If a·t² + b·π² is rational for a real logarithm t ≠ 0 of an algebraic number, with a ≠ 0 and b rational, then e^{iγ/π} is transcendental for every rational γ ≠ 0
ProvedDiazModulus.recip_pi_log_of_rational_quadratic_relationLet be real with algebraic, and let with and . Then is transcendental for every .
The case is DiazModulus.recip_pi_log_of_torsion_rational_modulus. The hypothesis cannot hold when , since would then be algebraic, against Hermite–Lindemann; the proof needs no case split. With , and it gives DiazModulus.dilog_half_irrational_or_exp_i_div_pi_transcendental.
Proof. Suppose is algebraic, so that is a logarithm of an algebraic number. The relation gives , a rational combination of the logarithms and , hence again a logarithm of an algebraic number. The matrix has determinant , and its entries lie in a field of transcendence degree one, since is algebraic over . By the four exponentials theorem in transcendence degree one (DiazModulus.four_exponentials_trdeg_one), its rows or its columns are linearly dependent over . Either way with not both zero, which is impossible because is real and non-zero and is purely imaginary.
Novelty. Not asserted. It is Brownawell's Corollary 5 (1974, p. 23) at , followed by rational scaling. The statement for general was not found in the sources read.
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
open Complex ComplexConjugate
namespace DiazModulus
theorem recip_pi_log_of_rational_quadratic_relation (t : ℝ) (ht : t ≠ 0)
(he : IsAlgebraic ℚ (Complex.exp (t : ℂ))) (a b c : ℚ) (ha : a ≠ 0)
(hrel : (a : ℝ) * t ^ 2 + (b : ℝ) * Real.pi ^ 2 = (c : ℝ))
(γ : ℚ) (hγ : γ ≠ 0) :
Transcendental ℚ (Complex.exp (Complex.I * (γ : ℂ) / ((Real.pi : ℝ) : ℂ))) := by
sorry
end DiazModulus