Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Corollary 18: explicit XZ quantum/private capacity expansion

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50.xz_capacities_expansion

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All systems are nonzero finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces. A channel is complex-linear, completely positive and trace preserving. Its receiver and full complementary channel are obtained from the same isometric dilation. Write Q(N)Q(N)Q(N) and P(N)P(N)P(N) for the unassisted operational quantum and private capacities, allowing arbitrary collective codes over independent uses with vanishing reliability error and environmental leakage. Write Ic(N)=max⁡ρ[S(N(ρ))−S(Nc(ρ))]I_c(N)=\max_\rho[S(N(\rho))-S(N^c(\rho))]Ic​(N)=maxρ​[S(N(ρ))−S(Nc(ρ))], where the maximum includes every density operator. Entropies and logarithms are in bits, with 0log⁡0=00\log 0=00log0=0. The diamond norm has no factor 1/21/21/2.

Let Cp(ρ)=(1−p)2ρ+(p−p2)XρX+p2YρY+(p−p2)ZρZC_p(\rho)=(1-p)^2\rho+(p-p^2)X\rho X+p^2Y\rho Y+(p-p^2)Z\rho ZCp​(ρ)=(1−p)2ρ+(p−p2)XρX+p2YρY+(p−p2)ZρZ, representing independent equal X and Z error probabilities ppp. There exist KQ,KP≥0K_Q,K_P\ge0KQ​,KP​≥0 and 0<δ≤10<\delta\le10<δ≤1 such that for every 0<p<δ0<p<\delta0<p<δ,

1−2h(p)≤Q(Cp)≤1−2h(p)−32p2log⁡2p+KQp2,1-2h(p)\le Q(C_p)\le1-2h(p)-32p^2\log_2p+K_Qp^2,1−2h(p)≤Q(Cp​)≤1−2h(p)−32p2log2​p+KQ​p2, 1−2h(p)≤P(Cp)≤1−2h(p)−96p2log⁡2p+KPp2.1-2h(p)\le P(C_p)\le1-2h(p)-96p^2\log_2p+K_Pp^2.1−2h(p)≤P(Cp​)≤1−2h(p)−96p2log2​p+KP​p2.

This is the unconditional numbered corollary, with both capacities and both sides of each bound.

Source Note. The preceding source text supports its optimizing-input identity only by numerics. The corollary is transcribed with that proof gap disclosed, without adding an optimizer hypothesis.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P50
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder

open Filter

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50

variable {A B E F : Type}

variable [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] [Fintype B] [DecidableEq B]

variable [Fintype E] [DecidableEq E] [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F]

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P67
  (IsIsometry receiverChannel complementaryChannel maximumCoherentInformation
    dilationPower idealJoint)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P80 (log2)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P69 (diamond choi)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P07 (fullTracePrivateCapacity)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Frontier18.P17 (clock)

/-- Corollary 18, PDF p.18: unconditional printed statement, including both upper
and lower bounds. The preceding optimizer identity is supported only by numerics
in the source; this proof gap is disclosed, not converted to an extra hypothesis. -/
theorem xz_capacities_expansion :
    ∃ Kq Kp : ℝ, 0 ≤ Kq ∧ 0 ≤ Kp ∧ ∃ delta : ℝ, 0 < delta ∧ delta ≤ 1 ∧
      ∀ p ∈ Set.Ioo 0 delta,
        (1 - 2 * binEntropy2 p ≤ dilationQuantumCapacity (xzDilation p) ∧
          dilationQuantumCapacity (xzDilation p) ≤
            1 - 2 * binEntropy2 p - 32 * p ^ 2 * log2 p + Kq * p ^ 2) ∧
        (1 - 2 * binEntropy2 p ≤ fullTracePrivateCapacity (xzDilation p) ∧
          fullTracePrivateCapacity (xzDilation p) ≤
            1 - 2 * binEntropy2 p - 96 * p ^ 2 * log2 p + Kp * p ^ 2) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50

