Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (2.6) — MjLPM^{LP}_jMjLP​ through the slot vector yLPy^{LP}yLP

Proved
SingleMachineSched.LPRelax.eq_2_6

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

lp-relaxationmean-busy-timep2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1schedulingtime-indexed

Let nnn jobs have integral processing times pj>0p_j > 0pj​>0 and integral release dates rj≥0r_j \ge 0rj​≥0, and let the horizon T∈NT \in \mathbb NT∈N bound the makespan of some feasible nonpreemptive schedule. For every job jjj, the mean busy time of jjj in the LP schedule is

MjLP=1pj∑τ=rjT−1yjτLP(τ+12),(2.6)M^{LP}_j = \frac{1}{p_j} \sum_{\tau = r_j}^{T-1} y^{LP}_{j\tau}\Big(\tau + \frac12\Big), \tag{2.6}MjLP​=pj​1​τ=rj​∑T−1​yjτLP​(τ+21​),(2.6)

where yjτLP=1y^{LP}_{j\tau} = 1yjτLP​=1 if the LP schedule processes jjj in [τ,τ+1)[\tau, \tau+1)[τ,τ+1) and 000 otherwise.

Combined with (2.1), this says that the objective of (D) at yLPy^{LP}yLP equals the objective of (R) at MLPM^{LP}MLP, which links Theorems 2.2 and 2.5 into Corollary 2.6.

Formalization Note The identity does not depend on how the jobs are indexed, so no sortedness hypothesis appears. The horizon hypothesis ensures that the LP schedule does not process jjj at or after TTT.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_SingleMachineSched_LPRelax_LPSchedule
import Definitions.Def_SingleMachineSched_LPRelax_RelaxationD
Formal statement
namespace SingleMachineSched.LPRelax

/-- Equation (2.6): the mean busy time of a job in the LP schedule is
`M^LP_j = (1/p_j) Σ_{τ=r_j}^{T-1} y^LP_{jτ} (τ + 1/2)`. -/
theorem eq_2_6 {n : ℕ} (p r : Fin n → ℕ) (T : ℕ)
    (hp : ∀ j, 0 < p j) (hT : IsMakespanBound p r T) (j : Fin n) :
    mLP p r j = (1 / (p j : ℝ)) * ∑ τ ∈ Finset.Ico (r j) T, yLP p r j τ * ((τ : ℝ) + 1 / 2) := by sorry

end SingleMachineSched.LPRelax
Source
Goemans, Queyranne, Schulz, Skutella & Wang, Single Machine Scheduling with Release Dates, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 15(2) (2002), p. 173, proof of Corollary 2.6, Eq. (2.6)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me