Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Bounds for wind∞\mathrm{wind}_\inftywind∞​ at a nondegenerate puncture

Proved
FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_hasWindInfAt_hasEigenWind

by Mazecto · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

conley-zehnder-indexpseudoholomorphic-curvesreeb-dynamicssymplectic-geometrysymplectizationwinding-numbers

Let S=H−1(1)⊂R4S=H^{-1}(1)\subset\mathbb{R}^4S=H−1(1)⊂R4 be a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ a smooth dλ0d\lambda_0dλ0​-compatible complex structure on ξ\xiξ. Let uuu be a finite-energy J~\tilde JJ~-holomorphic curve on Br(z0)∖{z0}B_r(z_0)\setminus\{z_0\}Br​(z0​)∖{z0​} such that z0z_0z0​ is a nondegenerate puncture (Hryniewicz, Definition 2.9) of sign ε=±1\varepsilon=\pm1ε=±1 with asymptotic limit PPP, and π du\pi\,duπdu does not vanish identically on any punctured neighbourhood of z0z_0z0​. Then wind∞\mathrm{wind}_\inftywind∞​ of uuu at z0z_0z0​ is the winding of an eigenvalue μ\muμ of APA_PAP​ with εμ<0\varepsilon\mu<0εμ<0. In particular wind∞≤α−(P)\mathrm{wind}_\infty\le\alpha^-(P)wind∞​≤α−(P) if ε=1\varepsilon=1ε=1 and wind∞≥α+(P)\mathrm{wind}_\infty\ge\alpha^+(P)wind∞​≥α+(P) if ε=−1\varepsilon=-1ε=−1.

Formalization Note PPP need not be nondegenerate. "Not identically zero near z0z_0z0​" is: every Bρ(z0)∖{z0}B_\rho(z_0)\setminus\{z_0\}Bρ​(z0​)∖{z0​} contains zzz with dlambdaDensity H u z ≠ 0. The bounds are stated for every a with IsAlphaMinus J P a and every b with IsAlphaPlus J P b.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_FiniteEnergyPlane_Winding
Formal statement
namespace FiniteEnergyPlane

open MeasureTheory Metric Filter Topology
open scoped ContDiff ENNReal Real

/-- Let `z₀` be a puncture of sign `ε` of a finite-energy `J̃`-holomorphic curve `u`, nondegenerate
in the sense of Definition 2.9 with asymptotic limit `P`, near which `π du` does not vanish
identically. Then `wind_∞` of `u` at `z₀` is the winding number of an eigenvalue `μ` of `A_P` with
`εμ < 0`. In particular `wind_∞ ≤ α⁻(P)` at a positive puncture and `wind_∞ ≥ α⁺(P)` at a negative one. -/
theorem exists_hasWindInfAt_hasEigenWind (H : V 1 → ℝ) (hH : IsStrictlyStarShapedLevel H)
    (J : V 1 → V 1 →L[ℝ] V 1) (hJ : IsCompatibleXiStructure H J)
    (z₀ : ℂ) (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (u : ℂ → V 1)
    (hu : IsFiniteEnergyCurve H J (ball z₀ r \ {z₀}) u) (P : ReebOrbit H) (ε : ℝ)
    (hε : ε = 1 ∨ ε = -1) (hnd : IsNondegenerateEnd H u (cylEndAt z₀) P ε)
    (hne : ∀ ρ > 0, ∃ z ∈ ball z₀ ρ \ {z₀}, dlambdaDensity H u z ≠ 0) :
    ∃ (k : ℤ) (μ : ℝ), ε * μ < 0 ∧ HasEigenWind J P μ k ∧ HasWindInfAt H u (cylEndAt z₀) ε k ∧
      (ε = 1 → ∀ a : ℤ, IsAlphaMinus J P a → k ≤ a) ∧
      (ε = -1 → ∀ b : ℤ, IsAlphaPlus J P b → b ≤ k) := by
  sorry

end FiniteEnergyPlane
Source
U. Hryniewicz, Systems of global surfaces of section for dynamically convex Reeb flows on the 3-sphere, J. Symplectic Geom. 12 (2014), arXiv:1105.2077, Section 2.2.4; U. Hryniewicz, Fast finite-energy planes in symplectizations and applications, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 1859–1931, arXiv:0812.4076, Section 3
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

