Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

(22), p. 35 — one DFO step decreases F by at least (L − L₀)/2 ‖η̂ − β‖²

Proved
SubsetShrink.DFO.eq_22

by mikedeng1 · Oct 15, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

first-order-methodsp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1sufficient-decrease

Let f:Rp→Rf:\mathbb R^p\to\mathbb Rf:Rp→R be differentiable and convex with L0L_0L0​-Lipschitz gradient, L0≥0L_0\ge0L0​≥0, and let L≥L0L\ge L_0L≥L0​ with L>0L>0L>0, λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb Rλ∈R, q∈{1,2}q\in\{1,2\}q∈{1,2}, k≥1k\ge1k≥1. Put F(β)=f(β)+λ∥β∥qF(\beta)=f(\beta)+\lambda\|\beta\|_qF(β)=f(β)+λ∥β∥q​. If ∥β∥0≤k\|\beta\|_0\le k∥β∥0​≤k and

η^∈S(β−1L∇f(β); k; λLℓq),\hat\eta\in\mathrm S\Big(\beta-\tfrac1L\nabla f(\beta);\,k;\,\tfrac\lambda L\ell_q\Big),η^​∈S(β−L1​∇f(β);k;Lλ​ℓq​),

then

F(β)≥L−L02∥η^−β∥22+F(η^).F(\beta)\ge\frac{L-L_0}2\|\hat\eta-\beta\|_2^2+F(\hat\eta).F(β)≥2L−L0​​∥η^​−β∥22​+F(η^​).

Applied with β=β(m)\beta=\beta^{(m)}β=β(m) and η^=β(m+1)\hat\eta=\beta^{(m+1)}η^​=β(m+1), this is the sufficient-decrease inequality of the DFO method, from which both parts of Proposition 2 follow.

Formalization Note No sign condition on λ\lambdaλ or fff is needed here. L>0L>0L>0 is required for the step 1/L1/L1/L to be the paper's.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_SubsetShrink_DFO_Model
Formal statement
namespace SubsetShrink.DFO

/-- (22), p. 35 (Mazumder, Radchenko & Dedieu, arXiv:1708.03288v4). Let `f : ℝᵖ → ℝ` be
differentiable and convex with `L₀`-Lipschitz gradient ((8)), `L ≥ L₀` with `L > 0`,
`q ∈ {1, 2}`, `k ≥ 1`. If `‖β‖₀ ≤ k` and `η̂ ∈ S(β − (1/L)∇f(β); k; (λ/L)ℓ_q)`, then
`F(β) ≥ ((L − L₀)/2)‖η̂ − β‖₂² + F(η̂)`, where `F(β) = f(β) + λ‖β‖_q`. -/
theorem eq_22 {p : ℕ} (f : E p → ℝ) (L0 L lam : ℝ) (q k : ℕ)
    (hq : q = 1 ∨ q = 2) (hk : 1 ≤ k)
    (hdiff : Differentiable ℝ f) (hconv : ConvexOn ℝ Set.univ f) (hL0nn : 0 ≤ L0)
    (hL0 : ∀ β α : E p, ‖gradient f β - gradient f α‖ ≤ L0 * ‖β - α‖)
    (hL : L0 ≤ L) (hLpos : 0 < L)
    (β ηhat : E p) (hβ : l0 β ≤ k)
    (hη : IsThresh (β - (1 / L) • gradient f β) k (lam / L) q ηhat) :
    (L - L0) / 2 * ‖ηhat - β‖ ^ 2 + F f lam q ηhat ≤ F f lam q β := by sorry

end SubsetShrink.DFO
Source
Mazumder, Radchenko & Dedieu, Subset Selection with Shrinkage, arXiv:1708.03288v4, p. 35, proof of Proposition 2 (A.1), (22)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 15, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 15, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me