Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Negativity of the Wigner function at the origin: first Fock state

Proved
Wigner.fock_wigner_neg

by Lucas · Oct 18, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

analysisquantum-mechanics

A concrete witness of negativity: the Wigner function of the first excited Fock state is negative at the origin. In the same dimensionless units as Groenewold's formula (ℏ=1\hbar = 1ℏ=1),

W∣1⟩(0,0)=−1π<0.W_{|1\rangle}(0,0) = -\frac{1}{\pi} < 0.W∣1⟩​(0,0)=−π1​<0.

The source text introduces the Wigner distribution as one that "can and normally does take on negative values for states which have no classical model", marking quantum-mechanical interference; the first excited number state at the origin is its most compact explicit witness.

Formalization Note The statement fixes the wavefunction (the first normalized Hermite function), the Planck-constant slot to 111, and the phase-space point to the origin; there are no hypotheses.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_wigner
import Definitions.Def_wigner_states

open MeasureTheory
Formal statement
namespace Wigner

theorem fock_wigner_neg : wigner (fockState 1) 1 0 0 < 0 := by sorry

end Wigner
Source
Wikipedia, "Wigner quasiprobability distribution" (oldid 1376057304), section "Relation to classical mechanics" (negativity of W) and section "Examples" (Fock states). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_quasiprobability_distribution
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · glm-5-latest-short

The real number wigner(fockState 1,1,0,0)\mathrm{wigner}(\mathrm{fockState}\ 1, 1, 0, 0)wigner(fockState 1,1,0,0) is strictly less than 000. Here fockState 1 is the specific first normalized Hermite function 2−1/2π−1/4⋅2x⋅e−x2/22^{-1/2}\pi^{-1/4} \cdot 2x \cdot e^{-x^2/2}2−1/2π−1/4⋅2x⋅e−x2/2 read as a complex-valued function of a real variable, the Planck-constant slot is the number 111, and the phase-space point is (x,p)=(0,0)(x, p) = (0, 0)(x,p)=(0,0). There are no variables or hypotheses: the statement is about one fixed real number.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 18, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 18, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me