FiniteEnergyPlane.exists_hasWindInfAt_hasEigenWind

Data and hypotheses. Let H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R have a strictly star-shaped level and JJJ be a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure for HHH. Let z0∈Cz_0\in\mathbb{C}z0​∈C, r>0r>0r>0, and let u:C→R4u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 be a finite-energy curve on the punctured disk D∗={z:0<∣z−z0∣<r}D^*=\{z:0<|z-z_0|<r\}D∗={z:0<∣z−z0​∣<r}. Let P=(x,T)P=(x,T)P=(x,T) be a Reeb orbit of HHH and ε∈{1,−1}\varepsilon\in\{1,-1\}ε∈{1,−1}, and assume:

  • NdEnd(u,cylz0,P,ε)\mathrm{NdEnd}(u, \mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}, P, \varepsilon)NdEnd(u,cylz0​​,P,ε) (defined below);
  • for every ρ>0\rho>0ρ>0 there is zzz with 0<∣z−z0∣<ρ0<|z-z_0|<\rho0<∣z−z0​∣<ρ and ω0(∂sw(z),∂tw(z))≠0\omega_0\big(\partial_s w(z), \partial_t w(z)\big)\neq 0ω0​(∂s​w(z),∂t​w(z))=0, where w=pr∘uw=\mathrm{pr}\circ uw=pr∘u (the dλd\lambdadλ-density of uuu does not vanish identically on any punctured neighbourhood of z0z_0z0​).

Conclusion. There exist k∈Zk\in\mathbb{Z}k∈Z and μ∈R\mu\in\mathbb{R}μ∈R such that

  1. εμ<0\varepsilon\mu<0εμ<0;
  2. EW(P,μ)=k\mathrm{EW}(P,\mu) = kEW(P,μ)=k: there exists at least one eigenvector of the asymptotic operator of (J,P)(J,P)(J,P) with eigenvalue μ\muμ, and every such eigenvector vvv satisfies windξ(P,v)=k\mathrm{wind}_\xi(P,v)=kwindξ​(P,v)=k;
  3. wind∞(u,cylz0,ε)=k\mathrm{wind}_\infty(u, \mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}, \varepsilon) = kwind∞​(u,cylz0​​,ε)=k;
  4. if ε=1\varepsilon = 1ε=1: k≤ak\le ak≤a for every integer aaa with α−(a)\alpha^-(a)α−(a);
  5. if ε=−1\varepsilon = -1ε=−1: b≤kb\le kb≤k for every integer bbb with α+(b)\alpha^+(b)α+(b).

Here:

  • "vvv is an eigenvector with eigenvalue μ\muμ" means: v:R→R4v:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^4v:R→R4 is C∞C^\inftyC∞ and 111-periodic, v(t)∈ξx(Tt)v(t)\in\xi_{x(Tt)}v(t)∈ξx(Tt)​ for all ttt, v(t)≠0v(t)\neq0v(t)=0 for some ttt, and for all ttt
J(x(Tt))(−v′(t)+T DR(x(Tt))v(t))=μ v(t).J\big(x(Tt)\big)\Big(-v'(t) + T\,DR\big(x(Tt)\big)v(t)\Big) = \mu\,v(t).J(x(Tt))(−v′(t)+TDR(x(Tt))v(t))=μv(t).
  • windξ(P,v)=k\mathrm{wind}_\xi(P,v)=kwindξ​(P,v)=k means the loop t↦Ξx(Tt)(v(t))t\mapsto\Xi_{x(Tt)}(v(t))t↦Ξx(Tt)​(v(t)) has wind=k\mathrm{wind}=kwind=k.
  • α−(a)\alpha^-(a)α−(a) means: there is μ′<0\mu'<0μ′<0 with EW(P,μ′)=a\mathrm{EW}(P,\mu')=aEW(P,μ′)=a, and for every μ′<0\mu'<0μ′<0 and every integer k′k'k′ with EW(P,μ′)=k′\mathrm{EW}(P,\mu')=k'EW(P,μ′)=k′ one has k′≤ak'\le ak′≤a.
  • α+(b)\alpha^+(b)α+(b) means: there is μ′≥0\mu'\ge0μ′≥0 with EW(P,μ′)=b\mathrm{EW}(P,\mu')=bEW(P,μ′)=b, and for every μ′≥0\mu'\ge0μ′≥0 and every integer k′k'k′ with EW(P,μ′)=k′\mathrm{EW}(P,\mu')=k'EW(P,μ′)=k′ one has b≤k′b\le k'b≤k′.
  • wind∞(u,cylz0,ε)=k\mathrm{wind}_\infty(u, \mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}, \varepsilon) = kwind∞​(u,cylz0​​,ε)=k means: there is s0s_0s0​ such that for every s≥s0s\ge s_0s≥s0​ the loop
t↦ΞW(s,εt)(πξ(W(s,εt)) ∂sW(s,εt)),W=Wcylz0,t\mapsto \Xi_{W(s,\varepsilon t)}\Big(\pi_\xi\big(W(s,\varepsilon t)\big)\,\partial_s W(s,\varepsilon t)\Big),\qquad W=W_{\mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}},t↦ΞW(s,εt)​(πξ​(W(s,εt))∂s​W(s,εt)),W=Wcylz0​​​,

