Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Density and orthogonal geometry of the time-zero subspace

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92.time_zero_density

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let (E,E+,θ)(E,E_+,\theta)(E,E+​,θ) be reflection positive, with canonical quotient qqq, null space NNN, and E0={v∈E+:θv=v}E_0=\{v\in E_+:\theta v=v\}E0​={v∈E+​:θv=v}. If a linear subspace D⊆E0D\subseteq E_0D⊆E0​ has dense image in E^\widehat EE, then DDD is dense in E0E_0E0​ and q(E0)=E^q(E_0)=\widehat Eq(E0​)=E. Moreover,

N=E+∩E0⊥=E+∩θ(E+)⊥,N=E_+\cap E_0^\perp=E_+\cap\theta(E_+)^\perp,N=E+​∩E0⊥​=E+​∩θ(E+​)⊥,

and N⊕E0⊕θ(N)N\oplus E_0\oplus\theta(N)N⊕E0​⊕θ(N) is an orthogonal direct sum and a closed subspace of EEE.

No group or cyclicity hypothesis is imposed, and the final closed subspace is not asserted to be all of EEE.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P92
Formal statement
noncomputable section

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92

open scoped ComplexConjugate BigOperators NNReal ENNReal

open MeasureTheory

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

universe u v

variable (E : Type u) [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E]

variable {E}

/-- Lemma 3.16, PDF p. 15. No one-parameter group or cyclicity assumption.
The final orthogonal sum is asserted closed, without asserting it is all of E. -/
theorem time_zero_density [hHilbert : CompleteSpace E] (r : ReflectionData E) (D : Submodule ℂ E)
    (hD : D ≤ timeZero r) (hDense : Dense (quotientImage r D)) :
    D.topologicalClosure = timeZero r ∧
    quotientImage r (timeZero r) = Set.univ ∧
    osNull r = r.plus ⊓ (timeZero r).orthogonal ∧
    osNull r = r.plus ⊓ (r.plus.map r.theta.toLinearMap).orthogonal ∧
    Submodule.IsOrtho (osNull r) (timeZero r) ∧
    Submodule.IsOrtho (osNull r) ((osNull r).map r.theta.toLinearMap) ∧
    Submodule.IsOrtho (timeZero r) ((osNull r).map r.theta.toLinearMap) ∧
    IsClosed ((osNull r ⊔ timeZero r ⊔ (osNull r).map r.theta.toLinearMap :
      Submodule ℂ E) : Set E) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P92

end
Source
Reflection positive one-parameter groups and dilations, arXiv:1312.6161v2, PDF p. 15, Lemma 3.16
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let EEE be a complete complex inner product space, let E+⊆EE_+\subseteq EE+​⊆E be a closed complex linear subspace, and let θ:E→E\theta:E\to Eθ:E→E be an involutive complex linear isometric bijection satisfying Re⁡⟨θv,v⟩≥0\operatorname{Re}\langle\theta v,v\rangle\geq0Re⟨θv,v⟩≥0 for every v∈E+v\in E_+v∈E+​. Let HrH_rHr​ be the separated completion of E+E_+E+​ for the possibly degenerate inner product ⟨θv,w⟩\langle\theta v,w\rangle⟨θv,w⟩, let q:E+→Hrq:E_+\to H_rq:E+​→Hr​ be its canonical map, and set

Z={v∈E+:θv=v},N={v∈E+:q(v)=0},Z=\{v\in E_+:\theta v=v\},\qquad N=\{v\in E_+:q(v)=0\},Z={v∈E+​:θv=v},N={v∈E+​:q(v)=0},

viewing both as subspaces of EEE. For every complex linear subspace D⊆ED\subseteq ED⊆E, if D⊆ZD\subseteq ZD⊆Z and {q(v):v∈E+, v∈D}\{q(v):v\in E_+,\ v\in D\}{q(v):v∈E+​, v∈D} is dense in HrH_rHr​, then all of the following hold:

D‾=Z,{q(v):v∈Z}=Hr,N=E+∩Z⊥,N=E+∩θ(E+)⊥.\overline D=Z,\qquad \{q(v):v\in Z\}=H_r,\qquad N=E_+\cap Z^\perp,\qquad N=E_+\cap\theta(E_+)^\perp.D=Z,{q(v):v∈Z}=Hr​,N=E+​∩Z⊥,N=E+​∩θ(E+​)⊥.

Moreover, NNN is orthogonal to ZZZ, NNN is orthogonal to θ(N)\theta(N)θ(N), ZZZ is orthogonal to θ(N)\theta(N)θ(N), and the subspace N+Z+θ(N)N+Z+\theta(N)N+Z+θ(N) is closed in EEE. Here closures and orthogonal complements are taken in the original space EEE, and orthogonality of two subspaces means that every vector in one has zero inner product with every vector in the other. Zero subspaces and a zero completion are included.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me