Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Result 3: interaction-independent order in the restricted chamber

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P99.nonlocalOrder_iff

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

For a two-qubit unitary UUU, let β\betaβ be an actual interaction-content witness: UUU is locally equivalent, up to global phase, to Uβ=exp⁡[−i∑k=13βkσk⊗σk]U_\beta=\exp[-i\sum_{k=1}^3\beta_k\sigma_k\otimes\sigma_k]Uβ​=exp[−i∑k=13​βk​σk​⊗σk​], where σ1,σ2,σ3\sigma_1,\sigma_2,\sigma_3σ1​,σ2​,σ3​ are the Pauli matrices X,Y,ZX,Y,ZX,Y,Z and π/4≥β1≥β2≥∣β3∣\pi/4\ge\beta_1\ge\beta_2\ge|\beta_3|π/4≥β1​≥β2​≥∣β3​∣. For real triples, x≺syx\prec_s yx≺s​y means s-majorization: sort their absolute coordinates in descending order, give the smallest coordinate the sign of the product, and compare the first coordinate and the two sums x1+x2∓x3x_1+x_2\mp x_3x1​+x2​∓x3​. Let VVV have canonical content βV\beta^VβV, and write βU=β\beta^U=\betaβU=β for that of UUU. Assume β1U+∣β3U∣≤π/4\beta^U_1+|\beta^U_3|\le\pi/4β1U​+∣β3U​∣≤π/4 and β1V+∣β3V∣≤π/4\beta^V_1+|\beta^V_3|\le\pi/4β1V​+∣β3V​∣≤π/4. With interaction cost in the ideal free-local-control model, define UUU to be more nonlocal than VVV when CH(V)≤CH(U)C_H(V)\le C_H(U)CH​(V)≤CH​(U) for every Hermitian two-qubit Hamiltonian HHH. Then

[ ∀H, CH(V)≤CH(U) ]⟺βV≺sβU.[\,\forall H,\ C_H(V)\le C_H(U)\,]\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad\beta^V\prec_s\beta^U.[∀H, CH​(V)≤CH​(U)]⟺βV≺s​βU.

The comparison is a preorder on gates and descends to local-equivalence classes. Local gates are included.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P99
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P99

open scoped Matrix Kronecker NNReal ENNReal

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P10 (pauli)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P32 (evolution)

noncomputable section

/-- PDF p.8, Result 3 (definition pp.7–8): both contents must lie in the restricted
chamber. Includes local gates without the proof's invalid C_H(U)=1 shortcut there. -/
theorem nonlocalOrder_iff (U V : TwoMatrix) (bU bV : Triple)
    (hU : HasContent U bU) (hV : HasContent V bV)
    (hRU : bU 0 + |bU 2| ≤ Real.pi / 4) (hRV : bV 0 + |bV 2| ≤ Real.pi / 4) :
    MoreNonlocal U V ↔ SMajorized bV bU := by sorry

