Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Forward rate of polarization: small sum of root fidelities

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P14.rate_of_polarization_forward

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let WWW be a binary-input classical–quantum channel with normalized density outputs and uniform-prior Holevo information I(W)>0I(W)>0I(W)>0, in bits. Fix real constants R<I(W)R<I(W)R<I(W) and β<1/2\beta<1/2β<1/2. For every N=2nN=2^nN=2n, form the split channels WN(i)W_N^{(i)}WN(i)​ using the actual polar encoder, the exposed classical history, and uniform future bits. There exists a sequence of information sets AN⊆{1,…,N}A_N\subseteq\{1,\ldots,N\}AN​⊆{1,…,N} such that

∣AN∣≥NRfor every n≥0,∑i∈ANF(WN(i))=o ⁣(2−Nβ).|A_N|\ge NR\quad\hbox{for every }n\ge0,\qquad \sum_{i\in A_N}\sqrt{F(W_N^{(i)})}=o\!\left(2^{-N^\beta}\right).∣AN​∣≥NRfor every n≥0,i∈AN​∑​F(WN(i)​)​=o(2−Nβ).

Here FFF is squared fidelity and the asymptotic limit is n→∞n\to\inftyn→∞. The sum, rather than its average or maximum, is controlled. The source allows negative RRR and negative β\betaβ; for negative RRR the empty information set is admissible. This assertion supplies the reliability input for the coding theorem.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P14
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P14

open Filter MeasureTheory

open scoped ENNReal NNReal ComplexOrder BigOperators

open QAlgorithms.RealRegisters (Hilbert)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P33 (IsDensity)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P13 (compression)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Renew46.P44 (wordOutput)

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

/-- Theorem 3, forward clause, PDF p.5; proof p.9. The quantity is a SUM,
not an average or maximum. Negative R and beta are allowed as printed.
The cardinality condition holds at every blocklength, including N=1. -/
theorem rate_of_polarization_forward {I : Type} (W : Bit → OutputCoefficients I) (hW : IsBinaryCqChannel W)
    (hI : 0 < symmetricInformation W) (R beta : ℝ)
    (hR : ENNReal.ofReal R < symmetricInformation W) (hb : beta < 1 / 2) :
    ∃ A : (n : ℕ) → Finset (PolarWire n),
      (∀ n, (2 ^ n : ℕ) * R ≤ ((A n).card : ℝ)) ∧
      Asymptotics.IsLittleO atTop
        (fun n => ∑ i ∈ A n, Real.sqrt (squaredCqFidelity (splitChannel W n i)))
        (polarDecay beta 1) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P14

end
Source
Polar codes for classical-quantum channels, arXiv:1109.2591v3, PDF p. 5, Theorem 3 (Rate of Polarization), forward assertion
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For any type III, suppose W:Z2→CI×IW:\mathbb Z_2\to\mathbb C^{I\times I}W:Z2​→CI×I has density outputs: each W(b)W(b)W(b) has a countable expansion W(b)ij=∑r′ur(i)vr(j)‾W(b)_{ij}=\sum'_r u_r(i)\overline{v_r(j)}W(b)ij​=∑r′​ur​(i)vr​(j)​, with ur,vr∈ℓ2(I;C)u_r,v_r\in\ell^2(I;\mathbb C)ur​,vr​∈ℓ2(I;C) and summable products ∥ur∥∥vr∥\|u_r\|\|v_r\|∥ur​∥∥vr​∥, all its finite quadratic forms are real and nonnegative, and its real diagonal is summable with sum one. For an array XXX, let OXO_XOX​ be a chosen bounded operator with coefficients XXX, or zero if none exists. Define D2(X∥Y)D_2(X\Vert Y)D2​(X∥Y) as the supremum over all finite orthonormal families, including the empty family, of

