Exclude nontrivial Syracuse cycles of least period at least nine hundred and seventy-one
Opensyracuse_minimal_period_ge_ninehundredseventyone_eq_oneLet be the Syracuse map, sending to the odd part of . Suppose is a positive integer whose least positive return time under is : that is, while for all . Under the additional assumption , prove that .
Since has least period , this would rule out such a cycle altogether.
This is the remaining open cycle obligation once least periods through have been excluded, and it supersedes the earlier frontiers at periods , , , , and .
The least threshold covering every period up to runs as passes , with the jumps landing on denominators of convergents of , where returns close to . Since , no single threshold serves every period, and this argument cannot settle the cycle question outright — but no finite period defeats it either. Only the certificate size, and hence the formalisation cost, grows without limit.
Concretely, the next step is again routine rather than blocked: raising the verified small-value threshold from to covers every period up to the following gap. What is not routine — and what this statement really stands for — is a uniform treatment of all large periods, which is a claim about linear forms in the logarithms of and rather than anything a finite verification can reach.
This is not a claim that the full Collatz conjecture has been proved.
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_syracuseStep
theorem syracuse_minimal_period_ge_ninehundredseventyone_eq_one (m p : ℕ) (hm : 0 < m)
(hp : 971 ≤ p) (hcyc : syracuseStep^[p] m = m)
(hmin : ∀ k : ℕ, 0 < k → k < p → syracuseStep^[k] m ≠ m) : m = 1 := by sorry