In a Q̄-space of rational functions of u, the ratio x₁/x₀ of a 2×3 configuration is p(u)/q(u) with p, q coprime and not both constant
ProvedDiazModulus.rational_space_configuration_coprime_ratioLet be transcendental, that is, (the algebraic numbers); spans and linear independence are over . Let be a -subspace of all of whose elements lie in , the subfield of generated by and , and let be linearly independent and linearly independent, with for all (a configuration in ). Then there are coprime with and .
That is, the ratio is in lowest terms, and it is not an algebraic number.
Proof. Both and lie in , and because the families are independent, so lies in the field . So it is for polynomials over , with since . Dividing and by gives coprime and , and after cancelling , which is non-zero because is transcendental. If and were constants and , then would force by the independence of , and are not coprime; so .
Novelty. Not found in the sources read; routine.
import Definitions.Def_DiazModulus
open Complex ComplexConjugate
namespace DiazModulus
open Polynomial in
theorem rational_space_configuration_coprime_ratio (u : ℂ) (hu : u ∉ Qbar) (W : Submodule (↥Qbar) ℂ)
(hrat : ∀ w ∈ W, w ∈ IntermediateField.adjoin Qbar ({u} : Set ℂ))
(x : Fin 2 → ℂ) (y : Fin 3 → ℂ) (hx : LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) x)
(hy : LinearIndependent (↥Qbar) y) (hxy : ∀ i j, x i * y j ∈ W) :
∃ p q : (↥Qbar)[X], IsCoprime p q ∧ 1 ≤ max p.natDegree q.natDegree ∧
x 1 * aeval u q = x 0 * aeval u p := by
sorry
end DiazModulus