{max⁡ ⁣{0,Re⁡tr⁡(f(A)−Alog⁡C−A+C)log⁡2},ker⁡C⊆ker⁡A,∞,otherwise,\begin{cases} \displaystyle\max\!\left\{0, \frac{\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(f(A)-A\log C-A+C)}{\log2}\right\}, &\ker C\subseteq\ker A,\\ \infty,&\text{otherwise}, \end{cases}⎩⎨⎧​max{0,log2Retr(f(A)−AlogC−A+C)​},∞,​kerC⊆kerA,otherwise,​

where A,CA,CA,C compress OX,OYO_X,O_YOX​,OY​ to the family, f(t)=tlog⁡tf(t)=t\log tf(t)=tlogt, and matrix functions use continuous functional calculus. Put W‾=(W(0)+W(1))/2\overline W=(W(0)+W(1))/2W=(W(0)+W(1))/2 and I(W)=(D2(W(0)∥W‾)+D2(W(1)∥W‾))/2\mathcal I(W)=(D_2(W(0)\Vert\overline W)+D_2(W(1)\Vert\overline W))/2I(W)=(D2​(W(0)∥W)+D2​(W(1)∥W))/2. Assume I(W)>0\mathcal I(W)>0I(W)>0, and let R,β∈RR,\beta\in\mathbb RR,β∈R satisfy max⁡{R,0}<I(W)\max\{R,0\}<\mathcal I(W)max{R,0}<I(W) and β<12\beta<\tfrac12β<21​. For N=2nN=2^nN=2n, define the bit-reversal integer rev⁡n(r)=(∑k<nbk(r)2n−1−k) mod N\operatorname{rev}_n(r)=(\sum_{k<n}b_k(r)2^{n-1-k})\bmod Nrevn​(r)=(∑k<n​bk​(r)2n−1−k)modN, where bk(r)b_k(r)bk​(r) is bit kkk, and the matrix Grt=∏k<nK(bk(rev⁡n(r)),bk(t))G_{rt}=\prod_{k<n}K(b_k(\operatorname{rev}_n(r)),b_k(t))Grt​=∏k<n​K(bk​(revn​(r)),bk​(t)) over Z2\mathbb Z_2Z2​, with K(a,0)=1, K(a,1)=aK(a,0)=1,\ K(a,1)=aK(a,0)=1, K(a,1)=a. Define split arrays, indexed by (h,x)∈Z2i×IN(h,x)\in\mathbb Z_2^i\times I^N(h,x)∈Z2i​×IN, by

Vi(n)(b)(h,x),(h′,y)={2−(N−1)∑u∈Z2Nu<i=h, ui=b∏t<NW((uG)t)xt,yt,h=h′,0,h≠h′.V_i^{(n)}(b)_{(h,x),(h',y)} =\begin{cases} 2^{-(N-1)} \displaystyle\sum_{\substack{u\in\mathbb Z_2^N\\u_{<i}=h,\ u_i=b}} \prod_{t<N}W((uG)_t)_{x_t,y_t},&h=h',\\ 0,&h\ne h'. \end{cases}Vi(n)​(b)(h,x),(h′,y)​=⎩⎨⎧​2−(N−1)u∈Z2N​u<i​=h, ui​=b​∑​t<N∏​W((uG)t​)xt​,yt​​,0,​h=h′,h=h′.​

For a binary array VVV, let

F(V)=(Re⁡∑x′[R ⁣(R(OV(0))OV(1)R(OV(0)))ex]x)2,F(V)=\left(\operatorname{Re}\sum'_x \left[R\!\left(R(O_{V(0)})O_{V(1)}R(O_{V(0)})\right)e_x\right]_x\right)^2,F(V)=(Rex∑′​[R(R(OV(0)​)OV(1)​R(OV(0)​))ex​]x​)2,

where R(T)R(T)R(T) is a chosen positive bounded square root of TTT, or zero if none exists; a nonsummable complex sum is zero. There exist subsets An⊆{0,…,2n−1}A_n\subseteq\{0,\ldots,2^n-1\}An​⊆{0,…,2n−1} such that, for every nnn, 2nR≤∣An∣2^nR\le|A_n|2nR≤∣An​∣, and

∑i∈AnF(Vi(n))=o ⁣(2−(2n)β)(n→∞).\sum_{i\in A_n}\sqrt{F(V_i^{(n)})} =o\!\left(2^{-(2^n)^\beta}\right)\qquad(n\to\infty).i∈An​∑​F(Vi(n)​)​=o(2−(2n)β)(n→∞).

Equivalently, for every c>0c>0c>0, the sum is eventually at most c 2−(2n)βc\,2^{-(2^n)^\beta}c2−(2n)β. No nonnegativity requirement is imposed on RRR or β\betaβ; when R<0R<0R<0, the cardinality bound is automatic. The case n=0n=0n=0 is included, and no countability assumption on III is present.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me