Proof of Proposition 7, p. 29 — Δ_H < Λ_{H1}
ProvedCustomerVoice.Thresholds.DeltaH_lt_LambdaH1inequalityp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1threshold
Let satisfy the standing assumptions , , , . Then the high type's A-Learning threshold is strictly smaller than the first high-type O-Learning threshold:
This is the first of the three comparisons in the proof of Proposition 7: the high type's incentive to tell the truth binds at a lower ratio under A-Learning than under O-Learning when the seller-acceptance constraint binds.
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_CustomerVoice_Thresholds_Setting
Formal statement
namespace CustomerVoice.Thresholds
theorem DeltaH_lt_LambdaH1 (M : Model) (hM : M.Standing) :
M.DeltaH < M.LambdaH1 := by sorry
end CustomerVoice.Thresholds
Source
Guo, The Voice of Customers in Customization, SSRN working paper 3994319 (version of 2023-11-29, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3994319), p. 29, Appendix, Proof of Proposition 7
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.