Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Validated retrograde and direct orbits of transverse Hopf type

Open
BirkhoffGlobalSection.validated_binding_orbits_transverse_hopf

by Mazecto · Oct 5, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

celestial-mechanicsdynamical-systemshamiltonian-dynamics

Let 0<μ≤1/20<\mu\le 1/20<μ≤1/2 and 2.1≤c≤2.1+10−62.1\le c\le 2.1+10^{-6}2.1≤c≤2.1+10−6, and let φ\varphiφ be the Levi-Civita Hamiltonian flow on the selected component Σμ,c\Sigma_{\mu,c}Σμ,c​. Then there are closed orbits γr,γd\gamma_r,\gamma_dγr​,γd​ of φ\varphiφ such that:

  • γr\gamma_rγr​ satisfies the strict astronomical retrograde inequality of Joung--van Koert, Proposition 2.2, at every time, and γd\gamma_dγd​ the strict direct inequality;
  • for each of them, the radial projection y↦y/∣y∣y\mapsto y/|y|y↦y/∣y∣ of the orbit to the round sphere S3S^3S3 is the end of an antipodally equivariant transverse isotopy (for the standard contact structure ker⁡(12∑q dp−p dq)\ker(\tfrac12\sum q\,dp-p\,dq)ker(21​∑qdp−pdq)) that starts at the positive standard Hopf circle.

The second item says the orbits are transverse unknots of self-linking number −1-1−1, and that their antipodal images in RP3\mathbb{RP}^3RP3 are rational unknots, as for the symmetric orbits of the source.

This is the validated-numerics part of Joung--van Koert's Theorem 1.2. The two symmetric orbits are enclosed by computer-assisted shooting; the proof of Theorem 3.1 checks the sign conditions of Proposition 2.2 along them, and the simple, once-winding planar projection gives the Hopf knot type of the Levi-Civita lift.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_BirkhoffGlobalSection_TransverseHopf
Formal statement
namespace BirkhoffGlobalSection

/-- Joung--van Koert, Theorem 1.2 with Proposition 2.2 and the proof of
Theorem 3.1: in the validated rectangle the Levi-Civita flow has a retrograde
and a direct closed orbit satisfying the strict astronomical sign conditions,
and the radial projection of each orbit to the round three-sphere is
equivariantly transversely isotopic to the positive standard Hopf circle
(unknotted, self-linking number `-1`). -/
theorem validated_binding_orbits_transverse_hopf (μ c : ℝ)
    (hμ0 : 0 < μ) (hμhalf : μ ≤ 1 / 2)
    (hc0 : 21 / 10 ≤ c) (hc1 : c ≤ 21 / 10 + 1 / 1000000)
    (φ : Flow ℝ (LeftEnergyState μ c))
    (hφ : IsLeviCivitaHamiltonianFlow μ c φ) :
    ∃ γr γd : PeriodicOrbit φ,
      IsAstronomicallyRetrogradeOrbit φ γr ∧
      IsAstronomicallyDirectOrbit φ γd ∧
      Nonempty (EquivariantTransverseHopfIsotopy
        (radialNormalize '' orbitSet γr)) ∧
      Nonempty (EquivariantTransverseHopfIsotopy
        (radialNormalize '' orbitSet γd)) := by sorry

end BirkhoffGlobalSection
Source
Joung--van Koert, Computational symplectic topology and symmetric orbits in the restricted three-body problem, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19159v3, Theorem 1.2, Proposition 2.2, proof of Theorem 3.1.

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me