Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Optimality relations (11) of the proximal ADMM iterates

Proved
NonconvexSplitting.ProxADMM.eq11_optimality

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

admmnonconvex-optimizationp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Assume hhh is C2C^2C2 with bounded Hessian, PPP is proper and lower semicontinuous, ϕ\phiϕ is C2C^2C2 and convex, and β>0\beta > 0β>0. Let (xt,yt,zt)(x^t, y^t, z^t)(xt,yt,zt) be generated by the proximal ADMM. Then for every t≥0t \ge 0t≥0

{−zt+1−βM(xt+1−xt)∈∂P(yt+1),∇h(xt+1)−M∗zt+1=−∇ϕ(xt+1)+∇ϕ(xt),Mxt+1−yt+1=1β(zt−zt+1),\begin{cases} -z^{t+1} - \beta\mathcal M(x^{t+1} - x^t) \in \partial P(y^{t+1}),\\ \nabla h(x^{t+1}) - \mathcal M^* z^{t+1} = -\nabla\phi(x^{t+1}) + \nabla\phi(x^t),\\ \mathcal M x^{t+1} - y^{t+1} = \frac{1}{\beta}(z^t - z^{t+1}), \end{cases}⎩⎨⎧​−zt+1−βM(xt+1−xt)∈∂P(yt+1),∇h(xt+1)−M∗zt+1=−∇ϕ(xt+1)+∇ϕ(xt),Mxt+1−yt+1=β1​(zt−zt+1),​

where ∂P\partial P∂P is the limiting subdifferential.

These relations rewrite the first-order optimality conditions of the two subproblems in terms of the updated multiplier; Assumption 1 is not needed.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_Shared_LimitingSubdiff
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_Shared_StandingAssumptions
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_Shared_IsProxADMMSeq
open NonconvexSplitting.Shared

open Filter Topology
open scoped InnerProductSpace
Formal statement
namespace NonconvexSplitting.ProxADMM

/-- Eq. (11) of Li–Pong (p. 6): the relations satisfied by every proximal ADMM iterate. -/
theorem eq11_optimality {n m : ℕ} (h : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → ℝ) (P : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin m) → EReal)
    (phi : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → ℝ) (M : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) →L[ℝ] EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin m)) (β : ℝ)
    (hstd : StandingAssumptions h P phi β)
    (x : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)) (y z : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin m))
    (hseq : IsProxADMMSeq h P phi M β x y z) (t : ℕ) :
    -(z (t + 1)) - β • M (x (t + 1) - x t) ∈ LimitingSubdiff P (y (t + 1)) ∧
    gradient h (x (t + 1)) - ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint M (z (t + 1)) =
      -(gradient phi (x (t + 1))) + gradient phi (x t) ∧
    M (x (t + 1)) - y (t + 1) = (1 / β) • (z t - z (t + 1)) := by sorry

end NonconvexSplitting.ProxADMM
Source
Li & Pong, Global Convergence of Splitting Methods for Nonconvex Composite Optimization, arXiv:1407.0753v6, p. 6, Eq. (11) (derived from (8))
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me