end
Source
Quantum and private capacities of low-noise channels, arXiv:1705.04335v3, PDF p. 18, Corollary 18: explicit XZ quantum/private capacity expansion
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For 0<p<10<p<10<p<1, put w(p)=((1−p)2,p−p2,p2,p−p2)w(p)=((1-p)^2,p-p^2,p^2,p-p^2)w(p)=((1−p)2,p−p2,p2,p−p2) and Vpb,j;a=wj(p)(σj)baV_p{}_{b,j;a}=\sqrt{w_j(p)}(\sigma_j)_{ba}Vp​b,j;a​=wj​(p)​(σj​)ba​, where the four σj\sigma_jσj​ are the identity and usual Pauli X,Y,ZX,Y,ZX,Y,Z matrices, and define Np(X)=Tr⁡E(VpXVp†)N_p(X)=\operatorname{Tr}_E(V_pXV_p^\dagger)Np​(X)=TrE​(Vp​XVp†​). Let h2(p)=[−plog⁡p−(1−p)log⁡(1−p)]/log⁡2h_2(p)=[-p\log p-(1-p)\log(1-p)]/\log2h2​(p)=[−plogp−(1−p)log(1−p)]/log2 and log⁡2x=log⁡x/log⁡2\log_2x=\log x/\log2log2​x=logx/log2. Define Q(Vp)Q(V_p)Q(Vp​) as the supremum of nonnegative rates rrr for which positive message dimensions MnM_nMn​ and encoding and decoding channels exist for every n≥0n\ge0n≥0, their entanglement transmission fidelities through Np⊗nN_p^{\otimes n}Np⊗n​ tend to 111, and, for every s>0s>0s>0, eventually r−s≤log⁡2Mn/nr-s\le\log_2M_n/nr−s≤log2​Mn​/n. That fidelity is the overlap with ∣ΦMn⟩⟨ΦMn∣|\Phi_{M_n}\rangle\langle\Phi_{M_n}|∣ΦMn​​⟩⟨ΦMn​​∣ after applying the encoder, Np⊗nN_p^{\otimes n}Np⊗n​, and decoder to the second half of ∣ΦMn⟩=Mn−1/2∑m∣m,m⟩|\Phi_{M_n}\rangle=M_n^{-1/2}\sum_m|m,m\rangle∣ΦMn​​⟩=Mn−1/2​∑m​∣m,m⟩. Define P(Vp)P(V_p)P(Vp​) as the supremum of nonnegative rates rrr such that, for every ϵ,s>0\epsilon,s>0ϵ,s>0, all sufficiently large positive nnn admit M>0M>0M>0, density matrices ρm\rho_mρm​, and positive semidefinite decoding matrices FjF_jFj​ summing to III, with r−s≤log⁡2M/nr-s\le\log_2M/nr−s≤log2​M/n and

∥Ω−1M∑m∣m,m⟩⟨m,m∣⊗ΩE∥1<ϵ,Ω=1M∑m,j∣m,j⟩⟨m,j∣⊗Tr⁡Bn ⁣[(Fj⊗I)Vp⊗nρm(Vp⊗n)†],ΩE=Tr⁡m,jΩ.\left\|\Omega-\frac1M\sum_m|m,m\rangle\langle m,m|\otimes\Omega_E\right\|_1<\epsilon, \quad \Omega=\frac1M\sum_{m,j}|m,j\rangle\langle m,j| \otimes\operatorname{Tr}_{B^n}\!\left[(F_j\otimes I)V_p^{\otimes n}\rho_m(V_p^{\otimes n})^\dagger\right], \quad \Omega_E=\operatorname{Tr}_{m,j}\Omega .​Ω−M1​m∑​∣m,m⟩⟨m,m∣⊗ΩE​​1​<ϵ,Ω=M1​m,j∑​∣m,j⟩⟨m,j∣⊗TrBn​[(Fj​⊗I)Vp⊗n​ρm​(Vp⊗n​)†],ΩE​=Trm,j​Ω.

Density matrices are positive semidefinite with trace 111; channels are finite Kraus sums with ∑jKj†Kj=I\sum_jK_j^\dagger K_j=I∑j​Kj†​Kj​=I; and ∥X∥1=Re⁡Tr⁡X†X\|X\|_1=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}\sqrt{X^\dagger X}∥X∥1​=ReTrX†X​. There exist Kq,Kp≥0K_q,K_p\ge0Kq​,Kp​≥0 and 0<δ≤10<\delta\le10<δ≤1 such that, for every 0<p<δ0<p<\delta0<p<δ,

1−2h2(p)≤Q(Vp)≤1−2h2(p)−32p2log⁡2p+Kqp2,1−2h2(p)≤P(Vp)≤1−2h2(p)−96p2log⁡2p+Kpp2.1-2h_2(p)\le Q(V_p)\le1-2h_2(p)-32p^2\log_2p+K_qp^2, \qquad 1-2h_2(p)\le P(V_p)\le1-2h_2(p)-96p^2\log_2p+K_pp^2.1−2h2​(p)≤Q(Vp​)≤1−2h2​(p)−32p2log2​p+Kq​p2,1−2h2​(p)≤P(Vp​)≤1−2h2​(p)−96p2log2​p+Kp​p2.

The quantum sequence includes a zeroth block, with real division by zero interpreted as 000; the rate requirements concern its large positive blocks.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me