Counterexample structure (c) — Two E677 tables that agree off one row are equal
ProvedFiniteMagmaE677.eq_of_e677_ops_agree_off_one_rowLet and be two operations on the same finite set , both satisfying E677. Suppose that for every and every , so that the two tables can differ only in the row of . Then . Neither operation is assumed to satisfy E255.
So a search that changes one row of a finite E677 table never reaches a different E677 table; in particular, no counterexample is one row away from an E677 table that satisfies E255.
Related results. In one finite E677 table, two rows are never equal: if for every , then (I. Tencer, ETP Zulip thread "FINITE: 677 -> 255", 2024-12-21; also J. Hyun, same thread, 2026-05-17). The statement above compares two tables. The two-table statement was not found in the sources searched: the ETP blueprint, the ETP paper (arXiv:2512.07087v2) and the ETP Zulip thread up to 2026-10-14.
import Definitions.Def_FiniteMagmaE677 import Mathlib universe u open FiniteMagmaE677
theorem FiniteMagmaE677.eq_of_e677_ops_agree_off_one_row
{α : Type u} [Finite α] (op op' : α → α → α)
(h : FiniteMagmaE677.E677 op) (h' : FiniteMagmaE677.E677 op') (a : α)
(hrows : ∀ u : α, u ≠ a → ∀ v : α, op' u v = op u v) :
op' = op := by sorry