has wind=k\mathrm{wind}=kwind=k, where ∂sW(s,t′)\partial_sW(s,t')∂s​W(s,t′) is the derivative of WWW at (s,t′)(s,t')(s,t′) in direction (1,0)(1,0)(1,0) (for ε=−1\varepsilon=-1ε=−1 the loop runs with ttt reversed).

Items 4 and 5 are implications: if no integer aaa (resp. bbb) satisfies α−\alpha^-α− (resp. α+\alpha^+α+), they hold trivially. Only one of 4, 5 is non-vacuous for the given ε\varepsilonε. PPP is not required to be prime, and no hypothesis on the linearized Reeb flow along PPP is assumed beyond NdEnd\mathrm{NdEnd}NdEnd.

Meaning of the notions used

Throughout, the ambient space is R4\mathbb{R}^4R4 with coordinates (y0,y1,y2,y3)(y_0,y_1,y_2,y_3)(y0​,y1​,y2​,y3​) (the code's space of functions on a 4-element index set), and C\mathbb{C}C is identified with R2\mathbb{R}^2R2 via z=s+itz = s + itz=s+it.

Linear algebra. j0(v)=(−v1,v0,−v3,v2)j_0(v) = (-v_1, v_0, -v_3, v_2)j0​(v)=(−v1​,v0​,−v3​,v2​) and

ω0(u,v)=u0v1−u1v0+u2v3−u3v2,λx(v)=12 ω0(x,v).\omega_0(u,v) = u_0v_1 - u_1v_0 + u_2v_3 - u_3v_2, \qquad \lambda_x(v) = \tfrac12\,\omega_0(x,v).ω0​(u,v)=u0​v1​−u1​v0​+u2​v3​−u3​v2​,λx​(v)=21​ω0​(x,v).

Star-shaped level. "HHH has a strictly star-shaped level" means: H:R4→RH:\mathbb{R}^4\to\mathbb{R}H:R4→R is C∞C^\inftyC∞; for every u≠0u\neq 0u=0 there is exactly one r>0r>0r>0 with H(ru)=1H(ru)=1H(ru)=1; and dHx(x)>0dH_x(x) > 0dHx​(x)>0 at every xxx with H(x)=1H(x)=1H(x)=1. Write S={H=1}S = \{H = 1\}S={H=1}.

Reeb field and contact plane. XH(x)=j0(∇H(x))X_H(x) = j_0(\nabla H(x))XH​(x)=j0​(∇H(x)), and R(x)=λx(XH(x))−1XH(x)R(x) = \lambda_x(X_H(x))^{-1} X_H(x)R(x)=λx​(XH​(x))−1XH​(x) (with the convention 0−1=00^{-1} = 00−1=0). The plane ξx\xi_xξx​ is {v:λx(v)=0 and dHx(v)=0}\{v : \lambda_x(v) = 0 \text{ and } dH_x(v) = 0\}{v:λx​(v)=0 and dHx​(v)=0} (defined for every xxx, not only on SSS). The projection πξ\pi_\xiπξ​ is πξ(x)v=v−λx(v) R(x)\pi_\xi(x)v = v - \lambda_x(v)\,R(x)πξ​(x)v=v−λx​(v)R(x).

