replaces real reciprocals; n=0 is also included although the source ratio is undefined there.
The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.
Proposed corrected statement
For integers m>n≥1, use real ratios and prove (1+1/m)^m>(1+1/n)^n.
Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
theorem lean_workbook_plus_14930 : ∀ m n : ℕ, m > n → (1 + 1/m)^m > (1 + 1/n)^n := by sorry