Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Unnumbered result: a GW can convert any behavior into any other

Proved
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P29.global_replacement

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All Bell scenarios have independent finite, nonempty Alice and Bob input and output alphabets. A behavior is a nonnegative conditional output law normalized at every input pair; NS\mathrm{NS}NS imposes both no-signaling marginal identities. Processing uses one initial box with rules and randomness fixed independently of the supplied behavior. For any normalized initial behavior PPP and any normalized target behavior QQQ, on possibly different scenarios, there exists a global wiring GGG such that

G(P)=Q.G(P)=Q.G(P)=Q.

Both behaviors may be signaling. The operation may depend on the chosen target, as in the source’s constant-output-kernel construction.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P29
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators ENNReal

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P29

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Advance50.P47
  (Box IsCorrelation IsNoSignaling HasLocalModel TwoLocalBoxes losrTransform
   correlationMixture)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P56 (IsLaw)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P47 (Law)

/-- PDF p.4, after (11): arbitrary normalized behaviors, including signaling
ones, can be replaced by a target-dependent GW. -/
theorem global_replacement {s t : BellScenario} (p : Behavior s) (q : Behavior t)
    (hp : IsCorrelation p) (hq : IsCorrelation q) :
    ∃ g : GlobalWiring s t, g.apply p = q := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P29

end
Source
Nonlocality free wirings and the distinguishability between Bell boxes, arXiv:1611.06932v2, PDF p. 4, Unnumbered result after (11)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let s,ts,ts,t be any Bell scenarios with finite nonempty question and answer sets X,Y,A,BX,Y,A,BX,Y,A,B and X′,Y′,A′,B′X',Y',A',B'X′,Y′,A′,B′. Let p(x,y,a,b)p(x,y,a,b)p(x,y,a,b) and q(χ,ψ,α,β)q(\chi,\psi,\alpha,\beta)q(χ,ψ,α,β) be real arrays satisfying nonnegativity and answer normalization at every question pair: ∑a,bp(x,y,a,b)=1\sum_{a,b}p(x,y,a,b)=1∑a,b​p(x,y,a,b)=1 and ∑α,βq(χ,ψ,α,β)=1\sum_{\alpha,\beta}q(\chi,\psi,\alpha,\beta)=1∑α,β​q(χ,ψ,α,β)=1. Then there exist nonnegative joint kernels I(x,y∣χ,ψ)I(x,y\mid\chi,\psi)I(x,y∣χ,ψ) and O(α,β∣a,b,x,y,χ,ψ)O(\alpha,\beta\mid a,b,x,y,\chi,\psi)O(α,β∣a,b,x,y,χ,ψ), each summing to one over its output variables for every choice of conditioning variables, such that

q(χ,ψ,α,β)=∑a,b,x,yO(α,β∣a,b,x,y,χ,ψ) p(x,y,a,b) I(x,y∣χ,ψ)q(\chi,\psi,\alpha,\beta)= \sum_{a,b,x,y} O(\alpha,\beta\mid a,b,x,y,\chi,\psi)\, p(x,y,a,b)\,I(x,y\mid\chi,\psi)q(χ,ψ,α,β)=a,b,x,y∑​O(α,β∣a,b,x,y,χ,ψ)p(x,y,a,b)I(x,y∣χ,ψ)

for every target question and answer tuple. Neither ppp nor qqq is assumed to have question-independent opposite-party marginals.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me