Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

(∗) is equivalent to the LP (IRC[ϵ,δ\epsilon,\deltaϵ,δ])

Proved
RobustLP.Counterpart.star_iff_exists_irc

by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

linear-programmingp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1robust-optimization

Let an uncertain linear program with uncertain-entry sets JiJ_iJi​ be given, and let ϵ>0\epsilon>0ϵ>0, δ>0\delta>0δ>0. A vector xxx is feasible for problem (∗),

Ex=e,Ax≤b,∑jaijxj+ϵ∑j∈Ji∣aij∣∣xj∣≤bi+δmax⁡[1,∣bi∣] ∀i,ℓ≤x≤u,Ex=e,\quad Ax\le b,\quad \sum_j a_{ij}x_j+\epsilon\sum_{j\in J_i}|a_{ij}||x_j|\le b_i+\delta\max[1,|b_i|]\ \forall i,\quad \ell\le x\le u,Ex=e,Ax≤b,j∑​aij​xj​+ϵj∈Ji​∑​∣aij​∣∣xj​∣≤bi​+δmax[1,∣bi​∣] ∀i,ℓ≤x≤u,

if and only if there is y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^ny∈Rn such that (x,y)(x,y)(x,y) is feasible for the interval robust counterpart

Ex=e,Ax≤b,∑jaijxj+ϵ∑j∈Ji∣aij∣ yj≤bi+δmax⁡[1,∣bi∣] ∀i,−yj≤xj≤yj ∀j,ℓ≤x≤u.(IRC[ϵ,δ])Ex=e,\quad Ax\le b,\quad \sum_j a_{ij}x_j+\epsilon\sum_{j\in J_i}|a_{ij}|\,y_j\le b_i+\delta\max[1,|b_i|]\ \forall i,\quad -y_j\le x_j\le y_j\ \forall j,\quad \ell\le x\le u. \tag{IRC[$\epsilon,\delta$]}Ex=e,Ax≤b,j∑​aij​xj​+ϵj∈Ji​∑​∣aij​∣yj​≤bi​+δmax[1,∣bi​∣] ∀i,−yj​≤xj​≤yj​ ∀j,ℓ≤x≤u.(IRC[ϵ,δ])

Since both problems minimize cTxc^TxcTx, they are equivalent optimization problems.

Together with the characterization of reliable solutions by (∗), this shows that a robust optimal solution can be computed by solving a single linear program (Soyster's scheme).

Formalization Note "Equivalent" is formalized as equality of the projections of the feasible sets onto xxx. The misprint aijxia_{ij}x_iaij​xi​ of the printed (IRC) is corrected to aijxja_{ij}x_jaij​xj​.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_RobustLP_Counterpart_UncertainLP
import Definitions.Def_RobustLP_Counterpart_RobustCounterparts
Formal statement
namespace RobustLP.Counterpart

/-- **(∗) is equivalent to (IRC[ε, δ])** (Ben-Tal–Nemirovski 2000, §3.1, pp. 417–418). For `ε > 0`
and `δ > 0`, `x` is feasible for (∗) if and only if there is `y` with `(x, y)` feasible for the
interval robust counterpart (IRC[ε, δ]). (Both problems minimize the same objective `cᵀx`.) -/
theorem star_iff_exists_irc {n p m : ℕ} (L : UncertainLP n p m)
    (ε δ : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) (hδ : 0 < δ) (x : Fin n → ℝ) :
    L.StarFeasible ε δ x ↔ ∃ y : Fin n → ℝ, L.IRCFeasible ε δ x y := by sorry

end RobustLP.Counterpart
Source
Ben-Tal and Nemirovski, Robust solutions of Linear Programming problems contaminated with uncertain data, Math. Program. Ser. A 88 (2000) 411–424, pp. 417–418, §3.1, 'It is easily seen that (∗) is equivalent to the Linear Programming program … (IRC[ϵ, δ])'
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Sep 27, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me