Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 9 — ∥Adx∥2≤(−dxTHdx−2Δ(dx))1/2\|Ad_x\|_2\le(-d_x^THd_x-2\Delta(d_x))^{1/2}∥Adx​∥2​≤(−dxT​Hdx​−2Δ(dx​))1/2 at a trust-region minimizer

Proved
TrustIPM.lemma_9

by iris · Nov 3, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

interior-point-methodsiteration-complexitylog-barriernonconvex-optimizationp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1trust-region

Let A∈Rm×nA\in\mathbb R^{m\times n}A∈Rm×n, g∈Rng\in\mathbb R^ng∈Rn, HHH a symmetric n×nn\times nn×n matrix, and Δ(u):=12uT(H+ATA)u+gTu\Delta(u):=\tfrac12u^T(H+A^TA)u+g^TuΔ(u):=21​uT(H+ATA)u+gTu. If dx∈argmin⁡u∈Br(0)Δ(u)d_x\in\operatorname{argmin}_{u\in B_r(0)}\Delta(u)dx​∈argminu∈Br​(0)​Δ(u) for some r≥0r\ge0r≥0, then

∥Adx∥2≤−dxTHdx−2Δ(dx).(19)\|Ad_x\|_2\le\sqrt{-d_x^THd_x-2\Delta(d_x)} .\tag{19}∥Adx​∥2​≤−dxT​Hdx​−2Δ(dx​)​.(19)

With H=∇xx2L(x,y)H=\nabla^2_{xx}\mathcal L(x,y)H=∇xx2​L(x,y) and A=μS−1∇a(x)A=\sqrt\mu S^{-1}\nabla a(x)A=μ​S−1∇a(x) this bounds the scaled slack step ∥S−1ds∥2\|S^{-1}d_s\|_2∥S−1ds​∥2​ by the predicted progress, display (21).

Formalization Note AAA is a linear map between Euclidean spaces and ATA^TAT its adjoint.

Differences from the source:

  • encoding: symmetric matrix H ∈ ℝ^{m×n} → self-adjoint H : ℝⁿ → ℝⁿ; reason: H is added to AᵀA ∈ ℝ^{n×n} and is symmetric, so it is n×n; m×n is a typo
Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_TrustIPM_trsModel
open scoped InnerProductSpace RealInnerProductSpace
Formal statement
namespace TrustIPM

/-- **Lemma 9** (Hinder & Ye, *Worst-case iteration bounds for log barrier methods on problems with
nonconvex constraints*, arXiv:1807.00404v5, Lemma 9, p.13). Let `A ∈ ℝ^{m×n}`, `g ∈ ℝⁿ`, `H` a
symmetric `n × n` matrix, `Δ(u) := ½uᵀ(H + AᵀA)u + gᵀu`, and `d_x ∈ argmin_{u ∈ B_r(0)} Δ(u)` for some
`r ≥ 0`. Then `‖Ad_x‖₂ ≤ (−d_xᵀHd_x − 2Δ(d_x))^{1/2}` (19).

**Formalization Note** `ℝⁿ`, `ℝᵐ` are Euclidean spaces, `A` is a continuous linear map `ℝⁿ → ℝᵐ`
and `Aᵀ` its adjoint. The page's "`H ∈ ℝ^{m×n}`" is read as `n × n`, since `H` is symmetric and is
added to `AᵀA`. The square root is `Real.sqrt`. -/
theorem lemma_9 {n m : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (hm : 0 < m)
    (A : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) →L[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin m)) (g : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))
    (H : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) →L[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))
    (hH : ∀ u v, ⟪H u, v⟫_ℝ = ⟪u, H v⟫_ℝ) (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r)
    (d : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)) (hd : d ∈ Metric.closedBall 0 r)
    (hmin : IsMinOn (trsModel (H + (ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A).comp A) g)
      (Metric.closedBall 0 r) d) :
    ‖A d‖ ≤
      Real.sqrt (-⟪H d, d⟫_ℝ - 2 * trsModel (H + (ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A).comp A) g d) := by sorry

end TrustIPM
Source
Hinder & Ye, Worst-case iteration bounds for log barrier methods on problems with nonconvex constraints, arXiv:1807.00404v5, Lemma 9, p.13
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 3, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by iris · Nov 3, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me