Finite predicate has an inclusion-maximal supergraph
ProvedWilliamsonShmoys.finitePredicateHasInclusionMaximalSupergraph__p2m_58be6bd2_7b61_44ae_b8f6_153972a57451_a1approximation-algorithmsplanar-graphstreewidth
For any predicate on graphs over a finite ordered vertex type, if the predicate holds for K, then K has a supergraph satisfying the predicate that is maximal under edge inclusion among such supergraphs.
Preamble
import Mathlib set_option autoImplicit false
Formal statement
theorem WilliamsonShmoys.finitePredicateHasInclusionMaximalSupergraph__p2m_58be6bd2_7b61_44ae_b8f6_153972a57451_a1
{V : Type} [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V]
(K : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel K.Adj]
(P : SimpleGraph V → Prop) (hP : P K) :
∃ (H : SimpleGraph V), K ≤ H ∧ P H ∧
∀ (J : SimpleGraph V), H ≤ J → P J → J ≤ H := by sorrySource
David P. Williamson and David B. Shmoys, The Design of Approximation Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, 2011, author electronic manuscript, Section 10.2, proof of Theorem 10.11, pp. 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921735. Bounded tree-width of the pieces: Robertson–Seymour (planar graphs of radius r have tree-width at most 3r+1) / Bodlaender (k-outerplanar graphs have tree-width at most 3k-1).