No valid -partition of exists once
ProvedModularSchur.no_valid_partition_of_ge_madditive-combinatoricscombinatoricsmodular-schur-numbersnumber-theorysum-free-sets
This is the universal upper bound in its integer form.
Let and , and suppose . Then no family of subsets of is a valid -partition of into classes that are -sum-free modulo :
The obstruction is the single integer itself, which lies in and reduces to modulo , so whichever class receives it is not -sum-free.
Consequently for every and , uniformly in both. This is the bound that makes the search space finite and justifies capping the definition of at .
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_ModularSchurIntegerBridge
import Mathlib
open ModularSchur
open Finset
variable {m : ℕ}
Formal statement
theorem ModularSchur.no_valid_partition_of_ge_m (hm : 2 ≤ m) {ℓ k N : ℕ}
(hN : m ≤ N) (P : Fin k → Finset ℕ) (hP : IsValidPartitionNat m ℓ k N P) : False := by sorrySource
McKenna 2026, "Prime-power structure of the stable regime for modular Schur numbers", docs/paper/modular-schur.pdf in the same repository, Lemma 2.2 (Universal upper bound), integer form. Prior art: the paper cites this as [CMD2013, Eq. (2)]; see Chappelon, Revuelta Marchena and Sanz Dominguez, "Modular Schur numbers", Electron. J. Combin. 20(2) (2013) #P61, DOI 10.37236/2374, arXiv:1306.5635. Lean source: https://github.com/mysticflounder/modular-schur/blob/eb6098890f05eff39190e6cd8e41fdea53fa81f9/lean/ModularSchur/IntegerBridge.lean#L164-L174
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).