Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (46): sufficient decrease of the proximal gradient method

Proved
NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad.eq46_sufficient_decrease

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

nonconvex-optimizationp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1proximal-gradient

Let hhh and PPP satisfy the standing assumptions (hhh is C2C^2C2 with bounded Hessian; PPP is proper, closed, with well-defined proximal mappings). Let q:Rn→Rq : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}q:Rn→R be twice continuously differentiable and convex, ℓ>0\ell > 0ℓ>0, and suppose −ℓI⪯∇2h(x)+∇2q(x)⪯ℓI-\ell I \preceq \nabla^2 h(x) + \nabla^2 q(x) \preceq \ell I−ℓI⪯∇2h(x)+∇2q(x)⪯ℓI for all xxx. Let β>0\beta > 0β>0 and let (xt)(x^t)(xt) be generated by the proximal gradient update (43). Then for every t≥0t \ge 0t≥0,

h(xt+1)+P(xt+1)≤h(xt)+P(xt)+(ℓ2−12β)∥xt+1−xt∥2.h(x^{t+1}) + P(x^{t+1}) \le h(x^t) + P(x^t) + \Bigl(\frac{\ell}{2} - \frac{1}{2\beta}\Bigr)\|x^{t+1} - x^t\|^2 .h(xt+1)+P(xt+1)≤h(xt)+P(xt)+(2ℓ​−2β1​)∥xt+1−xt∥2.

When β<1/ℓ\beta < 1/\ellβ<1/ℓ the coefficient is negative, so the objective decreases along the iterates by a multiple of the squared step length.

Formalization Note Both sides are in EReal; when P(xt)=+∞P(x^t) = +\inftyP(xt)=+∞ the right side is +∞+\infty+∞. Only β>0\beta > 0β>0 is assumed, as the inequality itself does not need β<1/ℓ\beta < 1/\ellβ<1/ℓ.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_ProxGrad_StandingAssumptions
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_ProxGrad_HessianSandwich
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_ProxGrad_IsProxGradSeq
Formal statement
namespace NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad

/-- Eq. (46) of Li–Pong (p. 18), first and last members:
`h(x^{t+1}) + P(x^{t+1}) ≤ h(x^t) + P(x^t) + (ℓ/2 - 1/(2β)) ‖x^{t+1} - x^t‖²`, in `EReal`. -/
theorem eq46_sufficient_decrease {n : ℕ} (h q : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → ℝ) (P : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → EReal) (ℓ β : ℝ)
    (x : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))
    (hSA : StandingAssumptions h P) (hq : ContDiff ℝ 2 q) (hq_convex : ConvexOn ℝ Set.univ q)
    (hℓ : 0 < ℓ) (h44 : HessianSandwich h q ℓ) (hβ : 0 < β)
    (hx : IsProxGradSeq h P β x) (t : ℕ) :
    ((h (x (t + 1)) : ℝ) : EReal) + P (x (t + 1)) ≤
      ((h (x t) : ℝ) : EReal) + P (x t) +
        (((ℓ / 2 - 1 / (2 * β)) * ‖x (t + 1) - x t‖ ^ 2 : ℝ) : EReal) := by sorry

end NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad
Source
Li & Pong, Global Convergence of Splitting Methods for Nonconvex Composite Optimization, arXiv:1407.0753v6, p. 18, Eq. (46) (first and last members)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me