Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Positive measure of conjugation preimages of nonempty open sets

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08.corollary2

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let GGG be a Hausdorff locally compact second-countable topological group and let AAA be a Hausdorff locally compact second-countable abelian topological group with a continuous action of GGG by automorphisms, written g⋅ag\cdot ag⋅a. Let F:G×G→AF:G\times G\to AF:G×G→A be a Borel measurable two-cocycle, with pointwise identity

F(g,h)+F(gh,k)=g⋅F(h,k)+F(g,hk),F(1,g)=F(g,1)=0.F(g,h)+F(gh,k)=g\cdot F(h,k)+F(g,hk),\qquad F(1,g)=F(g,1)=0.F(g,h)+F(gh,k)=g⋅F(h,k)+F(g,hk),F(1,g)=F(g,1)=0.

Assume that FFF is continuous on UF×UFU_F\times U_FUF​×UF​, where UFU_FUF​ is an open identity neighborhood. Let E=A×FGE=A\times_F GE=A×F​G, with multiplication (a,g)(b,h)=(a+g⋅b+F(g,h),gh)(a,g)(b,h)=(a+g\cdot b+F(g,h),gh)(a,g)(b,h)=(a+g⋅b+F(g,h),gh) and inverse (a,g)−1=(−g−1⋅(a+F(g,g−1)),g−1)(a,g)^{-1}=(-g^{-1}\cdot(a+F(g,g^{-1})),g^{-1})(a,g)−1=(−g−1⋅(a+F(g,g−1)),g−1). Equip EEE with the topology generated by left translates of the rectangles UA×UGU_A\times U_GUA​×UG​, where UA,UGU_A,U_GUA​,UG​ are open identity neighborhoods and FFF is continuous on UG×UGU_G\times U_GUG​×UG​. Write e=(0,1)e=(0,1)e=(0,1) and π(a,g)=g\pi(a,g)=gπ(a,g)=g.

Let μ\muμ be a nonzero Borel measure on EEE with the properties obtained in Remark 4: it is finite on compact sets, and μ(xW)=μ(W)\mu(xW)=\mu(W)μ(xW)=μ(W) for every x∈Ex\in Ex∈E and Borel WWW whose closure is compact.

Let W⊆EW\subseteq EW⊆E be nonempty and open, and let x∈Ex\in Ex∈E. Then

μ(ix−1(W))>0,ix(y)=xyx−1.\mu(i_x^{-1}(W))>0,\qquad i_x(y)=xyx^{-1}.μ(ix−1​(W))>0,ix​(y)=xyx−1.

This supplies the positivity used for identity neighborhoods in the proof of Theorem 6.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P08
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08

open Set MeasureTheory

open scoped BigOperators Topology CompactlySupported

section ConstructedExtension

variable {G A : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
  [T2Space G] [LocallyCompactSpace G] [SecondCountableTopology G]
  [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
  [AddCommGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A] [IsTopologicalAddGroup A]
  [T2Space A] [LocallyCompactSpace A] [SecondCountableTopology A]
  [MeasurableSpace A] [BorelSpace A]

/-- Corollary 2, PDF p. 18. Correction: W must be nonempty; the literal
claim for W=empty is false. The proof applies it to an identity neighborhood.
This correction requires independent moderation. -/
theorem corollary2 (D : LocalCocycle G A) (mu : Measure (ExtensionPoint D))
    (hmu : IsLeftInvariantMeasure D mu) (W : Set (ExtensionPoint D))
    (hW : IsOpen W) (hne : W.Nonempty) (x : ExtensionPoint D) :
    0 < mu ((innerConjugation D x) ⁻¹' W) := by sorry

end ConstructedExtension

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P08
Source
On Cohomology theory for topological groups, arXiv:1009.4519v1, PDF p. 18, Corollary 2: positivity under inner conjugation
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let GGG be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological group, and let AAA be a Hausdorff, locally compact, second countable topological abelian group, both equipped with their Borel measurable structures. Let DDD specify additive automorphisms ρg\rho_gρg​ of AAA with ρ1=id\rho_1=\mathrm{id}ρ1​=id, ρgh=ρg∘ρh\rho_{gh}=\rho_g\circ\rho_hρgh​=ρg​∘ρh​, and jointly continuous (g,a)↦ρg(a)(g,a)\mapsto\rho_g(a)(g,a)↦ρg​(a); a measurable function c:G×G→Ac:G\times G\to Ac:G×G→A satisfying ρg(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)\rho_g(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k)ρg​(c(h,k))+c(g,hk)=c(g,h)+c(gh,k) and c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0c(1,g)=c(g,1)=0; and an open neighborhood NNN of 111 on whose square ccc is continuous. On E=A×GE=A\times GE=A×G, define (a,g)⋆(b,h)=(a+ρg(b)+c(g,h),gh)(a,g)\star(b,h)=(a+\rho_g(b)+c(g,h),gh)(a,g)⋆(b,h)=(a+ρg​(b)+c(g,h),gh) and (a,g)†=(ρg−1(−(a+c(g,g−1))),g−1)(a,g)^\dagger=(\rho_{g^{-1}}(-(a+c(g,g^{-1}))),g^{-1})(a,g)†=(ρg−1​(−(a+c(g,g−1))),g−1). Equip EEE with the topology generated by all sets {z⋆(a,g):a∈P, g∈Q}\{z\star(a,g):a\in P,\ g\in Q\}{z⋆(a,g):a∈P, g∈Q}, where z∈Ez\in Ez∈E, PPP is an open neighborhood of 000 in AAA, QQQ is an open neighborhood of 111 in GGG, and ccc is continuous on Q×QQ\times QQ×Q, and use its Borel measurable structure. Suppose μ\muμ is a nonzero measure on EEE, finite on every compact subset, and satisfies μ({z⋆w:w∈B})=μ(B)\mu(\{z\star w:w\in B\})=\mu(B)μ({z⋆w:w∈B})=μ(B) for every z∈Ez\in Ez∈E and every measurable B⊆EB\subseteq EB⊆E with compact closure. For every nonempty open set W⊆EW\subseteq EW⊆E and every x∈Ex\in Ex∈E, the set {y∈E:(x⋆y)⋆x†∈W}\{y\in E:(x\star y)\star x^\dagger\in W\}{y∈E:(x⋆y)⋆x†∈W} has strictly positive μ\muμ-measure. This conclusion permits that measure to be infinite.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me