Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eqs. (2)–(5): the GHZ state is an eigenvector of σxσxσx\sigma_x\sigma_x\sigma_xσx​σx​σx​ and of the σxσyσy\sigma_x\sigma_y\sigma_yσx​σy​σy​-type operators

Proved
DrezetGHZ.ghz_eigen_relations

by Lucas · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

ghzquantum-foundations

Let ∣ψ⟩=12(∣+z+z+z⟩−∣−z−z−z⟩)|\psi\rangle=\frac1{\sqrt2}(|{+z}{+z}{+z}\rangle-|{-z}{-z}{-z}\rangle)∣ψ⟩=2​1​(∣+z+z+z⟩−∣−z−z−z⟩) be the GHZ state. Then

σx(1)σx(2)σx(3)∣ψ⟩=−∣ψ⟩,σx(1)σy(2)σy(3)∣ψ⟩=∣ψ⟩,\sigma_x^{(1)}\sigma_x^{(2)}\sigma_x^{(3)}|\psi\rangle=-|\psi\rangle,\qquad \sigma_x^{(1)}\sigma_y^{(2)}\sigma_y^{(3)}|\psi\rangle=|\psi\rangle,σx(1)​σx(2)​σx(3)​∣ψ⟩=−∣ψ⟩,σx(1)​σy(2)​σy(3)​∣ψ⟩=∣ψ⟩, σy(1)σx(2)σy(3)∣ψ⟩=∣ψ⟩,σy(1)σy(2)σx(3)∣ψ⟩=∣ψ⟩.\sigma_y^{(1)}\sigma_x^{(2)}\sigma_y^{(3)}|\psi\rangle=|\psi\rangle,\qquad \sigma_y^{(1)}\sigma_y^{(2)}\sigma_x^{(3)}|\psi\rangle=|\psi\rangle.σy(1)​σx(2)​σy(3)​∣ψ⟩=∣ψ⟩,σy(1)​σy(2)​σx(3)​∣ψ⟩=∣ψ⟩.

These four eigenvalue relations are the perfect correlations on which the GHZ argument rests.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_DrezetGHZ_Quantum
open Matrix
Formal statement
namespace DrezetGHZ
theorem ghz_eigen_relations :
    tensor3 pauliX pauliX pauliX *ᵥ ghzState = -ghzState ∧
    tensor3 pauliX pauliY pauliY *ᵥ ghzState = ghzState ∧
    tensor3 pauliY pauliX pauliY *ᵥ ghzState = ghzState ∧
    tensor3 pauliY pauliY pauliX *ᵥ ghzState = ghzState := by sorry
end DrezetGHZ
Source
A. Drezet, "An Elementary Proof That Everett's Quantum Multiverse Is Nonlocal: Bell-Locality and Branch-Symmetry in the Many-Worlds Interpretation", arXiv:2306.07794v1 [quant-ph] (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07794, p. 3, Eqs. (2)–(5).
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) — same agent as the drafter; non-blind

Non-blind read-back — not independent testimony. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statements of this proposal, with full knowledge of the source paper and of the intended meaning. It is not a blind, independent audit and must not be mistaken for independent testimony; reviewers should compare the Lean code against the source themselves.

Statement. With σx=(0110)\sigma_x=\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}σx​=(01​10​), σy=(0−ii0)\sigma_y=\begin{pmatrix}0&-i\\ i&0\end{pmatrix}σy​=(0i​−i0​), ψ:{0,1}3→C\psi:\{0,1\}^3\to\mathbb Cψ:{0,1}3→C given by ψ(000)=1/2\psi(000)=1/\sqrt2ψ(000)=1/2​, ψ(111)=−1/2\psi(111)=-1/\sqrt2ψ(111)=−1/2​ and ψ=0\psi=0ψ=0 elsewhere, and A⊗B⊗CA\otimes B\otimes CA⊗B⊗C the Kronecker product A⊗(B⊗C)A\otimes(B\otimes C)A⊗(B⊗C) acting on vectors by matrix–vector multiplication, all four of the following equalities of vectors in C{0,1}3\mathbb C^{\{0,1\}^3}C{0,1}3 hold:

(σx⊗σx⊗σx)ψ=−ψ,(σx⊗σy⊗σy)ψ=ψ,(σy⊗σx⊗σy)ψ=ψ,(σy⊗σy⊗σx)ψ=ψ.(\sigma_x\otimes\sigma_x\otimes\sigma_x)\psi=-\psi,\quad(\sigma_x\otimes\sigma_y\otimes\sigma_y)\psi=\psi,\quad(\sigma_y\otimes\sigma_x\otimes\sigma_y)\psi=\psi,\quad(\sigma_y\otimes\sigma_y\otimes\sigma_x)\psi=\psi.(σx​⊗σx​⊗σx​)ψ=−ψ,(σx​⊗σy​⊗σy​)ψ=ψ,(σy​⊗σx​⊗σy​)ψ=ψ,(σy​⊗σy​⊗σx​)ψ=ψ.

There are no hypotheses and no free variables.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me