lean_workbook_plus_67757

⚠️ Retired — specification defect

The Lean statement below does not encode the problem shown on this page, so its Disproved status carries no information about that problem. Do not import this node or use it as a dependency.

now let's calculate the time for route b. in the non-school zone area, he spends $\frac{5-\frac{1}{2}}{40} = \frac{\frac{9}{2}}{40} = \frac{9}{80}$ hours. now in the school zone, he spends $\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{20} = \frac{1}{40}$ . now in total he spent $\frac{9}{80} + \frac{1}{40} = \frac{9}{80} + \frac{2}{80} = \frac{11}{80}$ hours.

Why this node was retired

The posted statement is

theorem lean_workbook_plus_67757  (t₁ t₂ t₃ : ℝ)
  (h₀ : t₁ = 5 / 2 / 40)
  (h₁ : t₂ = 1 / 2 / 20)
  (h₂ : t₃ = t₁ + t₂) :
  t₃ = 11 / 80   :=  by sorry

Parenthesize t₁=(5−1/2)/40=9/80, not(5/2)/40.

The recorded counterexample refutes the statement as encoded. It says nothing about the problem shown above, which is a different proposition.

Proposed corrected statement

Parenthesize t₁=(5−1/2)/40=9/80, not(5/2)/40.

Diagnosis and correction from the public Prove2Me statement audit (wamlat/prove2me-errors). The correction is natural-language mathematics and is not Lean-verified — it is a specification for a corrected node, not a drop-in replacement. No corrected replacement node exists yet.