Compatible JJJ. "JJJ is a compatible ξ\xiξ-structure for HHH" means: J:R4→L(R4,R4)J:\mathbb{R}^4\to \mathrm{L}(\mathbb{R}^4,\mathbb{R}^4)J:R4→L(R4,R4) is C∞C^\inftyC∞, and for every x∈Sx\in Sx∈S and all v,w∈ξxv,w\in\xi_xv,w∈ξx​: J(x)v∈ξxJ(x)v\in\xi_xJ(x)v∈ξx​, J(x)2v=−vJ(x)^2 v = -vJ(x)2v=−v, ω0(v,J(x)v)>0\omega_0(v,J(x)v) > 0ω0​(v,J(x)v)>0 if v≠0v\neq 0v=0, and ω0(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0(v,w)\omega_0(J(x)v,J(x)w) = \omega_0(v,w)ω0​(J(x)v,J(x)w)=ω0​(v,w). Nothing is required of J(x)J(x)J(x) off ξx\xi_xξx​ or off SSS.

Radial projection. For y∈R4y\in\mathbb{R}^4y∈R4 let σ(y)\sigma(y)σ(y) be the unique r>0r>0r>0 with H(ry)=1H(ry)=1H(ry)=1 if such rrr exists, and σ(y)=1\sigma(y)=1σ(y)=1 otherwise (in particular σ(0)=1\sigma(0)=1σ(0)=1). Then pr(y)=σ(y) y\mathrm{pr}(y) = \sigma(y)\,ypr(y)=σ(y)y and a(y)=−12log⁡σ(y)a(y) = -\tfrac12\log\sigma(y)a(y)=−21​logσ(y).

Almost complex structure J~\tilde JJ~. For y∈R4y\in\mathbb{R}^4y∈R4 put x=pr(y)x = \mathrm{pr}(y)x=pr(y), r=σ(y)r=\sigma(y)r=σ(y), α(v)=r2 dHx(x) dHx(v)\alpha(v) = \frac{r}{2\,dH_x(x)}\,dH_x(v)α(v)=2dHx​(x)r​dHx​(v), β(v)=r λx(v)\beta(v) = r\,\lambda_x(v)β(v)=rλx​(v), w(v)=v−2α(v) y−β(v) r−1R(x)w(v) = v - 2\alpha(v)\,y - \beta(v)\,r^{-1}R(x)w(v)=v−2α(v)y−β(v)r−1R(x), and

J~(y)v=α(v) r−1R(x)−2β(v) y+J(x) w(v).\tilde J(y)v = \alpha(v)\,r^{-1}R(x) - 2\beta(v)\,y + J(x)\,w(v).J~(y)v=α(v)r−1R(x)−2β(v)y+J(x)w(v).

Finite-energy curve. For U⊆CU\subseteq\mathbb{C}U⊆C, "uuu is a finite-energy curve on UUU" means: u:C→R4u:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}^4u:C→R4 is C∞C^\inftyC∞ on UUU; u(z)≠0u(z)\neq 0u(z)=0 for z∈Uz\in Uz∈U; at every z∈Uz\in Uz∈U, uuu is (real-)differentiable and ∂su(z)+J~(u(z)) ∂tu(z)=0\partial_s u(z) + \tilde J(u(z))\,\partial_t u(z) = 0∂s​u(z)+J~(u(z))∂t​u(z)=0; and

E(u)=sup⁡φ∫Umax⁡(0, φ′(a)(∂sa λw(∂tw)−∂ta λw(∂sw))+φ(a) ω0(∂sw,∂tw)) dz<∞,E(u) = \sup_{\varphi}\int_U \max\Big(0,\ \varphi'(a)\big(\partial_s a\,\lambda_w(\partial_t w) - \partial_t a\,\lambda_w(\partial_s w)\big) + \varphi(a)\,\omega_0(\partial_s w,\partial_t w)\Big)\,dz < \infty,E(u)=φsup​∫U​max(0, φ′(a)(∂s​aλw​(∂t​w)−∂t​aλw​(∂s​w))+φ(a)ω0​(∂s​w,∂t​w))dz<∞,

where a=a∘ua = a\circ ua=a∘u, w=pr∘uw = \mathrm{pr}\circ uw=pr∘u, and φ\varphiφ ranges over C∞C^\inftyC∞ nondecreasing functions R→[0,1]\mathbb{R}\to[0,1]R→[0,1]. Values of uuu outside UUU are unconstrained. Derivatives here and below are Fréchet derivatives, with the convention that the derivative at a point of non-differentiability is 000.