end

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P99
Source
Characterization of non-local gates, arXiv:quant-ph/0205100v3, PDF p. 8, Result 3: interaction-independent order in the restricted chamber
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every pair of complex two-qubit matrices U,VU,VU,V and real triples bU,bVb^U,b^VbU,bV, assume, for each pair (W,b)=(U,bU)(W,b)=(U,b^U)(W,b)=(U,bU) and (W,b)=(V,bV)(W,b)=(V,b^V)(W,b)=(V,bV), that WWW is unitary, b1≤b0b_1\le b_0b1​≤b0​, ∣b2∣≤b1|b_2|\le b_1∣b2​∣≤b1​, b0≤π/4b_0\le\pi/4b0​≤π/4, and there exist single-qubit unitary matrices A,B,C,DA,B,C,DA,B,C,D such that W=(A⊗B)e−iJ(b)(C⊗D)W=(A\otimes B)e^{-iJ(b)}(C\otimes D)W=(A⊗B)e−iJ(b)(C⊗D), where J(b)=b0X⊗X+b1Y⊗Y+b2Z⊗ZJ(b)=b_0X\otimes X+b_1Y\otimes Y+b_2Z\otimes ZJ(b)=b0​X⊗X+b1​Y⊗Y+b2​Z⊗Z and X,Y,ZX,Y,ZX,Y,Z are the standard Pauli matrices; assume additionally that b0U+∣b2U∣≤π/4b^U_0+|b^U_2|\le\pi/4b0U​+∣b2U​∣≤π/4 and b0V+∣b2V∣≤π/4b^V_0+|b^V_2|\le\pi/4b0V​+∣b2V​∣≤π/4. For a Hermitian two-qubit matrix HHH and a unitary two-qubit matrix WWW, define CH(W)∈[0,∞]C_H(W)\in[0,\infty]CH​(W)∈[0,∞] as the infimum of all t≥0t\ge0t≥0 such that, for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0ε>0, there exist a finite list of nonnegative durations τ1,…,τm\tau_1,\ldots,\tau_mτ1​,…,τm​, single-qubit unitary matrices Ej,FjE_j,F_jEj​,Fj​ for j=0,…,mj=0,\ldots,mj=0,…,m, and a complex zzz with ∣z∣=1|z|=1∣z∣=1, satisfying ∑jτj=t\sum_j\tau_j=t∑j​τj​=t and

∥(Em⊗Fm)e−iτmH⋯(E1⊗F1)e−iτ1H(E0⊗F0)−zW∥op<ε;\left\|(E_m\otimes F_m)e^{-i\tau_mH}\cdots (E_1\otimes F_1)e^{-i\tau_1H}(E_0\otimes F_0)-zW\right\|_{\mathrm{op}}<\varepsilon;​(Em​⊗Fm​)e−iτm​H⋯(E1​⊗F1​)e−iτ1​H(E0​⊗F0​)−zW​op​<ε;

empty lists are allowed and the infimum of an empty set of feasible times is +∞+\infty+∞. For any real triple xxx, define σ(x)\sigma(x)σ(x) to have coordinates max⁡j∣xj∣\max_j|x_j|maxj​∣xj​∣, ∑j∣xj∣−max⁡j∣xj∣−min⁡j∣xj∣\sum_j|x_j|-\max_j|x_j|-\min_j|x_j|∑j​∣xj​∣−maxj​∣xj​∣−minj​∣xj​∣, and the signed minimum absolute coordinate, negative when x0x1x2<0x_0x_1x_2<0x0​x1​x2​<0 and nonnegative otherwise. The conclusion is that CH(V)≤CH(U)C_H(V)\le C_H(U)CH​(V)≤CH​(U) for every Hermitian two-qubit matrix HHH if and only if all three inequalities

σ(bV)0≤σ(bU)0,σ(bV)0+σ(bV)1−σ(bV)2≤σ(bU)0+σ(bU)1−σ(bU)2,σ(bV)0+σ(bV)1+σ(bV)2≤σ(bU)0+σ(bU)1+σ(bU)2\sigma(b^V)_0\le\sigma(b^U)_0,\qquad \sigma(b^V)_0+\sigma(b^V)_1-\sigma(b^V)_2 \le\sigma(b^U)_0+\sigma(b^U)_1-\sigma(b^U)_2,\qquad \sigma(b^V)_0+\sigma(b^V)_1+\sigma(b^V)_2 \le\sigma(b^U)_0+\sigma(b^U)_1+\sigma(b^U)_2σ(bV)0​≤σ(bU)0​,σ(bV)0​+σ(bV)1​−σ(bV)2​≤σ(bU)0​+σ(bU)1​−σ(bU)2​,σ(bV)0​+σ(bV)1​+σ(bV)2​≤σ(bU)0​+σ(bU)1​+σ(bU)2​

hold. The quantifier over HHH includes the zero matrix and all other Hermitian two-qubit matrices.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me