Site-local potentials give Poisson-commuting constraints
ProvedWheelerDeWittSuperspace.poisson_eq_zero_of_sitewiseIf for every site the potential depends only on (and is ), then the classical lattice constraints satisfy
at every point with physical. This is the ultralocal (strong-coupling) case.
import Definitions.Def_WheelerDeWittSuperspace set_option autoImplicit false open Matrix
namespace WheelerDeWittSuperspace
/-- Milestone 7 (ultralocal case is first class): if every potential depends only on
the metric at its own site (the strong-coupling regime), the classical constraints
Poisson-commute everywhere. -/
theorem poisson_eq_zero_of_sitewise {X : Type*} [Fintype X] [DecidableEq X] (kappa Lam : ℝ)
(hkappa : kappa ≠ 0)
(R : Config X → X → ℝ) (hR : ∀ z, ContDiff ℝ 1 (fun h => R h z))
(hloc : ∀ z (h h' : Config X), h z = h' z → R h z = R h' z)
(x y : X) (w : Phase X) (hw : IsPhysical w.1) :
poisson (classicalConstraint kappa Lam R x) (classicalConstraint kappa Lam R y) w = 0 := by sorry
end WheelerDeWittSuperspace
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5
Read-back of WheelerDeWittSuperspace.poisson_eq_zero_of_sitewise.
Setting. Let be any finite type of "sites" with decidable equality. It is not assumed nonempty as a type, but the statement takes points , so every instance that has content has . A configuration is a map , written for and . All nine entries are independent real coordinates: symmetry is not built into the configuration space. So configuration space is . Write for the matrix . A phase-space point is a pair of two configurations: metric components and momentum components . All momentum entries per site are independent as well, so phase space is .
Binders and hypotheses. The theorem quantifies over:
- reals and , with the single hypothesis ( is arbitrary);
- a function , (a "potential", given as data), subject to:
- (regularity) for every site , the map is on the whole of . That includes non-symmetric and non-positive-definite "metrics", not only physical ones.
- (locality) for every site and all configurations : if as arrays (all nine entries equal), then . Equivalently, for some function , which by the regularity hypothesis is on .
- two sites . They are arbitrary and may coincide.
- a phase-space point , with the hypothesis that is physical. For every site , the matrix is positive definite in Mathlib's sense: it is symmetric () and for every nonzero . There is no hypothesis on the momenta . In particular need not be symmetric in .
Definitions unfolded. For a real matrix , the volume is
where is the real square root, with the convention for . The DeWitt supermetric is
with the convention that division by gives . So whenever . For non-symmetric the formula is applied literally, entry by entry.
The potential at site is
The classical constraint at site is the function on phase space
For and , let be the configuration that is in the single entry and everywhere else. For a real function on phase space, write for the Fréchet derivative of at applied to the direction , and for the one applied to . Mathlib's convention is that the Fréchet derivative is the zero map at any point where is not differentiable. In that case all these partials are . The Poisson bracket at is
The sum runs over all nine ordered pairs , treated as independent coordinates, with no symmetrization or factor for .
Conclusion. Under the hypotheses above,
This is asserted at the given single phase-space point , which is any point whose metric part is positive definite at every site and whose momentum part is arbitrary. Since are universally quantified, it holds for all of them that satisfy the hypotheses.
Remarks on scope and edge cases.
- If , the bracket is . Its summands cancel identically by antisymmetry, whatever the derivatives are.
- With local as above, both terms of depend on phase space only through the nine entries and the nine entries at the same site .
- The derivatives are taken at in all coordinate directions. That includes directions that make non-symmetric. Because is physical, at and hence on a neighbourhood of , so near the volume and are given by the formulas without the or conventions. Away from physical points the conclusion says nothing.
- The hypotheses can be satisfied simultaneously, so the statement is not vacuous. For example, (constant, hence and local), , any , a one-point set, and the identity metric at every site.
- No quantum constant () and no wavefunction appear in this statement.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.