Reeb orbit. A Reeb orbit PPP of HHH is a pair (x,T)(x,T)(x,T) with T>0T>0T>0 and x:R→R4x:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^4x:R→R4 such that H(x(τ))=1H(x(\tau)) = 1H(x(τ))=1, x′(τ)=R(x(τ))x'(\tau) = R(x(\tau))x′(τ)=R(x(τ)) and x(τ+T)=x(τ)x(\tau+T) = x(\tau)x(τ+T)=x(τ) for all τ\tauτ. TTT is any positive period (not necessarily the minimal one).

End parametrizations. cyl∞(s,t)=e2πse2πit\mathrm{cyl}_\infty(s,t) = e^{2\pi s}e^{2\pi i t}cyl∞​(s,t)=e2πse2πit (large circles, counterclockwise in ttt), and for z0∈Cz_0\in\mathbb{C}z0​∈C, cylz0(s,t)=z0+e−2πse−2πit\mathrm{cyl}_{z_0}(s,t) = z_0 + e^{-2\pi s}e^{-2\pi i t}cylz0​​(s,t)=z0​+e−2πse−2πit (small circles around z0z_0z0​, clockwise in ttt). For such a map eee write We(s,t)=pr(u(e(s,t)))W_e(s,t) = \mathrm{pr}(u(e(s,t)))We​(s,t)=pr(u(e(s,t))) and Ae(s,t)=a(u(e(s,t)))A_e(s,t) = a(u(e(s,t)))Ae​(s,t)=a(u(e(s,t))). Note that only large sss enters the conditions below; for small sss these maps may leave the region where uuu is constrained.

"Nondegenerate end". For ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R}ε∈R, NdEnd(u,e,P,ε)\mathrm{NdEnd}(u, e, P, \varepsilon)NdEnd(u,e,P,ε) means: there are d,c∈Rd, c\in\mathbb{R}d,c∈R and b>0b>0b>0 such that, uniformly in t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}t∈R, as s→+∞s\to+\inftys→+∞,

Ae(s,t)−εTs−d→0,ebs ∣We(s,t)−x(εTt+c)∣→0.A_e(s,t) - \varepsilon T s - d \to 0, \qquad e^{bs}\,\big|W_e(s,t) - x(\varepsilon T t + c)\big| \to 0.Ae​(s,t)−εTs−d→0,ebs​We​(s,t)−x(εTt+c)​→0.

(This is an exponential convergence condition on uuu along the end; it contains no hypothesis on the linearized Reeb flow of PPP.)

ξ\xiξ-coordinates. For x,v∈R4x, v\in\mathbb{R}^4x,v∈R4, with ∣x∣|x|∣x∣ the Euclidean norm, define Q1x=(−x2,x3,x0,−x1)Q_1x = (-x_2, x_3, x_0, -x_1)Q1​x=(−x2​,x3​,x0​,−x1​), Q2x=(x3,x2,−x1,−x0)Q_2x = (x_3, x_2, -x_1, -x_0)Q2​x=(x3​,x2​,−x1​,−x0​),

ei(x)=∣x∣−1(Qix−dHx(Qix)dHx(x) x)(i=1,2),e_i(x) = |x|^{-1}\Big(Q_ix - \frac{dH_x(Q_ix)}{dH_x(x)}\,x\Big)\quad(i=1,2),ei​(x)=∣x∣−1(Qi​x−dHx​(x)dHx​(Qi​x)​x)(i=1,2),

(with 0−1=00^{-1}=00−1=0 and division by 000 giving 000), and

Ξx(v)=ω0(v,e2(x))+i ω0(e1(x),v) ∈C.\Xi_x(v) = \omega_0(v, e_2(x)) + i\,\omega_0(e_1(x), v)\ \in\mathbb{C}.Ξx​(v)=ω0​(v,e2​(x))+iω0​(e1​(x),v) ∈C.

Winding of a loop. For f:R→Cf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}f:R→C and k∈Zk\in\mathbb{Z}k∈Z, wind(f)=k\mathrm{wind}(f) = kwind(f)=k means: fff is continuous, 111-periodic, never 000, and there is a continuous θ:R→R\theta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}θ:R→R with f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t)f(t) = |f(t)|e^{i\theta(t)}f(t)=∣f(t)∣eiθ(t) for all ttt and θ(1)−θ(0)=2πk\theta(1) - \theta(0) = 2\pi kθ(1)−θ(0)=2πk.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Mazecto · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me